Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

Andrey Borzenkov wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Daniel Barkalow wrote: Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)? I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or someone, could

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

Daniel Barkalow wrote: Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)? I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or someone, could explain in moderate detail how this might be done. I tried

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

, and the machine then becomes useless: I get journal commit errors if I'm lucky; if I'm not, it just locks up. My system is also using the pata_amd driver. I have not seen these sorts of errors with the 2.6.24 kernels. Richard Heck Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

Andrey Borzenkov wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Daniel Barkalow wrote: Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)? I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or someone, could

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

, and the machine then becomes useless: I get journal commit errors if I'm lucky; if I'm not, it just locks up. My system is also using the pata_amd driver. I have not seen these sorts of errors with the 2.6.24 kernels. Richard Heck Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

Daniel Barkalow wrote: Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)? I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or someone, could explain in moderate detail how this might be done. I tried