On 12/12/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sadly there doesn't seem to be any online archives of the period between
> Linux-activists ending in 1993 and Linux Kernel from 1998. Anyone?
> (I find it amazing that five whole years of history have disappeared
> from the
On 12/11/07, Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good day.
>
> Would some people on x86 (both 32 and 64) be kind enough to compile and run
> the attached program? This is about testing how long I/O port access to port
> 0x80 takes. It measures in CPU cycles so CPU speed is crucial in
On 12/11/07, Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day.
Would some people on x86 (both 32 and 64) be kind enough to compile and run
the attached program? This is about testing how long I/O port access to port
0x80 takes. It measures in CPU cycles so CPU speed is crucial in reporting.
On 12/12/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly there doesn't seem to be any online archives of the period between
Linux-activists ending in 1993 and Linux Kernel from 1998. Anyone?
(I find it amazing that five whole years of history have disappeared
from the net).
I
On 11/12/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (push '("/Kbuild" . makefile-mode) auto-mode-alist)
>
> Does that work for Kbuild.asm too, more to the point?
Of course. It works for any filename beginni
On 11/12/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:34:40 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > +# -*- makefile -*-
> > >
> > > what's that?
> >
> > Ah... That tells emacs that it's a makefile. In
On 11/12/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:34:40 + David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+# -*- makefile -*-
what's that?
Ah... That tells emacs that it's a makefile. In Kbuild.asm emacs thinks
its
On 11/12/07, David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SL Baur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(push '(/Kbuild . makefile-mode) auto-mode-alist)
Does that work for Kbuild.asm too, more to the point?
Of course. It works for any filename beginning with the string Kbuild. Major
mode rules
On 8/24/07, SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the
> error message is wrong.
I mean the error message is badly worded. That's bad C and the
macro needs deletion a lot more than it needs an extra set of parens.
Been chasing a heisen bug too long. Need sleep.
On 8/24/07, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > in some code that does like:
> > #define foo { a, b, c, \
> > d, e, f, g }
> > ...
> > int boo[] = foo;
> > ...
> >
> > checkpatch.pl throws a fit:
> > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in
On 8/24/07, Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
in some code that does like:
#define foo { a, b, c, \
d, e, f, g }
...
int boo[] = foo;
...
checkpatch.pl throws a fit:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
#10: FILE:
On 8/24/07, SL Baur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the
error message is wrong.
I mean the error message is badly worded. That's bad C and the
macro needs deletion a lot more than it needs an extra set of parens.
Been chasing a heisen bug too long. Need sleep. Sorry.
-sb
-
To unsubscribe
On 7/24/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are more important things than exploiting the corner cases of
codingstyle, e.g. could you teach checkpatch.pl to give exactly two
errors for the following code?
while (a);
for (b = 0; b < 50; b++);
On 7/24/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are more important things than exploiting the corner cases of
codingstyle, e.g. could you teach checkpatch.pl to give exactly two
errors for the following code?
while (a);
for (b = 0; b 50; b++);
On 6/19/07, Dave Neuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was Apache. Apache showed corporate users and small businesses
desperate to cash in on the Interweb c. 1995-1998 ...
Right time period ...
Linux was a tool for UNIX sysadmins and admin wannabes to
practice their UNIX chops at home - or a
Sure, but was it Linux in embedded devices that made Linux what it is today,
or was it GNU/Linux?
No, it was the fact that Linux has always been able to run on garbage.
My introduction to Linux was in 1995 when I was given a network
of computers made out of back-laboratory garbage and US$0
Sure, but was it Linux in embedded devices that made Linux what it is today,
or was it GNU/Linux?
No, it was the fact that Linux has always been able to run on garbage.
My introduction to Linux was in 1995 when I was given a network
of computers made out of back-laboratory garbage and US$0
On 6/19/07, Dave Neuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was Apache. Apache showed corporate users and small businesses
desperate to cash in on the Interweb c. 1995-1998 ...
Right time period ...
Linux was a tool for UNIX sysadmins and admin wannabes to
practice their UNIX chops at home - or a
18 matches
Mail list logo
