Re: [PATCH 37/59] sysctl: C99 convert arch/sh64/kernel/traps.c and remove ABI breakage.

2007-01-16 Thread Paul Mundt
for the sysctl binary interface only leaving sysctl /proc support. At least the sysctl tables were placed at the end of the list so user space did not see this mistake. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looks good, thanks Eric. Acked-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe

Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3] rtc-sh correctly reports rtc_wkalrm.enabled

2007-01-06 Thread Paul Mundt
> Looks good, thanks David. Acked-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3] rtc-sh correctly reports rtc_wkalrm.enabled

2007-01-06 Thread Paul Mundt
. Acked-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages. take 2.

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Mundt
in to account. The following patch attempts to catch the bogus values and round it up to at least 0-order. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- mm/page_alloc.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 8c1a116..4a9a83f

[PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages. take 2.

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Mundt
in to account. The following patch attempts to catch the bogus values and round it up to at least 0-order. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- mm/page_alloc.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 8c1a116..4a9a83f 100644

Re: Using _syscall3 to manipulate files in a driver

2007-01-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:13:52PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > I have the source code for a vendor written driver that is targeted at > 2.6.9. It includes this and then proceeds to manipulate files from the > driver. > > asmlinkage _syscall3(int,write,int,fd,const char *,buf,off_t,count) >

Re: replace "memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE)" calls with "clear_page()"?

2007-01-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:59:32AM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > > > regarding alignment that don't allow clear_page() to be used > > > copy_page() in the memcpy() case), but it's going to need a lot of > > Maybe these optimalisations should be in the coding style docs? > For what purpose?

Re: replace memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE) calls with clear_page()?

2007-01-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:59:32AM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote: regarding alignment that don't allow clear_page() to be used copy_page() in the memcpy() case), but it's going to need a lot of Maybe these optimalisations should be in the coding style docs? For what purpose?

Re: Using _syscall3 to manipulate files in a driver

2007-01-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:13:52PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: I have the source code for a vendor written driver that is targeted at 2.6.9. It includes this and then proceeds to manipulate files from the driver. asmlinkage _syscall3(int,write,int,fd,const char *,buf,off_t,count) asmlinkage

Re: replace "memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE)" calls with "clear_page()"?

2006-12-31 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:14PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > fair enough. *technically*, not every call of the form > "memset(ptr,0,PAGE_SIZE)" necessarily represents an address that's on > a page boundary. but, *realistically*, i'm guessing most of them do. > just grabbing a random

Re: replace memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE) calls with clear_page()?

2006-12-31 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:14PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: fair enough. *technically*, not every call of the form memset(ptr,0,PAGE_SIZE) necessarily represents an address that's on a page boundary. but, *realistically*, i'm guessing most of them do. just grabbing a random example

Re: [PATCH] introduce config option to disable DMA zone on i386

2006-12-28 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 03:03:02PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > The following patch adds a config option to get rid of the DMA zone on i386. > > Architectures with devices that have no addressing limitations (eg. PPC) > already work this way. > > This is useful for custom kernel builds where

Re: [PATCH] introduce config option to disable DMA zone on i386

2006-12-28 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 03:03:02PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: The following patch adds a config option to get rid of the DMA zone on i386. Architectures with devices that have no addressing limitations (eg. PPC) already work this way. This is useful for custom kernel builds where the

Re: [PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages.

2006-12-27 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:42:57PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:16:52PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > pidhash_shift = max(4, fls(megabytes * 4)); > > pidhash_shift = min(12, pidhash_shift); > > pidhash_size = 1 << pidhas

Re: [PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages.

2006-12-27 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:42:57PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:16:52PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: pidhash_shift = max(4, fls(megabytes * 4)); pidhash_shift = min(12, pidhash_shift); pidhash_size = 1 pidhash_shift; + size = pidhash_size * sizeof

[PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages.

2006-12-25 Thread Paul Mundt
in to account. The following patch attempts to catch the bogus values and round it up to at least 0-order (or down, in the PID hash case). Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- kernel/pid.c| 17 + mm/page_alloc.c |4 2 files changed, 17 insertions

[PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages.

