Quoth Helge Hafting:
> This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the "raid autodetect"
> partition type for non-raid as well. The autodetect routine could
> then create /dev/partitions/home, /dev/partitions/usr or
> /dev/partitions/name_of_my_choice
> for autodetect partitions not
Quoth Helge Hafting:
This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the raid autodetect
partition type for non-raid as well. The autodetect routine could
then create /dev/partitions/home, /dev/partitions/usr or
/dev/partitions/name_of_my_choice
for autodetect partitions not
Hi
I have a SparcStation 10 with dual SuperSparc processors (_not_
sparc64), and I am unable to compile the latest kernel from
vger.samba.org CVS. Standard Linus kernels neither work, but I figure
they aren't supposed to...
The reason seems to be that the functions pmd_alloc_one_fast,
Hi
I have a SparcStation 10 with dual SuperSparc processors (_not_
sparc64), and I am unable to compile the latest kernel from
vger.samba.org CVS. Standard Linus kernels neither work, but I figure
they aren't supposed to...
The reason seems to be that the functions pmd_alloc_one_fast,
Quoth Nico Schottelius:
> Can somebody give me a hint where to find documentation about
> sysctl and howto use/program that ?
> This is what Simon and David suggested.
>
> But as long as I am not able to make sysctl's, I would like
> to add this feature under the General setup.
>
> What do
Quoth Keith Owens:
> Userspace problem, userspace fix.
>
> setterm -blength 0 (text)
> xset b 0 (X11)
Well, some buggy programs don't care about you turning off beeping in
X. I think gnome-terminal or such has its own checkbox for turning
beeps on or off.
I still agree that this is
Quoth Keith Owens:
Userspace problem, userspace fix.
setterm -blength 0 (text)
xset b 0 (X11)
Well, some buggy programs don't care about you turning off beeping in
X. I think gnome-terminal or such has its own checkbox for turning
beeps on or off.
I still agree that this is fixing
Quoth Nico Schottelius:
Can somebody give me a hint where to find documentation about
sysctl and howto use/program that ?
This is what Simon and David suggested.
But as long as I am not able to make sysctl's, I would like
to add this feature under the General setup.
What do you think
Quoth "Jeroen Geusebroek":
> If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
> software raid)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Yours is listed under "supported, but not for RAID", which probably
means it works well when accessing individual disks, which again should
mean
Quoth Jeroen Geusebroek:
If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
software raid)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Yours is listed under supported, but not for RAID, which probably
means it works well when accessing individual disks, which again should
mean it
Pavel Machek wrote:
> xargs is very ugly. I want to rm 12*. Just plain "rm 12*". *Not* "find
> . -name "12*" | xargs rm, which has terrible issues with files names
>
> "xyzzy"
> "bla"
> "xyzzy bla"
> "12 xyzzy bla"
These you work around using the smarter, \0 terminated, version:
find . -name
Pavel Machek wrote:
xargs is very ugly. I want to rm 12*. Just plain "rm 12*". *Not* "find
. -name "12*" | xargs rm, which has terrible issues with files names
"xyzzy"
"bla"
"xyzzy bla"
"12 xyzzy bla"
These you work around using the smarter, \0 terminated, version:
find . -name "12*"
Alexander Viro spake thus:
> Maybe... I definitely agree that 14 is below the limit, but 30... Hell knows,
> from what I see on the box I'm using right now it seems to fall into several
> cathegories:
> * Very-Long-And-Verbose-Named-HOWTO.html
> * manpages for X and Tcl functions
Alexander Viro spake thus:
Maybe... I definitely agree that 14 is below the limit, but 30... Hell knows,
from what I see on the box I'm using right now it seems to fall into several
cathegories:
* Very-Long-And-Verbose-Named-HOWTO.html
* manpages for X and Tcl functions with
14 matches
Mail list logo
