Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-23 Thread Matthew Vanecek
reckon those are compiler-related. Right now, I have test12. This is on my desktop machine, doing normal desktop stuff (finances, StarOffice, Netscape, Java development, etc). Seems to be working well, and test12 runs

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-23 Thread Matthew Vanecek
pment, etc). Seems to be working well, and test12 runs *much* faster than previous kernels... -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there

Re: 2.4.0-test12 randomly hangs up

2000-12-13 Thread Matthew Vanecek
6 (S3 Trio 64 accel server), gcc 2.95.2 > > Not sure what the problem is yet... keep trying folks. :) > Maybe it's the 3.3.6. RH 7.0 comes with 4.0.1, and a newer glibc. Perhaps try recompiling XFree86 against the latest RH 7.0 glibc (2.1.94) and see what happens, or upgrade your XFree86

Re: 2.4.0-test12 randomly hangs up

2000-12-13 Thread Matthew Vanecek
, and a newer glibc. Perhaps try recompiling XFree86 against the latest RH 7.0 glibc (2.1.94) and see what happens, or upgrade your XFree86 to the standard RH 7.0 XFree86 4.0.1. -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-09 Thread Matthew Vanecek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Matthew Vanecek wrote: > > > > Have any of the folks seeing it checked if Ben LaHaise's fixes for the page > > > table updating race help ? > > > Alan > > > > Where are his fixes at? I don't

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-09 Thread Matthew Vanecek
folks seeing it checked if Ben LaHaise's fixes for the page > table updating race help ? > > Alan Where are his fixes at? I don't seem to see any of his posts in the archives. -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' ***

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-09 Thread Matthew Vanecek
fixes at? I don't seem to see any of his posts in the archives. -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-09 Thread Matthew Vanecek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Matthew Vanecek wrote: Have any of the folks seeing it checked if Ben LaHaise's fixes for the page table updating race help ? Alan Where are his fixes at? I don't seem to see any of his posts in the archives. dwmw2 posted one

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Vanecek
ain workstation. > > regards, > > Dave. > I've noticed the same problem, and it occasionally happens with XFree86 4.0.1, as well. Hopefully we've established that this is not the hardware issue which gcc people of so fond of pushing sig 11s on (even in the face of overwhelming evid

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Vanecek
$ ./op Illegal instruction (core dumped) Is that the expected behavior? -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Vanecek
) Is that the expected behavior? -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Vanecek
. Hopefully we've established that this is not the hardware issue which gcc people of so fond of pushing sig 11s on (even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary). It would be good to have this put on a current to-do list and looked into. -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41

Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

2000-11-24 Thread Matthew Vanecek
egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 -- Matthew Vanecek

Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

2000-11-24 Thread Matthew Vanecek
-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt

Re: Assembler warnings

2000-11-20 Thread Matthew Vanecek
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:11:04 -0600, > Matthew Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This > >is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on > >2.96!!).

Assembler warnings

2000-11-20 Thread Matthew Vanecek
: Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for .modinfo -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow

Assembler warnings

2000-11-20 Thread Matthew Vanecek
: Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for .modinfo -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow

Re: Assembler warnings

2000-11-20 Thread Matthew Vanecek
Keith Owens wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:11:04 -0600, Matthew Vanecek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on 2.96!!). It doesn't seem to break anything--I'm just