2006-12-25 Thread Paul Mundt
in to account. The following patch attempts to catch the bogus values and round it up to at least 0-order (or down, in the PID hash case). Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- kernel/pid.c| 17 + mm/page_alloc.c |4 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4

[GIT PULL] sh updates

2006-12-12 Thread Paul Mundt
: alarm support. Paul Mundt (18): sh: Reworked swap cache entry encoding for SH-X2 MMU. sh: Shut up csum_ipv6_magic() warnings. sh: push-switch fixups for work_struct API damage. sh: Add uImage and S-rec generation support. sh: landisk board build fixes. sh: Split

[GIT PULL] sh updates

2006-12-12 Thread Paul Mundt
: alarm support. Paul Mundt (18): sh: Reworked swap cache entry encoding for SH-X2 MMU. sh: Shut up csum_ipv6_magic() warnings. sh: push-switch fixups for work_struct API damage. sh: Add uImage and S-rec generation support. sh: landisk board build fixes. sh: Split

[PATCH] smc91x: Kill off excessive versatile hooks.

2006-12-11 Thread Paul Mundt
This looks like a result of too many auto-merges. The CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE case was handled a total of 6 times. This kills 5 of them. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- drivers/net/smc91x.h | 90 --- 1 file changed, 90 del

[PATCH] smc91x: Kill off excessive versatile hooks.

2006-12-11 Thread Paul Mundt
This looks like a result of too many auto-merges. The CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE case was handled a total of 6 times. This kills 5 of them. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- drivers/net/smc91x.h | 90 --- 1 file changed, 90 deletions

Re: why are some of my patches being credited to other "authors"?

2006-12-09 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 07:11:21AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm far more interested in at least knowing what happens to patches > once they enter the system, so i can plan on what kind of cleanup i > can work on next. > Trivial patches tend not to be a priority for most people, especially

Re: why are some of my patches being credited to other authors?

2006-12-09 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 07:11:21AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i'm far more interested in at least knowing what happens to patches once they enter the system, so i can plan on what kind of cleanup i can work on next. Trivial patches tend not to be a priority for most people, especially

workqueue cmpxchg() breakage

2006-12-06 Thread Paul Mundt
The changes in 365970a1ea76d81cb1ad2f652acb605f06dae256 result in cmpxchg() being invoked with bogus sizes with gcc-4.1 on SH, particularly when kernel/workqueue.c:set_wq_data() is left inlined: LD .tmp_vmlinux1 kernel/built-in.o: In function `__cmpxchg':

workqueue cmpxchg() breakage

2006-12-06 Thread Paul Mundt
The changes in 365970a1ea76d81cb1ad2f652acb605f06dae256 result in cmpxchg() being invoked with bogus sizes with gcc-4.1 on SH, particularly when kernel/workqueue.c:set_wq_data() is left inlined: LD .tmp_vmlinux1 kernel/built-in.o: In function `__cmpxchg':

[GIT PULL] sh updates

2006-12-05 Thread Paul Mundt
Please pull from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Which contains: Jamie Lenehan (1): sh: sh775x/titan fixes for irq header changes. Mark Glaisher (1): sh: dma-api channel capability extensions. Paul Mundt (29): sh: SE7206 build fixes

[GIT PULL] sh updates

2006-12-05 Thread Paul Mundt
Please pull from: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Which contains: Jamie Lenehan (1): sh: sh775x/titan fixes for irq header changes. Mark Glaisher (1): sh: dma-api channel capability extensions. Paul Mundt (29): sh: SE7206 build fixes

Re: [PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:50:50PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption > handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of > kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the > kprobe, o

[PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the kprobe, only to be re-enabled in post_kprobe_handler(). However, in the event that the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic.h atomic64_t standardization

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:11:53PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h [snip] > +#if 0 > +/* Atomic add unless is only effective on atomic_t on powerpc (at least) */ > +static inline long atomic_long_add_unless(atomic_long_t *l,

Re: bitmap?_find_free_region and bitmap_full arg doubts

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:10:08PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > The call to bitmap_find_free_region(), in arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4/sq.c > looks bogus: > > page = bitmap_find_free_region(sq_bitmap, 0x0400, >get_order(map->size)); > > It says the

