REQUEST_SENSE and ide-cd.c

o far, the (2) works well, but how bad is it? I'd greatly appreciate any critical feedback. TIA, Piotr Muszynski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: module for controlling kprobes with /proc

Hello Prasanna, On Apr 4, 2005 5:35 PM, Prasanna S Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why /proc ? Thank you for your remarks. I originally thought of writing a simple CLI app to sit over /proc , do basic sanity checks and be simple to use. > You can use a combination of SysRq key to enter

Re: module for controlling kprobes with /proc

Joel Becker wrote: >> I have programmed a universal module to register/remove kprobes handlers >> by interacting with /proc with simple commands. > > > Looking at your code, I'm thinking you could really use >configfs. With configfs, kernelspace objects are created and controlled >via regula

module for controlling kprobes with /proc

needed. No sanity checks performed. It is miserable, perhaps useful... http://sourceforge.net/projects/kprobmod/ Regards, Piotr Muszynski /* * kprobemod.c -- Control Kprobes by /proc * Copyright (C) 2005 Piotr Muszynski, Tohoku Ricoh Inc. * * This program is free software; you can redistribute