Re: [PATCH] strtok -> strsep (The Easy Cases)

Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 04.05.01: > In message <01050413055100.00907@golmepha> you write: > > Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell: > > > There are two cases where the substitution is problematic: > > > > Yes, but... > > > > The cases which my patch modifies

Re: [PATCH] strtok - strsep (The Easy Cases)

Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 04.05.01: In message 01050413055100.00907@golmepha you write: Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell: There are two cases where the substitution is problematic: Yes, but... The cases which my patch modifies are of a

[PATCH][RFC] strtoke -> strsep (amifb, atafb, atyfb)

Hi all, I was unable to find out who the maintainers of those three framebuffer drivers are (Amiga, Atari, Mach64) and therefore I'm asking here on lkml. All three of the drivers define a function named strtoke for their private use which does almost the same as strsep (that in turn lives in

[PATCH][RFC] strtoke - strsep (amifb, atafb, atyfb)

Hi all, I was unable to find out who the maintainers of those three framebuffer drivers are (Amiga, Atari, Mach64) and therefore I'm asking here on lkml. All three of the drivers define a function named strtoke for their private use which does almost the same as strsep (that in turn lives in