Re: bitmap?_find_free_region and bitmap_full arg doubts

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:10:08PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: The call to bitmap_find_free_region(), in arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4/sq.c looks bogus: page = bitmap_find_free_region(sq_bitmap, 0x0400, get_order(map-size)); It says the bitmap

Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic.h atomic64_t standardization

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:11:53PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h [snip] +#if 0 +/* Atomic add unless is only effective on atomic_t on powerpc (at least) */ +static inline long atomic_long_add_unless(atomic_long_t *l, long

[PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the kprobe, only to be re-enabled in post_kprobe_handler(). However, in the event that the

Re: [PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

2006-11-30 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:50:50PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the kprobe, only to be re

Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace

2005-11-02 Thread Paul Mundt
rent patch instead > of the old one. I really should write this text from scratch instead > of copying it :) > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks. Acked-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpPSx6aOkQR3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace

2005-11-02 Thread Paul Mundt
write this text from scratch instead of copying it :) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks. Acked-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpPSx6aOkQR3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [patch] SH: inotify and ioprio syscalls

2005-08-11 Thread Paul Mundt
/kernel/syscalls.S |5 + > include/asm-sh64/unistd.h |7 ++- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Both look good, thanks. Acked-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpMPGgrepOy4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [patch] SH: inotify and ioprio syscalls

2005-08-11 Thread Paul Mundt
changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Both look good, thanks. Acked-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpMPGgrepOy4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] consolidate sys_ptrace

2005-08-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude > them: alpha, ia64, m32r, parisc, sparc, sparc64. They continue to > keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to add a sh64_ptrace wrapper > because it

Re: [PATCH] consolidate sys_ptrace

2005-08-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude them: alpha, ia64, m32r, parisc, sparc, sparc64. They continue to keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does

Re: [2.6 patch] arch/sh64/Kconfig: doesn't need it's own LOG_BUF_SHIFT

2005-08-08 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:58:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The LOG_BUF_SHIFT from lib/Kconfig.debug is sufficient. > Yes, looks good, thanks. pgpnWELFEEFdt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [2.6 patch] arch/sh64/Kconfig: doesn't need it's own LOG_BUF_SHIFT

2005-08-08 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:58:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: The LOG_BUF_SHIFT from lib/Kconfig.debug is sufficient. Yes, looks good, thanks. pgpnWELFEEFdt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Obsolete files in 2.6 tree

2005-07-21 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:47:32AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > drivers/char/scan_keyb.c > drivers/char/scan_keyb.h These still work, but are meant to be used by other drivers and not standalone. There's a few users of this that haven't been merged yet anyways. pgpyJnEZ3e1or.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Obsolete files in 2.6 tree

2005-07-21 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:47:32AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: drivers/char/scan_keyb.c drivers/char/scan_keyb.h These still work, but are meant to be used by other drivers and not standalone. There's a few users of this that haven't been merged yet anyways. pgpyJnEZ3e1or.pgp Description: PGP

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Still, for basic compile testing and testing patches on other > architectures it would be nice, when the patch writer can test his/her > patch with a simple defconfig, without knowing a common platform for > this target arch. This is

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:02:53PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Some archs seem to provide defconfigs for various different platforms, > which seems nice, and there seems to be some sort of framework for > doing this, but ... > For most of the architectures aimed at embedded systems, having an

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:02:53PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: Some archs seem to provide defconfigs for various different platforms, which seems nice, and there seems to be some sort of framework for doing this, but ... For most of the architectures aimed at embedded systems, having an

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: Still, for basic compile testing and testing patches on other architectures it would be nice, when the patch writer can test his/her patch with a simple defconfig, without knowing a common platform for this target arch. This is what

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-26 Thread Paul Mundt
t use a different value (at least for the ones using generic hardirqs, ia64 seems to be the only one?). Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-sh/thread_info.h: needs update include/asm-sh

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-26 Thread Paul Mundt
to be the only one?). Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] include/asm-sh/thread_info.h: needs update include/asm-sh64/thread_info.h: needs update Index: include/asm-sh/thread_info.h

