ort to legal action ended amicably,
but we still had heated conversation whether I did or didn't alienate
my right for attribution and copyright.
On 23 October 2017 at 10:50, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:16:12PM +0300, Pavel Nikulin wrote:
>> If you
ort to legal action ended amicably,
but we still had heated conversation whether I did or didn't alienate
my right for attribution and copyright.
On 23 October 2017 at 10:50, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:16:12PM +0300, Pavel Nikulin wrote:
>> If you say that your lawyers have
ome US states) if doing so is needed to harm companies hiding
behind proxy entities, "clouds," ones persistent in using vexatious
deference tactics, or simply ones believing that they loose nothing
if they try to challenge every request for GPL compliance.
On 20 October 2017 at 21:25, Alan Co
ome US states) if doing so is needed to harm companies hiding
behind proxy entities, "clouds," ones persistent in using vexatious
deference tactics, or simply ones believing that they loose nothing
if they try to challenge every request for GPL compliance.
On 20 October 2017 at 21:25, Alan Cox
Hold!
Greg, are you trying to put a new addendum to the terms of GPL v2?
I read the FAQ you posted, having you writing in that FAQ that this is
not a change to license terms is not enough. Modification of GPL V2
terms are explicitly disallowed. IF you want to put such writing into
kernel, a very
Hold!
Greg, are you trying to put a new addendum to the terms of GPL v2?
I read the FAQ you posted, having you writing in that FAQ that this is
not a change to license terms is not enough. Modification of GPL V2
terms are explicitly disallowed. IF you want to put such writing into
kernel, a very
6 matches
Mail list logo
