Hello,
I was trying to read the SPI NOR flash and found that the pl330
controller dma mysteriously fails.
There is the problem that the 256 bytes of dma program buffer does not
suffice for the whole of 4M of the flash memory so all of it cannot be
possibly transferred in one go with the pl330
On 21 May 2015 at 01:38, Brian Norris wrote:
> + linux-spi, Mark
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> My SPI controller driver does not support DMA so writes are truncated to
>> FIFO size.
>
> Which SPI master driver?
I am using sunx
Hello,
On 21 May 2015 at 01:45, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:33:47PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> The 'retlen' points to a variable representing the number of data bytes
>> written/read (see include/linux/mtd/mtd.h) by the current invocation of
On 21 May 2015 at 01:38, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
+ linux-spi, Mark
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
My SPI controller driver does not support DMA so writes are truncated to
FIFO size.
Which SPI master driver?
I am using sunxi SPI
Hello,
On 21 May 2015 at 01:45, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:33:47PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
The 'retlen' points to a variable representing the number of data bytes
written/read (see include/linux/mtd/mtd.h) by the current invocation
On 13 May 2015 at 17:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:26:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>
>> > While this is nicer than the DT solution because of its accurate hardware
>> > representation, it's still not
On 13 May 2015 at 16:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:51:02PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
>> I'd say we're also ok because if we delegate the device driving logic
>> to userspace, we should expect it to know what it does to first drive
>> the device properly, but also to open
On 13 May 2015 at 13:26, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
>> While this is nicer than the DT solution because of its accurate hardware
>> representation, it's still not perfect because you might not have access to
>> the
>> DT, or you might be
On 13 May 2015 at 12:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:34:41AM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Bypass the check if CS is in use for spidev devices if CONFIG_SPIDEV_SHADOW
>> is
>> set. Rename spidev devices to avoid sysfs conflict.
&g
Bypass the check if CS is in use for spidev devices if CONFIG_SPIDEV_SHADOW is
set. Rename spidev devices to avoid sysfs conflict.
This allows dynamically loading SPI device overlays or communicating
with SPI devices configured by a kernel driver from userspace.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
On 13 May 2015 at 12:16, Maxime Ripard maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:34:41AM -, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Bypass the check if CS is in use for spidev devices if CONFIG_SPIDEV_SHADOW
is
set. Rename spidev devices to avoid sysfs conflict
Bypass the check if CS is in use for spidev devices if CONFIG_SPIDEV_SHADOW is
set. Rename spidev devices to avoid sysfs conflict.
This allows dynamically loading SPI device overlays or communicating
with SPI devices configured by a kernel driver from userspace.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
On 13 May 2015 at 13:26, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
While this is nicer than the DT solution because of its accurate hardware
representation, it's still not perfect because you might not have access to
the
DT, or you
On 13 May 2015 at 17:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:26:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
While this is nicer than the DT solution because of its accurate hardware
representation,
On 13 May 2015 at 16:36, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:51:02PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
I'd say we're also ok because if we delegate the device driving logic
to userspace, we should expect it to know what it does to first drive
the device properly, but
Hello,
On 12 May 2015 at 16:27, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I
Hello,
On 11 May 2015 at 15:28, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 02:23 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 11 May 2015 at 13:25, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Michal,
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2015 12:22 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
On 12 May 2015 at 16:27, Maxime Ripard maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
lkml.org is being
Hello,
On 11 May 2015 at 15:28, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On 05/11/2015 02:23 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 11 May 2015 at 13:25, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Hello Michal,
On 05/11/2015 12:22 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote
On 11 May 2015 at 13:25, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> On 05/11/2015 12:22 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> The Exynos defconfig includes mwifiex sdio support which is present on
>> some of the Exynos boards.
>>
>> For the WiFi to be us
.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
---
arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
index d034c96..5d4ee83f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs
.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
index d034c96..5d4ee83f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm
On 11 May 2015 at 13:25, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Hello Michal,
On 05/11/2015 12:22 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
The Exynos defconfig includes mwifiex sdio support which is present on
some of the Exynos boards.
For the WiFi to be usable two extra options
by: Boris Ostrovsky
> Reported-by: Michal Suchanek
> Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini
Tested-by: Michal Suchanek
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ker
Hello,
it appears the Linus master tree fails to build on ARM with XEN enabled.
Since commit 2b953a5e9 xen: Suspend ticks on all CPUs during suspend
provides the suspend function only for x86 this is not surprising.
I currently don't use XEN yet but building with XEN enabled was not a
problem
boris.ostrov...@oracle.com
Reported-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Tested-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
Hello,
it appears the Linus master tree fails to build on ARM with XEN enabled.