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:03:57PM +, Russell King wrote: > > It would be trivial to treat them both as foobar0 and have the > > registration succeed for whoever gets it first, but I could see that this > > would be problematic in the serial8250 case. On the other hand, this is > > then

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:25:08PM +, Russell King wrote: > Eh? How do you end up with "/sys/devices/platform/foobar0.0" for the > former case? It has an ID of "-1", and not zero. Your idea doesn't > make any sense. > Yes, I missed the -1 part, so Kyle is correct. It would be trivial to

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote: > So how would you tell the difference between the following? > device = "foobar0" > id = -1 > path = "/sys/devices/platform/foobar0" > versus > device = "foobar" > id = 0 > path =

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:10:14AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > This might make sense for devices that end in numbers, but does it really > > make sense for devices that don't? > > Then fix those drivers to not put the number in there if they don't have > one :) > But they do have non -1 ids, the

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:34:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number > > Separate platform device name from platform device number such that > names ending with numbers aren't confusing. > This might make sense for devices that

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:34:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number Separate platform device name from platform device number such that names ending with numbers aren't confusing. This might make sense for devices that end

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:10:14AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: This might make sense for devices that end in numbers, but does it really make sense for devices that don't? Then fix those drivers to not put the number in there if they don't have one :) But they do have non -1 ids, the device

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote: So how would you tell the difference between the following? device = foobar0 id = -1 path = /sys/devices/platform/foobar0 versus device = foobar id = 0 path = /sys/devices/platform/foobar0

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:25:08PM +, Russell King wrote: Eh? How do you end up with /sys/devices/platform/foobar0.0 for the former case? It has an ID of -1, and not zero. Your idea doesn't make any sense. Yes, I missed the -1 part, so Kyle is correct. It would be trivial to treat

Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number

2005-03-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:03:57PM +, Russell King wrote: It would be trivial to treat them both as foobar0 and have the registration succeed for whoever gets it first, but I could see that this would be problematic in the serial8250 case. On the other hand, this is then serial8250's

Re: 2.6.11-mm4

2005-03-17 Thread Paul Mundt
em_ptr' drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x628): In function `write_kmem': mem.c: undefined reference to `xlate_dev_kmem_ptr' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 include/asm-sh/io.h | 11 +++ include/asm-sh64/io.h | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt &

Re: 2.6.11-mm4

2005-03-17 Thread Paul Mundt
/built-in.o(.text+0x628): In function `write_kmem': mem.c: undefined reference to `xlate_dev_kmem_ptr' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 include/asm-sh/io.h | 11 +++ include/asm-sh64/io.h | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.6.11-mm2

2005-03-08 Thread Paul Mundt
With the BUG_ON() use in linux/list.h I get this: CC init/initramfs.o In file included from include/linux/wait.h:23, from include/linux/fs.h:205, from init/initramfs.c:2: include/linux/list.h: In function `list_del': include/linux/list.h:164: warning:

Re: 2.6.11-mm2

2005-03-08 Thread Paul Mundt
With the BUG_ON() use in linux/list.h I get this: CC init/initramfs.o In file included from include/linux/wait.h:23, from include/linux/fs.h:205, from init/initramfs.c:2: include/linux/list.h: In function `list_del': include/linux/list.h:164: warning:

Re: RFC: disallow modular framebuffers

2005-03-02 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Do modular framebuffers really make sense? > Yes, at least these are quite common with embedded systems, quite often without fbcon. It makes little sense to keep the driver constantly loaded if the device is not being used as a

Re: RFC: disallow modular framebuffers

2005-03-02 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Do modular framebuffers really make sense? Yes, at least these are quite common with embedded systems, quite often without fbcon. It makes little sense to keep the driver constantly loaded if the device is not being used as a console

[PATCH] Add as-option to top-level Makefile

2005-02-06 Thread Paul Mundt
cc-option can presently not be used for checking as flags. It seems like MIPS ran into this already and added their own as-option (which at this point seems to be completely unused on MIPS, so perhaps it's worth removing entirely from there). This patch moves the definition to the top-level

