Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
However, there's a lot of code and I know that there are bugs in it. I
just want to focus on the kernel-related issue t
Andi Kleen wrote:
"Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Many thanks for any suggestions.
It's a long standing bug reported regularly
Thanks for the re-assurance.
but so far nobody has tracked
it down. That's mostly because most people cannot really repro
Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
However, there's a lot of code and I know that there are bugs in it. I
just want to focus on the kernel-related issue that the strace fragment
that I posted brings up: even if my user code gets completely
Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 01/05/2008 11:31 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Do not remove CCed people.
On 01/05/2008 02:38 AM, Phil Endecott wrote:
timezone go and play with http://demos.anyterm.org/bastet/anyterm.html
while I sleep
Service Temporarily Unavailable
It failed at 0325 GMT thanks to the
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:01:38PM +, Phil Endecott wrote:
struct sockaddr_in client_addr;
socklen_t client_size=sizeof(client_addr);
int connfd = accept(fd,(struct sockaddr*)(&client_addr),&client_size);
if (connfd==-1) {
// [1]
.report error and t
Hi Jiri,
Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 01/04/2008 10:01 PM, Phil Endecott wrote:
Dear Experts,
I have some code like this:
struct sockaddr_in client_addr;
socklen_t client_size=sizeof(client_addr);
int connfd = accept(fd,(struct sockaddr*)(&client_addr),&client_size);
if (connfd==-1) {
Dear Experts,
I have some code like this:
struct sockaddr_in client_addr;
socklen_t client_size=sizeof(client_addr);
int connfd = accept(fd,(struct sockaddr*)(&client_addr),&client_size);
if (connfd==-1) {
// [1]
.report error and terminate..
}
int rc = fcntl(connfd,F_SETFD,FD_CLOEXE
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:20:55PM +, Phil Endecott wrote:
Dear Experts,
NFS doesn't work with inotify (and it looks like it can't, certainly not
before NFS v4.1). However, if I give an NFS filename to
inotify_add_watch(), I don't get an error.
Dear Experts,
NFS doesn't work with inotify (and it looks like it can't, certainly
not before NFS v4.1). However, if I give an NFS filename to
inotify_add_watch(), I don't get an error.
If it indicated an error in this case then I could easily fall back to
some sort of polling. Without an
Jan Blunk wrote:
Maybe the arm backend is somehow broken. AFAIK (and I verfied it on S390 and
i386) the alignment shouldn't change.
To see a difference with your example structs you need to compare these two:
struct wibble1 {
char c;
struct bar1 b1;
};
struct wibble2 {
char c;
struct
Jan Blunck wrote:
On 12/6/06, Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used to think that this:
struct foo {
int a __attribute__((packed));
char b __attribute__((packed));
... more fields, all packed ...
};
was exactly the same as this:
struct foo {
int a;
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:20:41PM +, Phil Endecott wrote:
I used to think that this:
struct foo {
int a __attribute__((packed));
char b __attribute__((packed));
... more fields, all packed ...
};
was exactly the same as this:
struct foo {
int a;
char
Dear All,
I used to think that this:
struct foo {
int a __attribute__((packed));
char b __attribute__((packed));
... more fields, all packed ...
};
was exactly the same as this:
struct foo {
int a;
char b;
... more fields ...
} __attribute__((packed));
but it is not, in a subtle
13 matches
Mail list logo