Since commit 2b953a5e9 xen: Suspend ticks on all CPUs during suspend
provides the suspend function only for x86 this is not surprising.
I currently don't use XEN yet but building with XEN enabled was not a
problem
On 4 May 2015 at 15:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 03:18:56 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 4 May 2015 at 14:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 01:11:03 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It ment
On 4 May 2015 at 14:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 01:11:03 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hi!
>
>> On 1 May 2015 at 16:20, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >&g
Hello,
On 1 May 2015 at 16:20, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> I can determine it for this particular chip. However, when the vendor
>> datasheet says the block is
On 4 May 2015 at 12:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:00:40PM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote:
>
>> I will investigate the fine details, but I fear we may need some
>> “compatibility” magic similar to “new_id” in USB to make it work,
>> because it seems as if you can ONLY force a
Hello,
On 1 May 2015 at 14:27, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> The SPI driver returns an error when more than 64 bytes are
>> transferred at once due to lack of DMA support.
>
> Have you tried the dmaengine patch and make the SPI driver use it?
>
The dmaengine is already merged or queued in sunxi-wip
Hello,
On 3 May 2015 at 23:00, Martin Sperl wrote:
>
>> On 03.05.2015, at 11:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Hrm, yes - that should work. I'd ask Greg, that's not something the bus
>> implements.
>
> It is still slightly more “complicated” from a distribution perspective,
> but if that is what makes
Hello,
On 3 May 2015 at 23:00, Martin Sperl ker...@martin.sperl.org wrote:
On 03.05.2015, at 11:59, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
Hrm, yes - that should work. I'd ask Greg, that's not something the bus
implements.
It is still slightly more “complicated” from a distribution
Hello,
On 1 May 2015 at 14:27, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
The SPI driver returns an error when more than 64 bytes are
transferred at once due to lack of DMA support.
Have you tried the dmaengine patch and make the SPI driver use it?
The dmaengine is already merged or
On 4 May 2015 at 12:12, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:00:40PM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote:
I will investigate the fine details, but I fear we may need some
“compatibility” magic similar to “new_id” in USB to make it work,
because it seems as if you can ONLY
Hello,
On 1 May 2015 at 16:20, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
I can determine it for this particular chip. However, when the vendor
datasheet says the block is 64/32K
On 4 May 2015 at 14:12, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 01:11:03 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
On 1 May 2015 at 16:20, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut
On 4 May 2015 at 15:35, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 03:18:56 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 4 May 2015 at 14:12, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 01:11:03 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
It mentions both
32KB Block Erase (BE) (52H
On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:13:12 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> The sector size of the flash memory is unclear from datasheet or may
>> possibly vary between chips so add a flag to always use 4k blocks.
>>
>> Currentl
On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:13:12 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
The sector size of the flash memory is unclear from datasheet or may
possibly vary between chips so add a flag to always use 4k blocks.
Currently 4k blocks are always
On 30 April 2015 at 20:43, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 03:33:47 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> The size of written data was added to user supplied value rather than
>> written at the provided address.
>
> You might want to work on the commit message a l
On 30 April 2015 at 18:30, wrote:
> Hello Michal:
>
>> I tried to connect a SPI NOR flash to my sunxi board and due to the
> current
>> sunxi SPI driver limitations it does not work.
>>
>> The SPI driver returns an error when more than 64 bytes are
>> transferred at once
>> due to lack of DMA
On 30 April 2015 at 18:30, thomas.bet...@rohde-schwarz.com wrote:
Hello Michal:
I tried to connect a SPI NOR flash to my sunxi board and due to the
current
sunxi SPI driver limitations it does not work.
The SPI driver returns an error when more than 64 bytes are
transferred at once
due
On 30 April 2015 at 20:43, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 03:33:47 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
The size of written data was added to user supplied value rather than
written at the provided address.
You might want to work on the commit message a little
On 29 April 2015 at 20:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> I am using a version of Maxime's patch myself right now. It does not
>> seem it's going to be include in the kernel any time soon, however.
>>
>> FWIW I ad
On 29 April 2015 at 20:06, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:44:59PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Please stop this, it is not helpful.
>
>> Then please make one of the useful ways of instanti
On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:43:37PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> > I know you have a viewpoint on this but engaging in this way is not
>> > helping anyone.
>
>> The point is that patching the kernel
On 29 April 2015 at 20:56, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a version of Maxime's patch myself right now. It does not
seem it's going to be include in the kernel any time soon, however.
FWIW I
On 29 April 2015 at 20:06, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:44:59PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
Please stop this, it is not helpful.
