[uPATCH] a logitech mouse ID

2007-05-08 Thread Peter Samuelson
n". Signed-Off-By: Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/input/mouse/logips2pp.c +++ drivers/input/mouse/logips2pp.c @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ { 66, PS2PP_KIND_MX, /* MX3100 reciver */ PS2PP_WHEEL | PS2PP

[uPATCH] a logitech mouse ID

2007-05-08 Thread Peter Samuelson
Adds the ID to recognise my PS/2 TrackMan Marble. This is purely cosmetic: this is standard 3-button, no wheel or other such features, so it already _worked_ just fine. This patch suppresses a warning about the unknown model, and changes the printk from Mouse to TrackMan. Signed-Off-By: Peter

[powerpc] RS/6000 43p-150 no longer boots as of 2.6.18

2007-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
I know this is a bit late to be reporting this, as it happened before 2.6.18, but my PowerPC CHRP machine (RS/6000 43p-150, 604e CPU) no longer boots. From the console: instantiating rtas at 0x1ffe5000 ... done copying OF device tree ... Building dt strings... Building dt structure...

[powerpc] RS/6000 43p-150 no longer boots as of 2.6.18

2007-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
I know this is a bit late to be reporting this, as it happened before 2.6.18, but my PowerPC CHRP machine (RS/6000 43p-150, 604e CPU) no longer boots. From the console: instantiating rtas at 0x1ffe5000 ... done copying OF device tree ... Building dt strings... Building dt structure...

Re: [uPATCH] cross-compile scripts/lxdialog/ on AIX

2005-02-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > AIX curses.h defines macros 'clear_screen' and 'color_names' but does > not define 'scroll()'. I should mention that 'make menuconfig' on AIX 4.3 also required 'ln -s libxcurses.a /usr/lib/libncurses.a' but a patch to detect *that* seemed too intrusive to be worthwhile.

Re: [uPATCH] cross-compile scripts/lxdialog/ on AIX

2005-02-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] AIX curses.h defines macros 'clear_screen' and 'color_names' but does not define 'scroll()'. I should mention that 'make menuconfig' on AIX 4.3 also required 'ln -s libxcurses.a /usr/lib/libncurses.a' but a patch to detect *that* seemed too intrusive to be worthwhile. Also

[uPATCH] cross-compile scripts/lxdialog/ on AIX

2005-02-26 Thread Peter Samuelson
AIX curses.h defines macros 'clear_screen' and 'color_names' but does not define 'scroll()'. Signed-Off-By: Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c.old 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c --- 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c.old 2

[uPATCH] cross-compile scripts/lxdialog/ on AIX

2005-02-26 Thread Peter Samuelson
AIX curses.h defines macros 'clear_screen' and 'color_names' but does not define 'scroll()'. Signed-Off-By: Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c.old 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c --- 2.6.11-rc5/scripts/lxdialog/checklist.c.old 2005-02-27

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH] automatic multi-part link rules (fwd)

2001-05-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] > However, I don't think it's hard to verify that my patch works as > well, it's about ten lines added to Rules.make. It's particularly > easy to verify that it doesn't change behavior for objects listed in > $(list-multi) at all. Yes, we can say this, but people are right

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH] automatic multi-part link rules (fwd)

2001-05-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] However, I don't think it's hard to verify that my patch works as well, it's about ten lines added to Rules.make. It's particularly easy to verify that it doesn't change behavior for objects listed in $(list-multi) at all. Yes, we can say this, but people are right to

Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka "I stick my neck out a mile..."

2001-04-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] > Besides, right now the configurator has a simple invariant. It will > only accept consistent configurations So you are saying that the old 'vi .config; make oldconfig' trick is officially unsupported? That's too bad, it was quite handy. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka I stick my neck out a mile...

