RE: [PATCH 14/14] skd: remove skd_bio code

> -Original Message- > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [mailto:b.zolnier...@samsung.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:01 PM > To: Ramprasad C > Cc: ax...@kernel.dk; Akhil Bhansali; jmo...@redhat.com; > kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 2/2] skd: Restricted pr_debug() lines to 80 characters

>From 6ff5102b3cd8047bb4bfb4d0165f289249e23bbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rchinthekindi Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:49:58 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] skd: Restricted pr_debug() lines to 80 characters Restricted pr_debug() lines to 80 characters Signed-off-by: Ramprasad C --- drivers/block/sk

RE: [PATCH] block: Device driver for sTec's PCIe Kronos Card.

Hi Jeff, Thank you for reviewing the patch. Regards, Akhil From: Jeff Moyer [jmo...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 6:18 AM To: OS Engineering Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ax...@kernel.dk; Akhil Bhansali; Ramprasad Chinthekindi; Amit

RE: Performance Comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache.

>On Jun 11, 2013 11:06 AM, "OS Engineering" wrote: >> >> Hi Jens, >> >> In continuation with our previous communication, we have carried out >> performance comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache. >How reproducible are these results?  Any

RE: Performance Comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache.

> -Original Message- > From: Amit Kale [mailto:amitk...@geeksofpune.in] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:28 AM > To: OS Engineering > Cc: koverstr...@google.com; linux-bca...@vger.kernel.org; > thorn...@redhat.com; dm-de...@redhat.com; LKML; Jens Axboe; Padmini > B

[no subject]

Hi Jens, In continuation with our previous communication, we have carried out performance comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache. We found that EnhanceIO provides better throughput on zipf workload (with theta=1.2) in comparison to bcache and dm-cache for write through caches. However,

Performance Comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache.

Hi Jens, In continuation with our previous communication, we have carried out performance comparison among EnhanceIO, bcache and dm-cache. We found that EnhanceIO provides better throughput on zipf workload (with theta=1.2) in comparison to bcache and dm-cache for write through caches. However,

EnhanceIO(TM) caching driver features [2/3]

Hi, Here is a description of error handling as stated in a previous email. When an IO is submitted to a cache and an OS crash or an abrupt power failure occurs before the cahe completes the IO and returns success status - The end result after a reboot is that some of the blocks contained in th

EnhanceIO(TM) caching driver features [1/3]

Hi Jens and Kernel Gurus, We are submitting EnhanceIO(TM) caching driver for an inclusion in Linux kernel. It's an enterprise grade caching solution having been validated extensively in-house, in a large number of enterprise installations. It features this distinct property not found in dm-cach