Hi Steven,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 02:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:00:16 +0530
> Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> > Following kernel crash noticed while running selftests: ftrace on arm64
> > Juno-r2
> > device running stable-rc linux-6.6.y ker
Following kernel crash noticed while running selftests: ftrace on arm64 Juno-r2
device running stable-rc linux-6.6.y kernel.
This kernel crash is hard to reproduce.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
kselftest: Running tests in ftrace
TAP version 13
1..1
# timeout set to 0
#
Hi Greg,
I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.15 branch.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
>>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c
>>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(create_local_trace_kprobe) in archive
>>> kernel/built-in.a
>>> referenced
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 20:38, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.4 branch.
I am sorry,
It is on stable-rc 5.15.
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
> >>>
Hi Greg,
I see the following build warning / errors everywhere on stable-rc 5.4 branch.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kallsyms_on_each_symbol
>>> referenced by trace_kprobe.c
>>> trace/trace_kprobe.o:(create_local_trace_kprobe) in archive
>>> kernel/built-in.a
>>> referenced by
/lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYu9GOEbD=rR5eMR-=HJ8H6rMsbzDC2ZY5=y50wpwae...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
> ---
> fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 22 ++--
> include/linux/tracefs.h | 43
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:37:08 +0530
> Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> >
> > I have tested the linux-trace.git trace/core and run selftests ftrace
> > the reported kernel panic [1] & [2] has been fixed but found
&
Hi Steven,
> Are you sure it was applied correctly?
Please ignore the build warnings / errors it was due to apply patch was
not successful.
> Perhaps check out the branch I
> have and let me know if you get the same errors.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git
_WFVSurMgCepTxunSJf=MTe=6...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 5790b1fb3d672 ("eventfs: Remove eventfs_file and just use
> eventfs_inode")
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
> Reported-by: Beau Belgrave
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
_WFVSurMgCepTxunSJf=MTe=6...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 5790b1fb3d672 ("eventfs: Remove eventfs_file and just use
> eventfs_inode")
> Reported-by: Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
In the above line "Reported-by:" is twice.
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamb
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 19:47, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:45 PM Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
> >
> > Following kernel BUG reported on qemu-arm64 running linux next 20210420
> > the config is enabled with KASAN.
imit: none
[ 23.922914] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal
exception in interrupt ]---
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
Full test log:
--
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2555059#L646
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-202104
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.114 release.
> There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.16 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
steps to reproduce:
# TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides
# portable and repeatable Linux kernel builds across a variety of
# architectures, toolchains, kernel
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.267 release.
> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.267 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.231 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.188 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.113 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.15 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.187 release.
> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.112 release.
> There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release.
> There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.14 release.
> There are 210 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.266 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.266 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 01:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:53:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.230 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.230 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.186 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.111 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.29 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.13 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 23:17, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 21:49, Shyam Prasad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Naresh,
> >
> > AFAIK, this has been fixed in an updated patch last evening. Can you please
> > check if you're still seeing it?
>
> Pl
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 21:49, Shyam Prasad wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> AFAIK, this has been fixed in an updated patch last evening. Can you please
> check if you're still seeing it?
Please share the fix commit and subject here.
FYI,
This build error is still on today's Linux next tag 20210409.
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:02, Chaitanya Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On 4/8/21 23:24, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >> bio_offset(req->bio),
> >> GDROM_DMA_STARTADDR_REG);
> >> __raw_writel(block_cnt * GDROM_HARD_SECTOR, GDROM_DMA_LENG
Hi Chaitanya,
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 11:01, Chaitanya Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On 4/8/21 22:21, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Linux next tag 20210408 architecture sh builds failed due to these errors.
> >
> > # to reproduce this build locally:
> >
> > make --sile
: error: 'rq' undeclared
(first use in this function)
586 | __raw_writel(page_to_phys(bio_page(req->bio)) + bio_offset(rq->bio),
| ^~
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
Regressions found on sh:
- build/gcc-9-dreamcast_defconfig
-
; [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
Regressions found on parisc:
- build/gcc-9-defconfig
- build/gcc-8-defconfig
- build/gcc-10-defconfig
Regressions found on sh:
- build/gcc-9-dreamcast_defconfig
- build/gcc-10-dreamcast_defconfig
- build/gcc-8-dreamcast
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 15:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:33 AM Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 04:21, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:38 AM Naresh Kamboju
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 04:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:38 AM Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
> >
> > While running kselftest recently added gpio gpio-sim.sh test case the
> > following
> > warning was triggered on Linux next tag 2
disabled at (5577): []
irq_exit+0x1b4/0x1c0
[ 143.377992] ---[ end trace bc3c86ef609281aa ]---
# 1.2. chip_name returns 'none' if the chip is still pending
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
metadata:
git branch: master
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
git
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.265 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.265 release.