2001-04-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] Besides, right now the configurator has a simple invariant. It will only accept consistent configurations So you are saying that the old 'vi .config; make oldconfig' trick is officially unsupported? That's too bad, it was quite handy. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [upatch] lib/Makefile

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > > Introduced in 2.4.4pre4, I believe. $(export-objs) need not be > > conditional, and the if statement was not really correct either, > > although in this case it probably worked. [Tom Rini] > Er, are you sure changing the test for !"nn"

[upatch] lib/Makefile

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
Introduced in 2.4.4pre4, I believe. $(export-objs) need not be conditional, and the if statement was not really correct either, although in this case it probably worked. Peter --- 2.4.4pre6/lib/Makefile~ Mon Apr 23 09:51:17 2001 +++ 2.4.4pre6/lib/Makefile Mon Apr 23 17:11:04 2001 @@

[upatch] lib/Makefile

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
Introduced in 2.4.4pre4, I believe. $(export-objs) need not be conditional, and the if statement was not really correct either, although in this case it probably worked. Peter --- 2.4.4pre6/lib/Makefile~ Mon Apr 23 09:51:17 2001 +++ 2.4.4pre6/lib/Makefile Mon Apr 23 17:11:04 2001 @@

Re: [upatch] lib/Makefile

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] Introduced in 2.4.4pre4, I believe. $(export-objs) need not be conditional, and the if statement was not really correct either, although in this case it probably worked. [Tom Rini] Er, are you sure changing the test for !nn is correct here? I _think_ at least

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: Cross-referencing frenzy

2001-04-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] > > CONFIG_SOUND_YMPCI: arch/ppc/configs/power3_defconfig >arch/arm/def-configs/footbridge arch/arm/def-configs/rpc arch/arm/def-configs/lart >arch/arm/def-configs/shark [jgarzik] > typo, that should be ...YMFPCI. Actually it's not a typo (although the fix is the same). The old

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: Cross-referencing frenzy

2001-04-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] CONFIG_SOUND_YMPCI: arch/ppc/configs/power3_defconfig arch/arm/def-configs/footbridge arch/arm/def-configs/rpc arch/arm/def-configs/lart arch/arm/def-configs/shark [jgarzik] typo, that should be ...YMFPCI. Actually it's not a typo (although the fix is the same). The old

Re: CML2 1.1.3 is available

2001-04-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Cowan] > The whole point of CML2 is to make kernel configuration something > that Aunt Tillie (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) can do, and we > are all Aunt Tillies from time to time. That includes differing > standards of readability, Come on, that's absolutely a red herring. There

Re: CML2 1.1.3 is available

2001-04-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Cowan] The whole point of CML2 is to make kernel configuration something that Aunt Tillie (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) can do, and we are all Aunt Tillies from time to time. That includes differing standards of readability, Come on, that's absolutely a red herring. There are

Re: CML2 1.1.3 is available

2001-04-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] > If there were already a library in ths stock Python distribution to > digest .Xdefaults files I might consider this. Perhaps I'll write > one. But I'm not going to bulk up the CML2 code with this marginal > feature. Wait ... I thought you were just using Python bindings to Tk. Are you

Re: CML2 1.1.3 is available

2001-04-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] If there were already a library in ths stock Python distribution to digest .Xdefaults files I might consider this. Perhaps I'll write one. But I'm not going to bulk up the CML2 code with this marginal feature. Wait ... I thought you were just using Python bindings to Tk. Are you

Re: CML1 cleanup patch

2001-03-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeff Garzik] > > It stays "8139too". Donald Becker's rtl8139.c continues to exist > > outside the kernel. Honestly, Jeff, I don't see how it matters -- because if you are downloading an external driver, you are not going through the config system anyway. But ... "maintanicus selector est"

Re: CML1 cleanup patch

2001-03-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] > CONFIG_8139TOOCONFIG_RTL8139TOO > CONFIG_8139TOO_PIOCONFIG_RTL8139TOO_PIO > CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER CONFIG_RTL8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER The -TOO suffix was to distinguish between this and the former 8139 driver, as the two coexisted in 2.2 and 2.3.

