much in advance for your help.
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
much in advance for your help.
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
On Tue 19 Apr 2016 06:26:27 PM PDT, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Hi
I am looking into a bug that results in umount failures ( since there is a
mount ref from the leaked file that is never freed on the mount )
The issue seems to be a result of the following callstack
39.958104: <6>
On Tue 19 Apr 2016 06:26:27 PM PDT, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Hi
I am looking into a bug that results in umount failures ( since there is a
mount ref from the leaked file that is never freed on the mount )
The issue seems to be a result of the following callstack
39.958104: <6>
delayed_fput_list
Any chance you can help me get to the bottom of this leak?
I dont understand why the delayed_fput_list is missing the file.
Is there some sort of race condition?
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of
delayed_fput_list
Any chance you can help me get to the bottom of this leak?
I dont understand why the delayed_fput_list is missing the file.
Is there some sort of race condition?
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of
On 02/03/2016 11:53 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:05:57AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your review again :)
Uh... how do you know at this point that the file is actually writable?
Normally, e.g. vfs_write() will ensure that the file is writable, and
e.g
not sure what you mean.
Again thanks for your reviews :)
Appreciate your help
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
On 02/01/2016 11:45 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:28:51AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
On Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:15:56 AM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:56:27AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
On 02/03/2016 11:53 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:05:57AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your review again :)
Uh... how do you know at this point that the file is actually writable?
Normally, e.g. vfs_write() will ensure that the file is writable, and
e.g
On 02/01/2016 11:45 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:28:51AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
On Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:15:56 AM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:56:27AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
not sure what you mean.
Again thanks for your reviews :)
Appreciate your help
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
On Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:15:56 AM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:56:27AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
[...]
+static ssize_t fuse_passthrough_read_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb
name to passthrough from stacked_io
[Proposed by Linus Torvalds]
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 13 +++--
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +++--
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
On Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:15:56 AM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:56:27AM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
[...]
+static ssize_t fuse_passthrough_read_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb
name to passthrough from stacked_io
[Proposed by Linus Torvalds]
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy <red...@codeaurora.org>
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 13 +++--
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +++--
fs/fus
On Fri 22 Jan 2016 03:04:36 PM PST, Mike Shal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Nikhilesh Reddy
mailto:red...@codeaurora.org>> wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -569,6 +570,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_simple_request(struct fuse_conn
*fc, struct fuse_args
On Fri 22 Jan 2016 03:04:36 PM PST, Mike Shal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Nikhilesh Reddy
<red...@codeaurora.org <mailto:red...@codeaurora.org>> wrote:
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -569,6 +570,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_simple_request(struct fuse_conn
.
My enthusiasm is getting the better of me:)
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
.
My enthusiasm is getting the better of me:)
--
Thanks
Nikhilesh Reddy
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
eved which
is really important on embedded systems that use fuse for I/O.
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +++--
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 03:38:41 PM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:20:34PM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Add support for filesystem passthrough read/write of files
when enabled in userspace through the option FUSE_PASSTHROUGH.
[...]
+ daemon_fd = (int)open_out
On 01/18/2016 06:57 PM, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
On 01/15/2016 01:53 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski
wrote:
If mmap sets vm_file to the underlying thing, wouldn't CRIU and
anything else that uses map_files get confused? Or did you have
something else
eved which
is really important on embedded systems that use fuse for I/O.
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +++--
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
On 01/18/2016 07:07 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
2016-01-14 0:53 GMT+01:00 Nikhilesh Reddy :
Add support for filesystem stacked read/write of files
when enabled through a userspace init option of FUSE_STACKED_IO.
When FUSE_STACKED_IO is enabled all the reads and writes
to the fuse mount point go
On 01/18/2016 07:07 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
2016-01-14 0:53 GMT+01:00 Nikhilesh Reddy <red...@codeaurora.org>:
Add support for filesystem stacked read/write of files
when enabled through a userspace init option of FUSE_STACKED_IO.
When FUSE_STACKED_IO is enabled all the reads and
On 01/18/2016 06:57 PM, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
On 01/15/2016 01:53 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
wrote:
If mmap sets vm_file to the underlying thing, wouldn't CRIU and
anything else that uses map_files get confused?
eved which
is really important on embedded systems that use fuse for I/O.
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy <red...@codeaurora.org>
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 03:38:41 PM PST, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:20:34PM -0800, Nikhilesh Reddy wrote:
Add support for filesystem passthrough read/write of files
when enabled in userspace through the option FUSE_PASSTHROUGH.
[...]
+ daemon_fd = (int)open_out
eved which
is really important on embedded systems that use fuse for I/O.
Signed-off-by: Nikhilesh Reddy <red...@codeaurora.org>
---
fs/fuse/Makefile | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++
fs/fuse/file.c | 37 +
30 matches
Mail list logo