[PATCH] Add as-option to top-level Makefile

2005-02-06 Thread Paul Mundt
cc-option can presently not be used for checking as flags. It seems like MIPS ran into this already and added their own as-option (which at this point seems to be completely unused on MIPS, so perhaps it's worth removing entirely from there). This patch moves the definition to the top-level

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-02-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: > > Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again: > > > > drivers/sh/Makefile |6 > > drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-02-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:30:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:23:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > drivers/sh/Makefile |6 > > > > drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile |7 +

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-02-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:30:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:23:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: drivers/sh/Makefile |6 drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile |7 +

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-02-01 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again: drivers/sh/Makefile |6 drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile |7 + drivers/sh

Re: Fwd: Re: flush_cache_page()

2005-01-28 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:36:52PM +, Russell King wrote: > However, since it's been rather a long time, I will need to go > back and redo this patch, along with all the other patches which > get ARMv6 VIPT aliasing caches working, and then confirm that this > does indeed end up with something

Re: Fwd: Re: flush_cache_page()

2005-01-28 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:36:52PM +, Russell King wrote: However, since it's been rather a long time, I will need to go back and redo this patch, along with all the other patches which get ARMv6 VIPT aliasing caches working, and then confirm that this does indeed end up with something

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-01-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: > > Did you forget a .h file with these function prototypes? > > > Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again: > I haven't heard anything else from you about this since the last update, do you have any more iss

Re: [PATCH] use generic hardirq code on SH

2005-01-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 01:21:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > (forgot to mention that I'd like to thank Tom Rini for testing the > patch on his Hitachi SE7750 and correcting two stupid little bugs) > Looks good, I'll apply it, thanks. pgp6iGuyeaWYx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] use generic hardirq code on SH

2005-01-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 01:21:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: (forgot to mention that I'd like to thank Tom Rini for testing the patch on his Hitachi SE7750 and correcting two stupid little bugs) Looks good, I'll apply it, thanks. pgp6iGuyeaWYx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] SuperHyway bus support

2005-01-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: Did you forget a .h file with these function prototypes? Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again: I haven't heard anything else from you about this since the last update, do you have any more issues with this code

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
m to recall Gates starting up a foundation for such things, and donating money to charity. While I may not like alot of the things that MS does, or care for how Gates does business, I'm still not going to try and blame the worlds problems on him simply because he does some things I don't like.

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
Also, say for some reason you are "forced" into working temporarily for such a company to pay the bills.. nothing is stopping you from looking for alternate means of employment. Seems to me you just want the quick and easy way out, and refuse to admit the possibility that there are other options

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
ieve that I have been "damaged" by M$. > Oh please, next you'll be blaming world hunger on MS because third world countries can't afford licenses of win2k. Regards, -- Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
be blaming world hunger on MS because third world countries can't afford licenses of win2k. Regards, -- Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
for alternate means of employment. Seems to me you just want the quick and easy way out, and refuse to admit the possibility that there are other options. Just because you haven't taken the time to look at them, doesn't mean they don't exist. Regards, -- Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!

2001-07-01 Thread Paul Mundt
, and donating money to charity. While I may not like alot of the things that MS does, or care for how Gates does business, I'm still not going to try and blame the worlds problems on him simply because he does some things I don't like. Regards, -- Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from

Re: sis630 - help needed debugging in the kernel

2001-06-18 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:58:17PM -0700, James Simmons wrote: > > Yep, in fbmem.c the name entry is "sisfb" as opposed to just "sis". > > Agh!!! That needs to be fixed. > I've already fixed it in ruby.. Regards, -- Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: sis630 - help needed debugging in the kernel

2001-06-18 Thread Paul Mundt
(). Take a look at drivers/video/sis/sis_main.h, specifically sisbios_mode[] for a list of supported modes. Something like: video=sisfb:mode:640x480x32 should do the job. Regards, -- Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: sis630 - help needed debugging in the kernel

2001-06-18 Thread Paul Mundt
: video=sisfb:mode:640x480x32 should do the job. Regards, -- Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ

Re: sis630 - help needed debugging in the kernel

2001-06-18 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:58:17PM -0700, James Simmons wrote: Yep, in fbmem.c the name entry is sisfb as opposed to just sis. Agh!!! That needs to be fixed. I've already fixed it in ruby.. Regards, -- Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

<    4   5   6   7   8   9