On 2021/4/19 21:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.114 release.
There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
Hi Santosh,
Thanks for your review, and sorry for my mistake. I will send the v2 soon.
On 2021/4/20 14:35, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
Hi Zou,
Zou Wei writes:
The sparse tool complains as follows:
tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c:65:14: warning:
symbol '__nfit_test_ioremap' was not
On 2021/4/15 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/15 22:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.231 release.
There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/15 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.188 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/15 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.113 release.
There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/14 14:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.4.112 kernel.
All users of the 5.4 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.4.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.4.y
and can be
On 2021/4/14 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.187 kernel.
All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.19.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.19.y
and can
On 2021/4/14 14:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.10.30 kernel.
All users of the 5.10 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.10.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.10.y
and can
On 2021/4/12 16:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.187 release.
There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/12 16:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.112 release.
There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/12 16:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release.
There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/9 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.29 release.
There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/9 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.111 release.
There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/7 21:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.10.28 kernel.
All users of the 5.10 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.10.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.10.y
and can
On 2021/4/7 19:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.185 kernel.
All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.19.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.19.y
and can
On 2021/4/7 19:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.14.229 kernel.
All users of the 4.14 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.14.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.14.y
and can
On 2021/4/7 21:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.4.110 kernel.
All users of the 5.4 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.4.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.4.y
and can be
On 2021/4/5 16:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.185 release.
There are 56 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/5 16:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.28 release.
There are 126 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/5 16:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.229 release.
There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/4/5 16:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.110 release.
There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/29 15:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.109 release.
There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/29 18:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release.
There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/24 18:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.183 kernel.
All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.19.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.19.y
and can
On 2021/3/24 18:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 4.14.227 kernel.
All users of the 4.14 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 4.14.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-4.14.y
and can
On 2021/3/24 18:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.4.108 kernel.
All users of the 5.4 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.4.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.4.y
and can be
On 2021/3/25 16:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I'm announcing the release of the 5.10.26 kernel.
All users of the 5.10 kernel series must upgrade.
The updated 5.10.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
linux-5.10.y
and can
On 2021/3/24 17:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
There are 150 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/22 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.227 release.
There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/22 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.183 release.
There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/22 23:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/22 20:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.108 release.
There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/22 23:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.26 release.
There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/19 20:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.107 release.
There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/19 20:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.182 release.
There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/19 20:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/15 21:51, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release.
There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/15 21:55, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.181 release.
There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
On 2021/3/15 21:56, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.226 release.
There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/15 21:55, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.181 release.
There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
On 2021/3/17 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:35:36PM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
On 2021/3/15 21:56, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.226 release.
There are 95 patches in this series, all
On 2021/3/15 21:55, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.181 release.
There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
On 2021/3/15 21:53, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release.
There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/15 21:51, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release.
There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/15 21:56, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.226 release.
There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/10 21:24, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.105 release.
There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/10 21:24, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.180 release.
There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/10 21:23, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
On 2021/3/8 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.104 release.
There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/8 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.22 release.
There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/5 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.21 release.
There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/5 20:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.179 release.
There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 2021/3/5 20:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.103 release.
There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021 20:28:20 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.178 release.
There are 246 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021 20:28:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.20 release.
There are 657 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
On Tue, 02 Mar 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.102 release.
There are 337 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Hi Peter,
I'm sorry for my mistake.
Thanks for your comments and suggestions.
On 2020/5/14 16:33, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/2020 12.25, Samuel Zou wrote:
Fixes coccicheck warnings:
drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1294:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
drivers/dma/ti/k3
-Mode support")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c
index 5455fc9..58236c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-om
d-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
arch/arm/mach-zx/platsmp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zx/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-zx/platsmp.c
index d4e1d37..43a33ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zx/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zx/platsmp.c
@@ -
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'msm_iommu_lock' was not
declared.