Re: CML1 cleanup patch

2001-03-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[esr] CONFIG_8139TOOCONFIG_RTL8139TOO CONFIG_8139TOO_PIOCONFIG_RTL8139TOO_PIO CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER CONFIG_RTL8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER The -TOO suffix was to distinguish between this and the former 8139 driver, as the two coexisted in 2.2 and 2.3. As

Re: CML1 cleanup patch

2001-03-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeff Garzik] It stays "8139too". Donald Becker's rtl8139.c continues to exist outside the kernel. Honestly, Jeff, I don't see how it matters -- because if you are downloading an external driver, you are not going through the config system anyway. But ... "maintanicus selector est" (my

Re: Rename all derived CONFIG variables

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Samuelson
[kaos] > In 2.4.2-ac18 there are 130 CONFIG options that are always derived > from other options, the user has no control over them. I've thought about these before ... but never got around to doing anything about them. I agree they should have a separate namespace. However, I would vote the

Re: Rename all derived CONFIG variables

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Samuelson
[kaos] In 2.4.2-ac18 there are 130 CONFIG options that are always derived from other options, the user has no control over them. I've thought about these before ... but never got around to doing anything about them. I agree they should have a separate namespace. However, I would vote the

Re: yacc dependency of aic7xxx driver

2001-03-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jörn Nettingsmeier, quoting Robert Muller] > Just create a shell script called yacc with the following content > --- > #!/bin/sh > bison --yacc $* > --- > i ran into the same problem with a school proiject here yesterday Why does nobody learn shell anymore?

Re: yacc dependency of aic7xxx driver

2001-03-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jörn Nettingsmeier, quoting Robert Muller] Just create a shell script called yacc with the following content --- #!/bin/sh bison --yacc $* --- i ran into the same problem with a school proiject here yesterday Why does nobody learn shell anymore? (Just

Re: Info on adding system calls

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[T.L.Madhu] > I want to add a function defined in my loadeble kernel module as > system call. You can't. At least not without hackery -- anything is possible with a bit of hackery. And there are at least two good reasons for this. First: adding syscalls at runtime is a recipe for chaos in

Re: VFS: Cannot open root device

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeremy Jackson] > try command 'man mkinitrd' under redhat for hints about initial > ramdisk. I have been puzzled about this for quite some time. Why exactly does everyone always recommend using 'mkinitrd' on Red Hat systems? It seems to me that if you are compiling a kernel for a specific

Re: binfmt_script and ^M

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dr. Kelsey Hudson] > umm, last i checked a carriage return wasn't whitespace... space, > horizontal tab, vertical tab, form feed constitute whitespace IIRC... Where and when did you check? Several sources disagree with you. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: binfmt_script and ^M

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeff Coy] > this issue came up frequently with customers uploading scripts in > binary mode trying to run #!/usr/bin/perl^M. The solution for me was > to just do the following: > > cd /usr/bin > sudo ln -s perl^V^M perl So none of your customers tried '#!/usr/bin/perl -w^M'?

Re: binfmt_script and ^M

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeff Coy] this issue came up frequently with customers uploading scripts in binary mode trying to run #!/usr/bin/perl^M. The solution for me was to just do the following: cd /usr/bin sudo ln -s perl^V^M perl So none of your customers tried '#!/usr/bin/perl -w^M'? (Come on,

Re: binfmt_script and ^M

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dr. Kelsey Hudson] umm, last i checked a carriage return wasn't whitespace... space, horizontal tab, vertical tab, form feed constitute whitespace IIRC... Where and when did you check? Several sources disagree with you. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: VFS: Cannot open root device

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeremy Jackson] try command 'man mkinitrd' under redhat for hints about initial ramdisk. I have been puzzled about this for quite some time. Why exactly does everyone always recommend using 'mkinitrd' on Red Hat systems? It seems to me that if you are compiling a kernel for a specific

Re: Info on adding system calls

2001-03-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[T.L.Madhu] I want to add a function defined in my loadeble kernel module as system call. You can't. At least not without hackery -- anything is possible with a bit of hackery. And there are at least two good reasons for this. First: adding syscalls at runtime is a recipe for chaos in

