On 27 May 2016, David Miller stated:
> From: Nick Alcock
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:19:27 +0100
>
>> The only difference between the two series above is that in the crashing
>> series, the ka_restorer stub functions __rt_sigreturn_stub and
>> __sigr
On 27 May 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz outgrape:
> Hi Nick!
>
> On 05/27/2016 03:19 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> So I've been working on a patch series (see below) that applies GCC's
>> -fstack-protector{-all,-strong} to almost all of glibc bar the dynamic
>>
[Resent with fixed address for sparclinux@; sorry!]
So I've been working on a patch series (see below) that applies GCC's
-fstack-protector{-all,-strong} to almost all of glibc bar the dynamic
linker. In trying to upstream it, one review commenter queried one
SPARC-specific patch in the series; th
So I've been working on a patch series (see below) that applies GCC's
-fstack-protector{-all,-strong} to almost all of glibc bar the dynamic
linker. In trying to upstream it, one review commenter queried one
SPARC-specific patch in the series; the absence of this patch triggers a
BUG in the SPARC k
On 29 Jan 2014, Al Viro outgrape:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:57:20AM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> ssize_t ret = -EBADF;
>>
>> -if (pos < 0)
>> +f = fdget(fd);
>> +if ((pos < 0) && (!f.file || !unsigned_offsets(f.file))) {
&
.
Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock
---
fs/read_write.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 58e440d..f33f664 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -534,10 +534,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pread64
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert stated:
> Once I noticed that scsi_get_vpd_page() works fine from other function
> calls and that it is not 0x89, but already 0x0 that fails fixing it became
> easy.
>
> Nix, any chance you could verify it also works for you?
Confirmed, thank you!
> Somehow older ar
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
> Once I noticed that scsi_get_vpd_page() works fine from other function
> calls and that it is not 0x89, but already 0x0 that fails fixing it became
> easy.
>
> Nix, any chance you could verify it also works for you?
Sorry for the delay: it's hard for me
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
> On 07/30/2013 01:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> (wheezy)fslab1:~# sg_inq -v /dev/sdc
>> inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
>> standard INQUIRY:
>> inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 60 00
>> PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=0 version=0x05 [SPC-3]
>> [AER
My server's ARC-1210 has been working fine for years, but when I
upgraded from 3.10.1, it started failing:
Instead of
[0.784044] Areca RAID Controller0: F/W V1.46 2009-01-06 & Model ARC-1210
[0.804028] scsi0 : Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller
Driver Version 1.20.00.15 2010/08/05
[
10 matches
Mail list logo
