perf not compiling on 64bit kernel 32bit userspace

2014-05-04 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
CH),x86_64) +ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64) BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/mem-memset-x86-64-asm.o endif -- Riccardo Magliocchetti -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to major

Re: udevd cannot modprobe snd-hda-intel with 3.9.8

2013-06-29 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
Hi Stefan, Il 28/06/2013 22:08, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ha scritto: Hi On Friday 28 June 2013, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: Hello, at boot udev (175-7.2 from debian unstable) blocks for maybe 30 seconds and then gives (handcopied) timeout: killing '/sbin/modpro

[PATCH v3] perf: fix bench numa compilation

2013-06-20 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format=] process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val); ^ Signed-off-by: Riccardo Magliocchetti --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 del

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix bench numa compilation

2013-06-20 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
Hello, Il 19/06/2013 19:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo ha scritto: - process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val); + printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016llx]\n", + pr

[PATCH] perf: fix bench numa compilation

2013-06-17 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format=] process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val); ^ Signed-off-by: Riccardo Magliocchetti --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 del

[PATCH] perf: fix bench numa compilation

2013-06-15 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
signed int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format=] process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val); ^ Signed-off-by: Riccardo Magliocchetti --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Diffed against 3.9.6 but should apply c

perf bench does compile in 3.9.6

2013-06-14 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
Hello, on my 64bit kernel / 32 bit userspace system with libnuma 2.0.8 i get this error on linux 3.9.6: bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare] bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format ‘%

Re: [v2] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead asynchronously

2013-01-10 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
// to be evaluated whether madvise or equivalent is available and // actually useful: See: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sal/osl/unx/file.cxx#n1213 May the same approach be extended to madvise MADV_WILLNEED? thanks, riccardo magliocchetti -- To unsubscribe from this list: se