Re: Looking for best resource for device driver programmers

2001-03-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Steven Friedrich] > The questions I have are difficult to research because so little info > exists about 2.4 design philosophy. I guess the ORA "Linux Device Drivers" 2nd edition is due out Real Soon Now. It will cover 2.4. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Looking for best resource for device driver programmers

2001-03-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Steven Friedrich] The questions I have are difficult to research because so little info exists about 2.4 design philosophy. I guess the ORA "Linux Device Drivers" 2nd edition is due out Real Soon Now. It will cover 2.4. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH] Makefile fixes

2001-02-28 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] > +list-multi := fore_200e > +fore_200e-objs := fore200e.o $(FORE200E_FW_OBJS) list-multi := fore_200e.o Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH] Makefile fixes

2001-02-28 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Germaschewski] +list-multi := fore_200e +fore_200e-objs := fore200e.o $(FORE200E_FW_OBJS) list-multi := fore_200e.o Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Memory allocation

2001-02-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ivan Stepnikov] > I tried to call getrlimit(). It shows only 2G available memory and > there is no way to increase it. Right. Architectural limit. There needs to be some room in the address space for kernel stuff, I/O, etc -- in Linux at least, having to play with your page tables every

Re: Memory allocation

2001-02-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ivan Stepnikov] I tried to call getrlimit(). It shows only 2G available memory and there is no way to increase it. Right. Architectural limit. There needs to be some room in the address space for kernel stuff, I/O, etc -- in Linux at least, having to play with your page tables every single

Re: unable to link 2.4.2

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Pierfrancesco Caci] > Hi there, can someone please tell me what's going wrong with my > compilation of 2.4.2 ? Change '-oformat' to '--oformat' 4 places in arch/i386/boot/Makefile. > Binutils 2.10.91.0.2 This version of binutils no longer accepts the old 'ld -oformat' form of

Re: unable to link 2.4.2

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Pierfrancesco Caci] Hi there, can someone please tell me what's going wrong with my compilation of 2.4.2 ? Change '-oformat' to '--oformat' 4 places in arch/i386/boot/Makefile. Binutils 2.10.91.0.2 This version of binutils no longer accepts the old 'ld -oformat' form of

Re: binfmt-464c and 2.4.1

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Drew Bertola] > Feb 23 20:48:24 babylon modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-464c > Although I've looked through the documentation, I can't find any > reference to binfmt-464c. binfmt-464c is ELF -- it means your kernel came across an ELF executable and was unable to execute it so

Re: PROBLEM: loopback block device freezes mount

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jon Hart] > 1. I am unable to mount loopback block devices using kernel 2.4.2. Apparently fixed in -ac3. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: PROBLEM: loopback block device freezes mount

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jon Hart] 1. I am unable to mount loopback block devices using kernel 2.4.2. Apparently fixed in -ac3. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: binfmt-464c and 2.4.1

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Drew Bertola] Feb 23 20:48:24 babylon modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-464c Although I've looked through the documentation, I can't find any reference to binfmt-464c. binfmt-464c is ELF -- it means your kernel came across an ELF executable and was unable to execute it so it

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Boot log for Linux PPC64 on POWER3 hardware

2001-02-22 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Bergner] > The following is a boot log for a 64 bit port of Linux for IBM's 64 > bit PowerPC processors. This log was made on a pSeries model 270 > which uses a POWER3 microprocessor. Impressive. One question, though -- > starting cpu /cpus/PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED] > starting cpu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Boot log for Linux PPC64 on POWER3 hardware

2001-02-22 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Bergner] The following is a boot log for a 64 bit port of Linux for IBM's 64 bit PowerPC processors. This log was made on a pSeries model 270 which uses a POWER3 microprocessor. Impressive. One question, though -- starting cpu /cpus/PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED] starting cpu

Re: Linux-2.4.2

2001-02-21 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Heil] > Which -ac series patch does this match up with or superceed ie should > this be considered superior to -ac19 ? Neither "supercedes" the other -- they are different trees. The -ac series has some patches that Linus may never get because they are experimental, or still buggy. If