The msm_iommu_lock has only call site within msm_iommu.c
It should be static
Fixes: 0720d1f052dc ("msm: Add MSM IOMMU support")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-
)
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
index 37f3db6..aa071d9 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
+++
atmel_usba_udc.c
They should be static
Fixes: 914a3f3b3754 ("USB: add atmel_usba_udc driver")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usb
input driver")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/tegra210.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/tegra210.c
b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/tegra210.c
index 2045609..3baa
arger")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/power/supply/bd99954-charger.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bd99954-charger.c
b/drivers/power/supply/bd99954-charger.c
index 3da39c7..ffd8bfa 100644
--- a/dri
variables.
Fixes: 2c53d0f64c06 ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_
early")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
kernel/livepatch/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
index 96d2da1..f76fdb9 100644
--- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
+++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
, 2020 at 10:53:41AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:06:34PM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
Fix the following sparse warning:
kernel/livepatch/core.c:748:5: warning: symbol 'klp_apply_object_relocs'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Yes, it should :-)
So instead
Fix the following sparse warning:
kernel/livepatch/core.c:748:5: warning: symbol 'klp_apply_object_relocs'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
kernel/livepatch/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c:468:6: warning: variable ‘prev_time’ set
but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
u32 prev_time = 0;
^
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/net/dsa/sja1105
Fix the following versioncheck warning:
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_debugfs.c:16:1: unused including
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_debugfs.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_debugfs.c
b
Hi Mike,
You are right.
I did not notice that the macro DMEMIT uses the sz variable.
Thanks.
On 2020/5/7 22:29, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Thu, May 07 2020 at 8:26am -0400,
Samuel Zou wrote:
This patch fixes below warning reported by coccicheck:
drivers/md/dm-historical-service-time.c:240:14
This patch fixes below warning reported by coccicheck:
drivers/md/dm-historical-service-time.c:240:14-16: Unneeded variable: "sz".
Return "0" on line 261
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/md/dm-historical-service-time.c | 3 +--
1 file change
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c:343:5: warning:
symbol 'sdhci_pci_gli_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
Fix the following coccinelle warning:
sound/drivers/portman2x4.c:460:34-35: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks,
consider |
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/drivers
of probable
bitmasks, consider |
sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c:194:39-40: WARNING: sum of probable
bitmasks, consider |
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc
Both of you are right.
I neglected, and this patch is wrong.
Thanks.
On 2020/5/6 23:15, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 16:51 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 20:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 11:07 +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
This silences
Fix the following coccinelle warnings:
sound/ppc/pmac.c:729:57-58: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
sound/ppc/pmac.c:229:37-38: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
sound/ppc/pmac.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1136:5: warning:
symbol 'tda998x_audio_digital_mute' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c:564:6: warning:
symbol 'ast_primary_plane_helper_atomic_update'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c:361:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc
Fixes coccicheck warnings:
drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1294:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1311:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1376:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c:280:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be
used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/nvmem/jz4780-efuse.c:214:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/nvmem/jz4780-efuse.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/jz4780-efuse.c b/drivers
Fixes coccicheck warning:
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c:1177:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c:1488:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be
used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h:45:53-54: WARNING: return of 0/1
in function 'is_early_uv_system' with return type bool
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:68:5: warning:
symbol 'mtk_m32' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Fixes coccicheck error:
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:815:7-32: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with
no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
This silences the following coccinelle warning:
"WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ne
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c:1017:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be
used
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet
/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c:954:33-34: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c:962:28-29: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc
Hi Shuah,
I run with the below command, and get the output report.
[local-host linux-next]# make coccicheck MODE=report
M=tools/power/cpupower/utils
Please check for false positives in the output before submitting a patch.
When using "patch" mode, carefully review the patch before submitting
On 2020/4/30 2:43, David Miller wrote:
From: Zou Wei
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:17:40 +0800
fix coccinelle warning, use ARRAY_SIZE
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sriov.c:713:43-44: WARNING: Use
ARRAY_SIZE
--
Please don't put this "---" here.
diff --git
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your comments, I will modify and send the v2
On 2020/4/29 11:23, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 11:15 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
fix coccinelle warning, use ARRAY_SIZE
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sriov.c:713:43-44: WARNING: Use
ARRAY_SIZE
Reported-by:
95 matches
Mail list logo
