Hi lkml,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Simon Huggins wrote:
> post-rm rmmod parport-serial
post-remove rmmod parport-serial
even.
Simon.
--
* "Oops, yes, we now return you to your regularly scheduled kgcc*
| wars." -- Ma
Hi lkml,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:23:03AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > If the initialization of parport_serial fails, we obviously get an
> > error message, which is really annoying:
> [This is different to the issue that is fixed in the -ac tree about
> parport_serial getting probed for even
Hi lkml,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:23:03AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
If the initialization of parport_serial fails, we obviously get an
error message, which is really annoying:
[This is different to the issue that is fixed in the -ac tree about
parport_serial getting probed for even when
Hi lkml,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Simon Huggins wrote:
post-rm rmmod parport-serial
post-remove rmmod parport-serial
even.
Simon.
--
* Oops, yes, we now return you to your regularly scheduled kgcc*
| wars. -- Malcolm Beattie
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:23:07PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Roger> It does if you are running on a laptop. Then you do not want
> > Roger> the pages go out all the time. Disk has gone too sleep, needs
> > Roger> to start to write a few pages, stays idle for a while, goes to
> > Roger>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:23:07PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
Roger It does if you are running on a laptop. Then you do not want
Roger the pages go out all the time. Disk has gone too sleep, needs
Roger to start to write a few pages, stays idle for a while, goes to
Roger sleep, a few more
error
> ...
> Je rappelle que ce problème n'est jamais arrivé sur aucuns des kernels 2.2.X
> que j'ai compilé.
And he reiterates that 2.2.x didn't do this.
> N.B. : je possède un ATAPI CDROM: LTN242F
And gives his CDROM model number.
--
Simon Huggins \ "No problem is too big i
des kernels 2.2.X
que j'ai compilé.
And he reiterates that 2.2.x didn't do this.
N.B. : je possède un ATAPI CDROM: LTN242F
And gives his CDROM model number.
--
Simon Huggins \ No problem is too big it can't be run away from --
\ Linus
http://www.earth.li/~huggie
Hiya Andrey,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:17:31PM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:10:11PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > We have a server running 2.2.18 + RAID which has an eepro100 in it.
> > It's connected to a Dlink DFE 816 100 16port 100baseT
Hiya Andrey,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:17:31PM +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:10:11PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
We have a server running 2.2.18 + RAID which has an eepro100 in it.
It's connected to a Dlink DFE 816 100 16port 100baseTX hub.
When the machine
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> --- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
> +++ kernel-docSat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
> @@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
> ##
> # takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
> -# stored in the global
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
--- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
+++ kernel-docSat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
@@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
##
# takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
-# stored in the global
Hi Linux,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:56:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Peter Horton wrote:
> > If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported
> > by the driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald
> > Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/network.
> 2.4.x-test has
Hi Linux,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:56:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Peter Horton wrote:
If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported
by the driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald
Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/network.
2.4.x-test has some
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:29:14PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - test7:
> - Kai Germaschewski: ymfpci cleanups and resource leak fixes
> - pre5:
> - Jaroslav Kysela: ymfpci driver
Just tried this out on my laptop and it played and didn't give strange
messages that Pete's driver
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:29:14PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
- test7:
- Kai Germaschewski: ymfpci cleanups and resource leak fixes
- pre5:
- Jaroslav Kysela: ymfpci driver
Just tried this out on my laptop and it played and didn't give strange
messages that Pete's driver did
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:37:56PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> /pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.17/README
> /pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.17/ide.2.2.17.all.20001118.patch.bz2
> There you go Sean, hope that helps.
It didn't help me :)
Axialys have a squid/socks/NFS server
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:37:56PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.17/README
/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.17/ide.2.2.17.all.20001118.patch.bz2
There you go Sean, hope that helps.
It didn't help me :)
Axialys have a squid/socks/NFS server which
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:40:39PM -0800, David Hinds wrote:
> [..] I would need to know what kernel versions and what PCMCIA driver
> versions were involved. [..]
Is there actually a way to work out what version of userspace utilities
you are using?
I read Changes and it tells me that I need
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:40:39PM -0800, David Hinds wrote:
[..] I would need to know what kernel versions and what PCMCIA driver
versions were involved. [..]
Is there actually a way to work out what version of userspace utilities
you are using?
I read Changes and it tells me that I need
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> > > This is similar to my patch-names patch, which lets you add components
> > > to uname too. IIRC, it was rejected because it made things easier.
> > Erm? Not really. Not unless you want
> >
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 11:59:41AM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> This is similar to my patch-names patch, which lets you add components
> to uname too. IIRC, it was rejected because it made things easier.
Erm? Not really. Not unless you want
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 05:18:51PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Simon Huggins wrote:
[about modutils and complaints that people don't read
Documentation/Changes]
> > Why not make it easy on people and have a log something like:
> > 2.4.0-testX-preY
> > Requires mod
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
This is similar to my patch-names patch, which lets you add components
to uname too. IIRC, it was rejected because it made things easier.
Erm? Not really. Not unless you want
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:46:56AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
... and a few more times recent weeks ...
>
> Why don't you look in linux/Documentation/Changes? That file exist
> precisely to stop repeated questions like this on the linux kernel
> developers list.
>
Because the file just lists
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:46:56AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
... and a few more times recent weeks ...
rant
Why don't you look in linux/Documentation/Changes? That file exist
precisely to stop repeated questions like this on the linux kernel
developers list.
/rant
Because the file just
26 matches
Mail list logo