Re: [lvm-devel] *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta5 available at www.sistina.com

2001-02-21 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christoph Hellwig] > It would be really good to have something devfs-like just for LVM in > setups that don't use LVM, so we could avoid mounting root read/write ^^^devfs? > for device-creation. For most people, read/write access to /dev is rarely needed -- how often do

Re: [lvm-devel] *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta5 available at www.sistina.com

2001-02-21 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christoph Hellwig] It would be really good to have something devfs-like just for LVM in setups that don't use LVM, so we could avoid mounting root read/write ^^^devfs? for device-creation. For most people, read/write access to /dev is rarely needed -- how often do

Re: Linux-2.4.2

2001-02-21 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Heil] Which -ac series patch does this match up with or superceed ie should this be considered superior to -ac19 ? Neither "supercedes" the other -- they are different trees. The -ac series has some patches that Linus may never get because they are experimental, or still buggy. If you

Re: Different CFLAGS for arch and non-arch files.

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Bergner] > Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction here. > I need to use different CFLAGS options depending on whether > I'm compiling arch dependent code or arch independent code. Use the per-directory $(EXTRA_CFLAGS), and/or the per-file $(CFLAGS_foo.o). See also

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] > The conclusion: it's cannot be implemented without slowdown. Or: it cannot be implemented 100% safely and correctly without slowdown. If you know the use you wish to put this to, and are willing to risk a permission check somewhere being confused momentarily by a non-atomic

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Alan Cox] > There is an assumption in the kernel that only the task changes its > own uid and other related data. Fair enough but could you explain the potential problems? And how is it different from sys_setpriority? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > > Race -- you need to make sure the task_struct doesn't disappear out > > from under you. > > > > Anyway, why not use the interface 'chown uid /proc/pid'? No new > > syscall, no arch-dependent part, no user-space tool, etc. [Martin Dalecki]

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] > > Race -- you need to make sure the task_struct doesn't disappear out > > from under you. > > Yes, but we need a write_lock, not a read_lock. No, it's a read_lock because it is locking the task *list*, which is not being changed. The only thing being changed is data within

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] Race -- you need to make sure the task_struct doesn't disappear out from under you. Yes, but we need a write_lock, not a read_lock. No, it's a read_lock because it is locking the task *list*, which is not being changed. The only thing being changed is data within a

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] Race -- you need to make sure the task_struct doesn't disappear out from under you. Anyway, why not use the interface 'chown uid /proc/pid'? No new syscall, no arch-dependent part, no user-space tool, etc. [Martin Dalecki] Becouse of exactly the same race

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Alan Cox] There is an assumption in the kernel that only the task changes its own uid and other related data. Fair enough but could you explain the potential problems? And how is it different from sys_setpriority? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] The conclusion: it's cannot be implemented without slowdown. Or: it cannot be implemented 100% safely and correctly without slowdown. If you know the use you wish to put this to, and are willing to risk a permission check somewhere being confused momentarily by a non-atomic

Re: Different CFLAGS for arch and non-arch files.

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Bergner] Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction here. I need to use different CFLAGS options depending on whether I'm compiling arch dependent code or arch independent code. Use the per-directory $(EXTRA_CFLAGS), and/or the per-file $(CFLAGS_foo.o). See also

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] > Here is a new syscall. With this you can change the owner of a running > procces. > + if (current->euid) > + return -EPERM; Use capable(). > + p = find_task_by_pid(pid); > + p->fsuid = p->euid = p->suid = p->uid = uid; Race -- you need to

Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Justin Gibbs] > I've verified the driver's functionality on 25 different cards thus > far covering the full range of chips from aic7770->aic7899. That's very good to hear. I know the temptation of only testing on new hardware; that's why I was concerned. > Lots of people here at Adaptec look

Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Justin Gibbs] I've verified the driver's functionality on 25 different cards thus far covering the full range of chips from aic7770-aic7899. That's very good to hear. I know the temptation of only testing on new hardware; that's why I was concerned. Lots of people here at Adaptec look at

Re: [PATCH] new setprocuid syscall

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[BERECZ Szabolcs] Here is a new syscall. With this you can change the owner of a running procces. + if (current-euid) + return -EPERM; Use capable(). + p = find_task_by_pid(pid); + p-fsuid = p-euid = p-suid = p-uid = uid; Race -- you need to make sure

Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation...

