Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:04:28AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > How many physical PCI slots on a Tsunami system? (I know the
>
> on tsunamis probably not many, but on a Typhoon (the one in the es40
> that is the 4-way extension) I don't know, but certainly the box
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:04:28AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
How many physical PCI slots on a Tsunami system? (I know the
on tsunamis probably not many, but on a Typhoon (the one in the es40
that is the 4-way extension) I don't know, but certainly the box is
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> Peter Rival writes:
> > Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking
> > about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS & SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that
> > they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet...
>
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> J Sloan writes:
> > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
> > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup
> > with a special web cache in front of iis.
>
> I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers
> got
David S. Miller wrote:
Peter Rival writes:
Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking
about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that
they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet...
Sorry, they are there in the table, but marked
David S. Miller wrote:
J Sloan writes:
Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
an all-out, bet the farm, benchmark buster setup
with a special web cache in front of iis.
I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers
got disqualified and aren't
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find som
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support? Especially with
systems with Chipkill coming out, this would be great to support...
- Pete
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
>
>
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support? Especially with
systems with Chipkill coming out, this would be great to support...
- Pete
Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi,
You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
http://samba.org/~anton/patches/cpu_hotswap-2.4.3-patch
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
finding all
Hmpf. Haven't seen this at all on any of the Alphas that I'm running. What
exact system are you seeing this on, and what are you running when it happens?
- Pete
Bob McElrath wrote:
> Peter Rival [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > You wouldn't happen to have khttpd loaded as a module,
You wouldn't happen to have khttpd loaded as a module, would you? I've seen
this type of problem caused by that before...
- Pete
Bob McElrath wrote:
> I've been experiencing a particular kind of hang for many versions
> (since 2.3.99 days, recently seen with 2.4.1, 2.4.2, and 2.4.2-ac4) on
>
You wouldn't happen to have khttpd loaded as a module, would you? I've seen
this type of problem caused by that before...
- Pete
Bob McElrath wrote:
I've been experiencing a particular kind of hang for many versions
(since 2.3.99 days, recently seen with 2.4.1, 2.4.2, and 2.4.2-ac4) on
Hmpf. Haven't seen this at all on any of the Alphas that I'm running. What
exact system are you seeing this on, and what are you running when it happens?
- Pete
Bob McElrath wrote:
Peter Rival [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
You wouldn't happen to have khttpd loaded as a module, would you
Doug, could you check how this patch works if you have the qla2x00 installed in an
Alpha box? I'm hoping this is part of the source of my problems, but I'm not
positive. (I'd do it, but my system is running benchmarks for the next several
days.) Thanks!
- Pete
Doug Ledford wrote:
>
Doug, could you check how this patch works if you have the qla2x00 installed in an
Alpha box? I'm hoping this is part of the source of my problems, but I'm not
positive. (I'd do it, but my system is running benchmarks for the next several
days.) Thanks!
- Pete
Doug Ledford wrote:
Ishikawa
Yeah, I've been bitten by this quite often. Basically, just edit
arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile and remove irq_pyxis.c from the obj-y
line. I'm not positive what systems require it exactly, but rawhide isn't one of
them. I have a totally separate patch from Andrea
that suggests (to my mind) that
Yeah, I've been bitten by this quite often. Basically, just edit
arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile and remove irq_pyxis.c from the obj-y
line. I'm not positive what systems require it exactly, but rawhide isn't one of
them. I have a totally separate patch from Andrea
that suggests (to my mind) that
_PC+0xf040> fc81ba80
Aiee, killing interrupt handler
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task!
2 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable.
Peter Rival wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just lent a QLogic ISP2200 FC adapter and have been having a
> bear o
handler
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task!
2 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable.
Peter Rival wrote:
Hi,
I was just lent a QLogic ISP2200 FC adapter and have been having a
bear of a time trying to get it to work on my Alpha ES40 and GS80.
I've tried both
Hi,
I was just lent a QLogic ISP2200 FC adapter and have been having a
bear of a time trying to get it to work on my Alpha ES40 and GS80. I've
tried both the qlogicfc (with standard kernel) and qla2x00 (from QLogic
and Compaq) driver both built-in and as modules but neither of them are
Hi,
I was just lent a QLogic ISP2200 FC adapter and have been having a
bear of a time trying to get it to work on my Alpha ES40 and GS80. I've
tried both the qlogicfc (with standard kernel) and qla2x00 (from QLogic
and Compaq) driver both built-in and as modules but neither of them are
Hi Phil,
Phillip Ezolt wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
>WorkStation 600au).
>
> When starting up, we get a machine check after initialing the qlogic SCSI code.
>
> Using the Alpha kgdb, we figured out that the code is dying
Hi Phil,
Phillip Ezolt wrote:
Hi All,
Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
WorkStation 600au).
When starting up, we get a machine check after initialing the qlogic SCSI code.
Using the Alpha kgdb, we figured out that the code is dying in
bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 05:28:49PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > Memory: 23824288k available (1352k kernel code, 240k data, 72k init)
>[f800,0012ffc9a000]
>
> This must be some kind of record.
>
Sorry...check the post I made a few hours ago. Unless I
Hi all,
Well, I'm finally getting around to sending out this announcement.
As can be seen on www.alphanews.net, we've managed to boot Linux on an
AlphaServer GS320. The only caveats are that one of the CPUs was out of
the system at the time (hence 31 CPUs, not 32), and that we haven't yet
Hi all,
Well, I'm finally getting around to sending out this announcement.
As can be seen on www.alphanews.net, we've managed to boot Linux on an
AlphaServer GS320. The only caveats are that one of the CPUs was out of
the system at the time (hence 31 CPUs, not 32), and that we haven't yet
bert hubert wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 05:28:49PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Memory: 23824288k available (1352k kernel code, 240k data, 72k init)
[f800,0012ffc9a000]
This must be some kind of record.
Sorry...check the post I made a few hours ago. Unless I count
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Henry Worth wrote:
>
>
> > Or is it all, whatever there may be of it, taking
> > place offline?
>
> Most of the times I've talked about this topic it
> was in person with other developers at various
> conferences.
>
Ugh, no wonder I never see this.
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Henry Worth wrote:
snip
Or is it all, whatever there may be of it, taking
place offline?
Most of the times I've talked about this topic it
was in person with other developers at various
conferences.
Ugh, no wonder I never see this. Guess it's
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> Someone tell Rik to get his hands on a copy of AIMS-7 and start
> benchmarking his VM so when the SCO Unix numbers hit the street, we've
> got a rebuttal and fix dates to tell folks.
>
That's going to be tough - AIM as a company is out of business (just go to
31 matches
Mail list logo