> There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.229 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.185 release.
> There are 56 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.110 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.28 release.
> There are 126 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 14:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.12 release.
> There are 152 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
] ---[ end trace bc3c86ef609281aa ]---
# 1.2. chip_name returns 'none' if the chip is still pending
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
metadata:
git branch: master
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
git describe: next-20210330
kernel-config:
http
Small correction,
As per available test data the good tag is next-20210326.
GOOD: next-20210326
BAD: next-20210330
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 22:19, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> While running kselftest gpio on x86_64 and i386 the following warnings were
> noticed and the device did not recover
roc_entry+0x1a8/0x1c0
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
metadata:
git branch: master
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
git describe: next-20210330
kernel-config:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/intel-corei7-64/lkft/linux-next/9
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.264 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.264 release.
> There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.228 release.
> There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.184 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.109 release.
> There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release.
> There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 15:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
> There are 252 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> From: Anshuman Khandual
>
> [ Upstream commit 03aaf83fba6e5af08b5dd174c72edee9b7d9ed9b ]
>
> This overrides arch_get_mappable_range() on arm64 platform which will be
> used with recently added generic framework. It drops
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release.
> There are 221 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 14:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
> There are 254 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
> There are 150 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 14:19, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 20:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
> > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
ff8100
(relocation range: 0x8000-0xbfff)
steps to reproduce:
--
- cd /opt/kselftests/mainline/net/mptcp
- ./mptcp_join.sh || true
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
crash test link:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2436164
Revert
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.263 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.263 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.227 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.183 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.108 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
c-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919/testrun/4221759/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-warning-2434838/log
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.25-157-gdeabac90f919/testrun/4221747/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-bug-2434809/log
LAVA jobs link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2436164
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.9 release.
> There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
nfig
- clang-10-tinyconfig
- clang-10-allnoconfig
- clang-11-allnoconfig
- clang-11-tinyconfig
- clang-12-tinyconfig
- clang-12-allnoconfig
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
link:
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/1117167411#L142
steps to reproduce:
config
- gcc-10-allnoconfig
- gcc-10-tinyconfig
- clang-10-tinyconfig
- clang-10-allnoconfig
- clang-11-allnoconfig
- clang-11-tinyconfig
- clang-12-tinyconfig
- clang-12-allnoconfig
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
link:
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/job
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.107 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.182 release.
> There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.8 release.
> There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 16 | KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH < 10);
^~~~
make[2]: *** [ scripts/Makefile.build:273: lib/test_slub.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [ Makefile:1980: lib] Error 2
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MAC
/Makefile.build:271:
scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
build link,
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/torvalds/linux-mainline/-/jobs/1110841374#L81
steps to reproduce:
--
# TuxMake is a command line tool and Python library that provides
# portable
'kvmhv_enter_nested_guest'
[-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
^
1 error generated.
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:271:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.o] Error 1
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
The following build errors / warnings
^~~~
make[2]: *** [ scripts/Makefile.build:273: lib/test_slub.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [ Makefile:1980: lib] Error 2
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-next/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/984/consoleFull
https://ci.li
-gnu- 'CC=sccache s390x-linux-gnu-gcc'
'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
s390x-linux-gnu-ld: arch/s390/kernel/entry.o: in function `sys_call_table_emu':
(.rodata+0x1bc0): undefined reference to `__s390_'
make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1212: vmlinux] Error 1
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
steps to reproduce
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 15:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:28:40PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > While booting Linux mainline master 5.12.0-rc2 and 5.12.0-rc3 on arm64
> > Hikey device the following KFENCE bug was found.
> >
>
-rc2 #2
/[ 19.341360] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT)
[ 19.350439] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju
metadata:
git branch: master
git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/torvalds/linux-mainline
git commit
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:23, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.262 release.
> There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:23, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.262 release.
> There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:29, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.226 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:29, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.181 release.
> There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:35, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release.
> There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:27, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release.
> There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:27, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.7 release.
> There are 306 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:57, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.261 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.261 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.225 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:56, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.180 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 18:55, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.105 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 23:59, wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
1 - 100 of 1788 matches
Mail list logo