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jacob Luna Lundberg] > Just out of curiosity, why can't the specification be along the lines > of a vendor data file saying ``if you want the printer to do x then > say y'' and ``if the printer says x then it means y''. That ought to > add a lot of functionality right there. Think about it.

Re: Linux stifles innovation...

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dennis] > For example, if there were six different companies that marketed > ethernet drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one > to buy..perhaps with different "features" that were of value to > you. Instead, you have crappy GPL code that locks up under load, and > its not

Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Nathan Black] > This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram > and AIC7899 scsi. [...] > I would suggest, if at all possible, putting this in the 2.4.2 > kernel. Have you any idea the breadth of cards and chips that aic7xxx supports? Sure, Justin's driver does great

Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix?

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Manfred Spraul] > > Unless you modify the ABI and pass the array bounds around you won't > > catch such problems, [Eric W. Biederman] > Of course. But this is linux and you have the source. And I did > mention you needed to recompile the libraries your trusted > applications depended on.

Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix?

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Manfred Spraul] Unless you modify the ABI and pass the array bounds around you won't catch such problems, [Eric W. Biederman] Of course. But this is linux and you have the source. And I did mention you needed to recompile the libraries your trusted applications depended on. So by

Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Nathan Black] This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram and AIC7899 scsi. [...] I would suggest, if at all possible, putting this in the 2.4.2 kernel. Have you any idea the breadth of cards and chips that aic7xxx supports? Sure, Justin's driver does great with

Re: Linux stifles innovation...

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dennis] For example, if there were six different companies that marketed ethernet drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one to buy..perhaps with different "features" that were of value to you. Instead, you have crappy GPL code that locks up under load, and its not worth

Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation...

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jacob Luna Lundberg] Just out of curiosity, why can't the specification be along the lines of a vendor data file saying ``if you want the printer to do x then say y'' and ``if the printer says x then it means y''. That ought to add a lot of functionality right there. Think about it. A

Re: lkml subject line

2001-02-14 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Henningsen] > > There *is* a good way to do this, and it would be really nice if > > vger could be taught to do it: add a List-Id: header > > (draft-chandhok-listid-04.txt RFC-to-be, implemented in lots of > > mailing list managers already). [Eli Carter] > Have you looked at the headers

Re: lkml subject line

2001-02-14 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kai Henningsen] There *is* a good way to do this, and it would be really nice if vger could be taught to do it: add a List-Id: header (draft-chandhok-listid-04.txt RFC-to-be, implemented in lots of mailing list managers already). [Eli Carter] Have you looked at the headers in an LK

Re: Software Mestizo Manifesto

2001-02-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[ac] > Vast amounts of debian included code contains suggestions about use. I'll not dispute your word because I know you for an objective person. But I don't remember coming across any such examples at least recently. Maybe I just don't remember them because they didn't sound like, well,

Re: Software Mestizo Manifesto

2001-02-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Roberto Diaz] > > I am trying to make a manifesto in order to attach it to all my > > gpl'd developments.. [Rik van Riel] > Quoted from the GPL: > --- > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the > Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from

Re: Software Mestizo Manifesto

2001-02-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[ac] Vast amounts of debian included code contains suggestions about use. I'll not dispute your word because I know you for an objective person. But I don't remember coming across any such examples at least recently. Maybe I just don't remember them because they didn't sound like, well,

Re: OK to mount multiple FS in one dir?

