On Monday 14 January 2013 05:50:12 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 14:45 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 14:42 +0100, Schrober wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > it seems the current version of checkpatch.pl in linux-next is
But of course,
here is a simple example:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f lib/decompress_bunzip2.c
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel
uninitialized value $ms_size in pattern match (m//) at
./scripts/checkpatch.pl line 3386.
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
. This works well on hlist, list and other "abstract"
data types. But the hash table would just jump to the next bucket and
continue.
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kerne
mptr not unnecessary? Why not following version?
#define container_of(ptr, type, member) \
((type *)((char *)(ptr) - offsetof(type, member)))
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
}
>
> Looks reasonable enough.
>
> Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft
Works well for me, thanks
Just as note: I think this test was accidently added twice. Once in commit
b13edf7ff2dd0fef95e981170fa71fa6b60421b0 and one time in
7d64ef43914a734990e48a80bc60686c8db21946 (just checked linux-next, and St
se macros and break the kernel doing that.
--
Franz Schrober
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
7 matches
Mail list logo
