.
But your interrupt status register should indicate that it wasn't the
sound device that generated the interrupt...
Matthew, can you try the attached patched and report the output?
You should apply it on a clean 2.4.1 (without the patches Jeff sent you).
Try only sound playback.
Rui Sousa
(See attached file: patch)
patch
1 (without the patches Jeff sent you).
Try only sound playback.
Rui Sousa
(See attached file: patch)
patch
All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a
module. You may
want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the
any of the emu10k1
source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much
time/means to test this
since I'm without a
All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a
module. You may
want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the
any of the emu10k1
source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much
time/means to test this
since I'm without a
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Michael Elkins wrote:
Usb controller is sharing a interrupt with the emu10k1.
For what I know the emu10k1 driver doesn't have any problem
sharing irq's, so I would blame the usb driver...
Rui Sousa
> 00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Michael Elkins wrote:
Usb controller is sharing a interrupt with the emu10k1.
For what I know the emu10k1 driver doesn't have any problem
sharing irq's, so I would blame the usb driver...
Rui Sousa
00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) (prog
d emu10k1 into the kernel, foregoing
> any modules and see if that helps. I will also revert back to
> 2.4.0-test10 as well just to test.
Yes, it would be good to know when the problems started.
> If anyone needs further information,
> let me know.
What is the output of:
/sbin/lspc
c, etc. the worst that happens is sporadic
> skipping. XMMS and mpg123 in use. I've tried the kernel emu10k1 a few
> times but also got similar lockup's.
Which was the latest kernel you tried? A (easy to trigger) deadlock was
fixed around 2.4.0-test...
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from th
and mpg123 in use. I've tried the kernel emu10k1 a few
times but also got similar lockup's.
Which was the latest kernel you tried? A (easy to trigger) deadlock was
fixed around 2.4.0-test...
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
and see if that helps. I will also revert back to
2.4.0-test10 as well just to test.
Yes, it would be good to know when the problems started.
If anyone needs further information,
let me know.
What is the output of:
/sbin/lspci -v
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
or.h it compiled ok.
There were still some stalls but they only lasted a couple of
seconds. The patch did make a difference and for the better.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rui Sousa wrote:
>
> > After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
> > slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that
> > touch the disk, they will stall until one of the f
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rui Sousa wrote:
After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that
touch the disk, they will stall until one of the first two stop.
Could
of
seconds. The patch did make a difference and for the better.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rui Sousa wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
>
> > Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
>
> During audio init I hear
mh->scale, 0);
instead of
((100 - left) * scale) / 100);
I will provide a patch if you agree.
Everything else looks ok but I still need to test it.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
a patch if you agree.
Everything else looks ok but I still need to test it.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Rui Sousa wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
During audio init I hear pops, but then again I heard pops during audio
river has this cleanned up,
you can get it at:
http://opensource.creative.com
> However, there is no audio. Graphic equalisers work (although they're
> out of time in 2.4 - always have been on my machine ) in Xmms though,
Go to Options/Preferences. Select OSS driver output plugin.
> an
://opensource.creative.com
However, there is no audio. Graphic equalisers work (although they're
out of time in 2.4 - always have been on my machine ) in Xmms though,
Go to Options/Preferences. Select OSS driver output plugin.
and the mp3 is actually being played...
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rui Sousa wrote:
>
> > After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
> > slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that
> > touch the disk, they will stall until one of the f
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rui Sousa wrote:
After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that
touch the disk, they will stall until one of the first two stop.
Could
this be
a sign of starvation in the elevator code?
This is a UP machine, 64 Mb, IDE disks, kernel 2.4.0-test9 (final). If I
can help with further details just ask.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
this be
a sign of starvation in the elevator code?
This is a UP machine, 64 Mb, IDE disks, kernel 2.4.0-test9 (final). If I
can help with further details just ask.
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
on IDE.
Rui Sousa
r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id
3 4 0164 1028728 15832 0 0 116 0 172 375 98 2 0
1 5 0164 1060768 15840 0 0 136 0 217 420 97 3 0
1 5 0164948800 15836
on IDE.
Rui Sousa
r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id
3 4 0164 1028728 15832 0 0 116 0 172 375 98 2 0
1 5 0164 1060768 15840 0 0 136 0 217 420 97 3 0
1 5 0164948800 15836
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Hi,
Did any of these lead to an infinite loop in swap_out()?
>
> the attached vmfixes-B2 patch adds the following fixes/cleanups:
>
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Hi,
Did any of these lead to an infinite loop in swap_out()?
the attached vmfixes-B2 patch adds the following fixes/cleanups:
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
but it was the best
I could do.
System:
UP, 64M, IDE.
Rui Sousa
P.S: The stability problems started after the VM patches
were integrated, before running test8 + vm3
(Rik van Riel patches) everything was ok...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
but it was the best
I could do.
System:
UP, 64M, IDE.
Rui Sousa
P.S: The stability problems started after the VM patches
were integrated, before running test8 + vm3
(Rik van Riel patches) everything was ok...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
e this in the menus.
< > Bttv driver. Enable I2C support and I2C bit-banging interfaces
first.
Hmm... Just checked and by the name the "text" statement could probably
be used for this. It's mentioned in the kbuild documentation but
I couldn't find a single instance in the current C
.
The machine is a UP Celeron 366Mhz with 64Mb (no SMP or HIGHMEM configured)
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
32 matches
Mail list logo