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael D. Crawford] > I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before. > and they'd all show up as mounted at /mnt in the "mount" command, but > if I unmounted one of them (only tried with the currently visible > one),

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > I have no idea why I invoked ver_linux using "." : I must have seen > it somewhere and just followed it somehow. Who knows. Anyway, the following works in 'bash' at least -- don't know about other shells -- but it's quite a hack Peter ---

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ishikawa] > I just noticed that running > > . /usr/src/linux/script/ver_linux > > prints out strange libc version [...] > I found that if the command "ls" is aliased to "ls -aF" So ... don't use '.' to execute scripts. If there is some documentation somewhere that told you to do

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when ls is aliased.

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ishikawa] I just noticed that running . /usr/src/linux/script/ver_linux prints out strange libc version [...] I found that if the command "ls" is aliased to "ls -aF" So ... don't use '.' to execute scripts. If there is some documentation somewhere that told you to do this,

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when ls is aliased.

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ishikawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]] I have no idea why I invoked ver_linux using "." : I must have seen it somewhere and just followed it somehow. Who knows. Anyway, the following works in 'bash' at least -- don't know about other shells -- but it's quite a hack Peter --- scripts/ver_linux~

Re: OK to mount multiple FS in one dir?

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael D. Crawford] I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before. and they'd all show up as mounted at /mnt in the "mount" command, but if I unmounted one of them (only tried with the currently visible one), then it

Re: rlim_t and DNS?

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Admin Mailing Lists] > i have no bits directory Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/. If you are using libc4 or libc5, it is not surprising if the BIND people didn't notice the problem -- they probably didn't try it.

Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Jasen] > E upon careful reading of the devfs/devfsd documentation, > you'll find that it says to put /sbin/devfsd /dev in amongst the > first lines in rc.sysinit. > In looking through rc.sysinit, / is not mounted rw until much later. Who said anything about *re*-mounting '/'?

Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael J. Dikkema] > > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root > > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm > > thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs > > tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[me] > > Richard Gooch (devfs author, from Australia) to switch to the American > > spelling of the word, for consistency with the rest of the kernel, and [ac] > Pardon > > include/linux/console_struct.h: unsigned char vc_palette[16*3]; /* >Colour palette for VGA+ */ >

Re: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[William Knop] > How can DevFS know which devices to add to /dev/scsi/... without > loading the module and scanning the bus first? Or do you manually > insert the scsi module when you need it? If you do 'cd /dev/scsi', the kernel looks it up and finds it missing, which generates a "lookup"

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeremy M. Dolan] > Disk is spelled 'disk' except for Compact Disc and Digital Versatile > Disc. If it wasn't 3:30 in the morning, a patch would be attached. It wouldn't do any good. Many months ago, Ted Ts'o pleaded with Richard Gooch (devfs author, from Australia) to switch to the American

Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Rupa Schomaker] > In my case, I have two identical Maxtor drives, but they reported > different geometry. [...] > I'm doing RAID1 and it is really nice to have the same geometry so > that the partition info is the same between the two drives. Makes > life easier. If that's what you needed,

Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Rupa Schomaker] In my case, I have two identical Maxtor drives, but they reported different geometry. [...] I'm doing RAID1 and it is really nice to have the same geometry so that the partition info is the same between the two drives. Makes life easier. If that's what you needed, you

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeremy M. Dolan] Disk is spelled 'disk' except for Compact Disc and Digital Versatile Disc. If it wasn't 3:30 in the morning, a patch would be attached. It wouldn't do any good. Many months ago, Ted Ts'o pleaded with Richard Gooch (devfs author, from Australia) to switch to the American

Re: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[William Knop] How can DevFS know which devices to add to /dev/scsi/... without loading the module and scanning the bus first? Or do you manually insert the scsi module when you need it? If you do 'cd /dev/scsi', the kernel looks it up and finds it missing, which generates a "lookup" event

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[me] Richard Gooch (devfs author, from Australia) to switch to the American spelling of the word, for consistency with the rest of the kernel, and [ac] Pardon include/linux/console_struct.h: unsigned char vc_palette[16*3]; /* Colour palette for VGA+ */

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >