Alan Cox wrote:
> > http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092935,00.html >
>
> Of course the URL that goes with that is :
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/features.asp
>
> Yes., Microsoft ship GNU C (quite legally) as part of their offerings...
Do they include the
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Sorry, but http://www.linux-ide.org/ clearly states that nothing below a
> given line supports hardware/bios-soft raid.
Promise are clearly being less than helpful here and that is not your fault.
However as far as I can see everyone who has a FastTrak which is "stuck"
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Paul Flinders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> |> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> |>
> |> > This [isspace('\r') == 1] has no significance here. The right thing to
> |>
> |> > look at is $IFS, which does not contain \r by
Paul Flinders wrote:
> uses space (0x20) and tab (0x8) as white space and no other character.
>
I mean, of course, tab (_0x9_)
I just checked - the kernel isspace() macro says that \r is whitespace.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This [isspace('\r') == 1] has no significance here. The right thing to
> look at is $IFS, which does not contain \r by default. The shell only splits
> words by "IFS whitespace", and the kernel should be consistent with it:
>
> $ echo -e 'ls foo\r' | sh
> ls: foo: No s
Jeff Mcadams wrote:
> Also sprach Rik van Riel
> >On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, John Kodis wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 08:40:22AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >> > Somebody must have missed the boat entirely. Unix does not, never
> >> > has, and never will end a text line with '\r'.
>
> >> Un
I'm trying to get some rough figures for the sort of performance
I could expect from a load-balancing application whose job would
be to re-direct incomming UDP packets to a set of target systems
(and handle fail-over etc).
To test this I wrote a very simple application that sends UDP packets
out
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
>
> Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
> their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the
>
Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Paul Flinders wrote:
> >
> > > Talking of the Promise are there any plans to support re-enabling
> > > of the 2nd channel for boards which have an on-board FastTr
Talking of the Promise are there any plans to support re-enabling
of the 2nd channel for boards which have an on-board FastTrak?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
My Dual 866Mhz PIII died whilst compiling gcc with
ksymoops -m /boot/System.map-2.4.1-pre7 < ~/oops
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.1-pre7. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.1-pre7/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good! I'm not the only ome getting this error! Mine is also a VT82C686
> though mine is a VT82C686A (352 BGA). This is on an MSI Model 694D Pro
> motherboard running dual PIII-733 FC-PGA 133MHz Coppermines. RAM is 4
> 256MB PC133 unbuffered 7ns n
Has anyone got either 2.2.x or 2.4.0 booted on the above motherboard?
This board has an integrated Promise Fasttrack ATA/100 controller - I
know that to support the hardware RAID I need the binary only drivers
from Promise but I'd rather not use these if software RAID works as
there's no source,
The sundance driver in 2.4.0-test11 doesn't seem to like a DFE-550
that I have
On module installation te driver identifies the card but cant find any
PHYs, also if I remove the module afterwards I can't reinsert it.
Any suggestions?
The messages are
On installation:
eth0: OEM Sundance Technol
Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3) Java sucks in many ways. Today's way is that it
> never occurred to Sun that a machine might have more
> than one IP address assigned to it, so
> InetAddress.getLocalHost() returns exactly one
> address. Unfortunately, just about EVERY machine has
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
