On 2006/12/15 at 15:44:14 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 15:06 -0600, Michal Sabala wrote:
> >
> > What nfs_debug information would be useful in tracking this
> > problem? Is there any other information I can provide you?
>
> C
On 2006/12/15 at 15:44:14 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 15:06 -0600, Michal Sabala wrote:
> > Could this be related to the fact that the nfs mmaped file is unlinked
> > before it is ummaped? The .nfsXXX file disappears from the NFS
>
On 2006/12/15 at 15:12:06 Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> >
> > I do not have any indication that it is the server not responding. Other
> > applications which have NFS files open are continuing to work while in
> > this case XFree86 blocks.
>
> just a strange question, but which
On 2006/12/15 at 14:42:08 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:50:30 -0600
> Michal Sabala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2006/12/15 at 10:24:15 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > On Thu, 2006
On 2006/12/15 at 13:44:44 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 11:50 -0600, Michal Sabala wrote:
> > On 2006/12/15 at 10:24:15 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 20:30 -0600, Michal Sabala wrote:
&g
On 2006/12/15 at 10:24:15 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 20:30 -0600, Michal Sabala wrote:
> >
> > `cat /proc/*PID*/wchan` for all hanging processes contains page_sync.
>
> Have you tried an 'echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger'
(dozens of consecutive runs were needed). As such this looks not to
be directly related to nfs.
I would like to assist in any way I can in tracking this bug. I am open
to running patched kernels, etc...
Thank You,
Sincerely,
Michal Sabala
PS. thank you for all the hard work on the Li
7 matches
Mail list logo
