Note: CC me
I just read on lwn about the implementation of `%[` in sscanf. Just
wanted to point out my implementation (which supports `]` ranges (`-`)
and negation (`^`)) and let you know that you are free to take
code/inspiration from it:
Note: CC me
I just read on lwn about the implementation of `%[` in sscanf. Just
wanted to point out my implementation (which supports `]` ranges (`-`)
and negation (`^`)) and let you know that you are free to take
code/inspiration from it:
, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> 2013-11-11 19:44 keltezéssel, Matthias Schniedermeyer írta:
>> On 11.11.2013 14:05, Shahbaz Youssefi wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer
>>> wrote:
>>>> I don't see a way around "borders" (Paper
, Levente Kurusa le...@linux.com wrote:
2013-11-11 19:44 keltezéssel, Matthias Schniedermeyer írta:
On 11.11.2013 14:05, Shahbaz Youssefi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer m...@citd.de
wrote:
I don't see a way around borders (Papers please), otherwise you can't
reject
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> I don't see a way around "borders" (Papers please), otherwise you can't
> reject things you don't want, you have to check if that something that
> is to be done is allowed. For e.g. you would get around every
> permission-check,
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer m...@citd.de wrote:
I don't see a way around borders (Papers please), otherwise you can't
reject things you don't want, you have to check if that something that
is to be done is allowed. For e.g. you would get around every
ger
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Shahbaz Youssefi wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> First, please CC replies to myself. Second, this is an RFC.
>>
>> I've been tampering with an idea for some time now and I've done some
>> research. Finally, I wrote i
Dear all,
First, please CC replies to myself. Second, this is an RFC.
I've been tampering with an idea for some time now and I've done some
research. Finally, I wrote it down here (a terrible place as it turned
out):
Dear all,
First, please CC replies to myself. Second, this is an RFC.
I've been tampering with an idea for some time now and I've done some
research. Finally, I wrote it down here (a terrible place as it turned
out):
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Shahbaz Youssefi shab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
First, please CC replies to myself. Second, this is an RFC.
I've been tampering with an idea for some time now and I've done some
research. Finally, I wrote it down here (a terrible place
10 matches
Mail list logo
