Thanks :)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:44:29PM +0530, Rajat Sharma wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at implementation of init_mount_tree() function and
>> found a discrepancy in list manipulation of mnt_namsespace an
Hi,
I was looking at implementation of init_mount_tree() function and
found a discrepancy in list manipulation of mnt_namsespace and
vfsmount across kernel version 2.6.30. Up till kernel version
2.6.30.x, vfsmount structure was added to the list headed by
mnt_namespace structure just allocated:
l
unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> + for (i = 0; i < req_arr_cnt; i++)
> + /* drop i/o ref to the req */
> + __aio_put_req(ctx, req_arr[i]);
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
>
3 matches
Mail list logo