Then please make one of the useful ways of instantiating
On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:43:37PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I know you have a viewpoint on this but engaging in this way is not
helping anyone.
The point is that patching the kernel to use spidev is totally useless
On 28 April 2015 at 19:17, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > That is not the case as you well know. As has been said several times
>> > the compatible
On 28 April 2015 at 16:12, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:03:16AM -0700, Eric D. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I give Maxime's patch a try and got 4 spidev devices :
>> /dev/spidev32766.[0-3]
>>
>> root@bpi:~# ls -lh /dev/spidev*
>> crw--- 1 root root 153, 0 Apr 28 15:52
On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:52:54PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 28 April 2015 at 14:15, Eric D. wrote:
>
>> > I was just seeking a way to make spidev device appear under mainline kernel
>> > and found this thre
On 28 April 2015 at 16:03, Eric D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I give Maxime's patch a try and got 4 spidev devices :
> /dev/spidev32766.[0-3]
>
> root@bpi:~# ls -lh /dev/spidev*
> crw--- 1 root root 153, 0 Apr 28 15:52 /dev/spidev32766.0
> crw--- 1 root root 153, 1 Apr 28 15:52 /dev/spidev32766.1
>
On 28 April 2015 at 14:15, Eric D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am a mainline linux user of A20 (bananapi). I'am currently running a
> debian jessie with latest mainline kernel (4.0.0+).
> I have a project of home automation, based on nrfl04+ spi driven wireless
> chip.
> I was just seeking a way to make
On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:52:54PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 28 April 2015 at 14:15, Eric D. eric.dillm...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just seeking a way to make spidev device appear under mainline kernel
and found
On 28 April 2015 at 16:03, Eric D. eric.dillm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I give Maxime's patch a try and got 4 spidev devices :
/dev/spidev32766.[0-3]
root@bpi:~# ls -lh /dev/spidev*
crw--- 1 root root 153, 0 Apr 28 15:52 /dev/spidev32766.0
crw--- 1 root root 153, 1 Apr 28 15:52
On 28 April 2015 at 16:12, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:03:16AM -0700, Eric D. wrote:
Hi,
I give Maxime's patch a try and got 4 spidev devices :
/dev/spidev32766.[0-3]
root@bpi:~# ls -lh /dev/spidev*
crw--- 1 root root 153, 0 Apr 28
On 28 April 2015 at 14:15, Eric D. eric.dillm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'am a mainline linux user of A20 (bananapi). I'am currently running a
debian jessie with latest mainline kernel (4.0.0+).
I have a project of home automation, based on nrfl04+ spi driven wireless
chip.
I was just seeking
On 28 April 2015 at 19:17, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
That is not the case as you well know. As has been said several times
the compatible
On 27 April 2015 at 17:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> When you have a serial port and just connect serial device to it with
>> no special requirement you just specify the serial port in DT and talk
>> to the device
On 27 April 2015 at 12:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Please always provide context in your replies so people know what you're
> talking about.
>
>> I've a feeling everyone in this thread is ignoring the
>> raspberry pi
On 27 April 2015 at 12:04, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 08:53:16PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >> Also for driver prototyping you need a compatible which makes the
>> >> device accessible.
>> >>
>> >> If no spidev g
On 27 April 2015 at 11:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
>
>> > No, you add a compatible for the device that is connected to the bus
>> > through that slot.
>
On 26 April 2015 at 17:47, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a feeling everyone in this thread is ignoring the
>> raspberry pi use-case. Where the board is specifically
>> designed for educational purposes and used with lots of
On 26 April 2015 at 17:47, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
I've a feeling everyone in this thread is ignoring the
raspberry pi use-case. Where the board is specifically
designed for educational purposes
On 27 April 2015 at 11:36, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
No, you add a compatible for the device that is connected to the bus
through that slot.
There is no device connected
On 27 April 2015 at 12:04, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 08:53:16PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Also for driver prototyping you need a compatible which makes the
device accessible.
If no spidev general compatible is available people
On 27 April 2015 at 12:10, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Please always provide context in your replies so people know what you're
talking about.
I've a feeling everyone in this thread is ignoring the
raspberry pi
On 27 April 2015 at 17:13, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
When you have a serial port and just connect serial device to it with
no special requirement you just specify the serial port in DT and talk
On 26 April 2015 at 17:54, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 05:33:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 16:33, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >> On 2
On 26 April 2015 at 16:33, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >> On 26 Apri
On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 13:56, Martin Sperl wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 26.04.2015, at 13:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> >> I think there is actu
On 26 April 2015 at 13:56, Martin Sperl wrote:
>
>> On 26.04.2015, at 13:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I think there is actual a use for just binding spidev as spidev,
>> think e.g. the spi pins on the raspberry pi.
