Re: sata_nv ADMA controller lockup investigation

2007-03-20 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Not sure if this helps. I'm getting this reset with 2.6.21-rc4. After the reset the controller seems to work again. sata_nv :00:07.0: version 3.3 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APSI] enabled at IRQ 22 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:07.0[A] -> Link [APSI] -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22 sata_nv

Re: sata_nv ADMA controller lockup investigation

2007-03-20 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Not sure if this helps. I'm getting this reset with 2.6.21-rc4. After the reset the controller seems to work again. sata_nv :00:07.0: version 3.3 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APSI] enabled at IRQ 22 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:07.0[A] - Link [APSI] - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22 sata_nv

Re: sata_nv - ADMA issues with 2.6.20

2007-02-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
> David R wrote: Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7: Resetting port Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7.00: cmd 61/08:00:1f:e4:50/00:00:09:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 4096

Re: sata_nv - ADMA issues with 2.6.20

2007-02-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
David R wrote: Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7: Resetting port Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen Feb 9 18:40:29 server kernel: ata7.00: cmd 61/08:00:1f:e4:50/00:00:09:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 4096 out Feb 9 18:40:29

Re: [PATCH] Page aging for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:12:32PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > Your idea /heavily/ penalises libc and executable pages by aging them > more often than anonymous pages... I don't think I age anonymous pages any more than any other type of page. Perhaps you are saying that shared pages should

Re: [PATCH] Page aging for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:12:32PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: Your idea /heavily/ penalises libc and executable pages by aging them more often than anonymous pages... I don't think I age anonymous pages any more than any other type of page. Perhaps you are saying that shared pages should

[PATCH] Page aging for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-10 Thread Neil Schemenauer
. -- Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.enme.ucalgary.ca/~nascheme/ diff -ur linux-2.4/Makefile linux-age/Makefile --- linux-2.4/Makefile Sun Sep 10 10:15:27 2000 +++ linux-age/Makefile Sun Sep 10 15:06:14 2000 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 4 SUBLEVEL = 0 -EXTRAVERSION =

[PATCH] Page aging for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-10 Thread Neil Schemenauer
. -- Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.enme.ucalgary.ca/~nascheme/ diff -ur linux-2.4/Makefile linux-age/Makefile --- linux-2.4/Makefile Sun Sep 10 10:15:27 2000 +++ linux-age/Makefile Sun Sep 10 15:06:14 2000 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 4 SUBLEVEL = 0 -EXTRAVERSION = -test8