On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Paul Cassella wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:58:58AM +, Yongqiang Liu wrote:
> > > > We should always call dax_region_put() whenever devm_create_dev_dax()
> > > &
; > - return PTR_ERR(dev_dax);
> >
> > /* child dev_dax instances now own the lifetime of the dax_region */
This comment should probably be updated now. :)
--
Paul Cassella
> > dax_region_put(dax_region);
> > - return 0;
> > +
> > + return IS_ERR(dev_dax) ? PTR_ERR(dev_dax) : 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int dax_hmem_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Paul Cassella wrote:
> Hangs under 2.4.2-ac{18,19,24} that do not happen under -ac12.
I've been running -ac27 for over 5 days, and it's been fine, so this seems
to have been fixed.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Paul Cassella wrote:
Hangs under 2.4.2-ac{18,19,24} that do not happen under -ac12.
I've been running -ac27 for over 5 days, and it's been fine, so this seems
to have been fixed.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
ing the pm.c change.
I also haven't tried anything after 24; is it likely to have been fixed?
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majord
though.
> When I get home and reboot (following this most recent hang :( ), I'll
> put the diff, .config, and more stuff from /proc at
> http://manetheren.eigenray.com/~fortytwo/crash-12-18.2
This is now there.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &qu
kernel();
inode->i_op->truncate(inode);
+ unlock_kernel();
+ }
return 0;
out:
return -EFBIG;
A few lines earlier in this function, inode->i_op->truncate() is called
without lock_kernel(). Should it also have a lock_kernel(), or i
inode-i_op-truncate(inode);
+ unlock_kernel();
+ }
return 0;
out:
return -EFBIG;
A few lines earlier in this function, inode-i_op-truncate() is called
without lock_kernel(). Should it also have a lock_kernel(), or is it not
needed there?
--
Paul Cassella
-
.
When I get home and reboot (following this most recent hang :( ), I'll
put the diff, .config, and more stuff from /proc at
http://manetheren.eigenray.com/~fortytwo/crash-12-18.2
This is now there.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
the pm.c change.
I also haven't tried anything after 24; is it likely to have been fixed?
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Paul Cassella wrote:
> and mss_now seems to be less than skb->len when the printk happens. My
> copy of K is at work; could that comparison be being done unsigned
> because of skb->len? I wouldn't think so, but the alternative seems
> somewhat worse...
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Paul Cassella wrote:
and mss_now seems to be less than skb-len when the printk happens. My
copy of KR is at work; could that comparison be being done unsigned
because of skb-len? I wouldn't think so, but the alternative seems
somewhat worse...
That'll teach me to post
6,8 +2069,10 @@
if (sk->state != TCP_LISTEN)
break;
err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
- if (signal_pending(current))
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ CHECK_TCP_RET();
break;
+ }
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
> > write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
> Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
> errors ?
The CVS versio
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:55:28 -0600 (CST)
>From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
>write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
>
>
) messages that -ac3
fixed. I'm also getting TCP peer shrinks window messages, but had none
this boot before this error.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I'm also getting TCP peer shrinks window messages, but had none
this boot before this error.
--
Paul Cassella
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:55:28 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Cassella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
What you describe I can only say
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
errors ?
The CVS version (perhaps even version
le of how they could be used to achieve the same behavior as the code
that was posted.
--
Paul Cassella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
the list, but I'm going
on vacation tomorrow, so I'd appreciate a Cc: so I have a better chance of
answering before then. Thanks.
--
Paul Cassella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And now, the code.
include/linux/sv.h:
/*
This is the version I'm using with a test8-pre1 kernel, so it uses the
old TASK_EXC
, so I'd appreciate a Cc: so I have a better chance of
answering before then. Thanks.
--
Paul Cassella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And now, the code.
include/linux/sv.h:
/*
This is the version I'm using with a test8-pre1 kernel, so it uses the
old TASK_EXCLUSIVE semantics; it should be trivial to mak
behavior as the code
that was posted.
--
Paul Cassella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
23 matches
Mail list logo