>>
>> How do you deal we suggest with such a situation ?
>
> I actually asked the
On 26 April 2015 at 10:42, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
>
> No commit log?
>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 2 +-
>> 2 f
On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
>> > fact that we have a bi
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
>> + {
>
> No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
>
Hello,
On 26 April 2015 at 10:39, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 03:00:31PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
>> {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-
Hello,
On 26 April 2015 at 10:39, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 03:00:31PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
ohci0 {
status = okay;
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi
On 26 April 2015 at 16:33, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote
On 26 April 2015 at 14:51, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 13:56, Martin Sperl ker...@martin.sperl.org wrote:
On 26.04.2015, at 13:23, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I think
On 26 April 2015 at 10:42, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
No commit log?
---
drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 2 +-
drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 2 +-
2 files
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
+A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
+spi2 {
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have
On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have
On 26 April 2015 at 13:56, Martin Sperl ker...@martin.sperl.org wrote:
On 26.04.2015, at 13:23, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I think there is actual a use for just binding spidev as spidev,
think e.g. the spi pins on the raspberry pi.
How do you deal we suggest with such a
On 26 April 2015 at 17:54, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 05:33:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 16:33, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:14:33PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote
On 29 September 2014 10:54, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> (CC linux-pm, as PM is the real reason behind disabling unused clocks)
>> (CC gregkh and lkml, for driver core)
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:06 AM,
On 29 September 2014 10:54, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Thierry,
(CC linux-pm, as PM is the real reason behind disabling unused clocks)
(CC gregkh and lkml, for driver core)
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at
On 9 October 2013 16:19, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 19 September 2013 12:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 18-09-13 16:56:08, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>> On 17 September 2013 23:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>>
>>> The d
On 9 October 2013 16:19, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 19 September 2013 12:13, Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote:
On Wed 18-09-13 16:56:08, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 17 September 2013 23:13, Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote:
Hello,
The default for dirty_ratio
On 29 January 2014 16:43, boris brezillon dev wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
>
> On 29/01/2014 16:11, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>
>> On 13 January 2014 10:02, boris brezillon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> boot 0 part properties:
>>> - uses sequential ECC
On 13 January 2014 10:02, boris brezillon wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
>
> On 11/01/2014 22:11, Henrik Nordström wrote:
>>
>> thanks for pointing out your documents
>> I'm trying to get the NAND driver with HW ECC (and HW RND)
>> without using DMA at all
>>
>> I tried many things but did not quite get
On 13 January 2014 10:02, boris brezillon b.brezil...@overkiz.com wrote:
Hi Henrik,
On 11/01/2014 22:11, Henrik Nordström wrote:
bbrezillon thanks for pointing out your documents
bbrezillon I'm trying to get the NAND driver with HW ECC (and HW RND)
without using DMA at all
I tried many
On 29 January 2014 16:43, boris brezillon dev b.brezillon@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Michal,
On 29/01/2014 16:11, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 13 January 2014 10:02, boris brezillon b.brezil...@overkiz.com wrote:
boot 0 part properties:
- uses sequential ECC
- uses 1024 bytes ECC blocks
On 7 December 2013 12:47, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey maxime,
>
> On 06-12-13 19:33, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:10:55PM +0100, oli...@schinagl.nl wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Oliver Schinagl
>>>
>>> This patch adds sunxi sata support to A10 and A20 boards
On 7 December 2013 12:47, Olliver Schinagl oliver+l...@schinagl.nl wrote:
Hey maxime,
On 06-12-13 19:33, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Oliver,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:10:55PM +0100, oli...@schinagl.nl wrote:
From: Oliver Schinagl oli...@schinagl.nl
This patch adds sunxi sata support to A10
: sun7i: cubieboard2: Enable GMAC instead of EMAC
> ARM: dts: sun7i: olinuxino-micro: Enable GMAC instead of EMAC
> ARM: dts: sun7i: Add ethernet alias for GMAC
Tested-By: Michal Suchanek
Works for me with RGMII and MII phy on top of 3.13rc3.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from t
-micro: Enable GMAC instead of EMAC
ARM: dts: sun7i: Add ethernet alias for GMAC
Tested-By: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Works for me with RGMII and MII phy on top of 3.13rc3.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
On 9 October 2013 16:19, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 19 September 2013 12:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 18-09-13 16:56:08, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>> On 17 September 2013 23:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>>
>>> The d
601 - 700 of 717 matches
Mail list logo