inned
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
Changes in v2:
- fix for a test compilation error: "conflicting types for 'bpf_fentry_test1'"
Changes in v3:
- Addressed review feedback
- Added tests for map iterator, map and map-of-maps creation, deletion
- Cleaned up excessive outp
modification via security_bpf_map.
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
Changes in v2:
- fix for a test compilation error: "conflicting types for 'bpf_fentry_test1'"
Changes in v3:
- Addressed review feedback
- Converted the check for flags to an assert in map_parse_fds
- Modifi
fixes errors when reading from maps
> > that are protected from modification via security_bpf_map.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
>
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> I think the topic of map access in bpftool has been discussed in the
> path, but I can't remem
> > + make -C tools/bpf/bpftool -s -j"$ncpus" OUTPUT="$output_dir"/ >/dev/null
> > + echo ... finished building bpftool
> > + cd "$pwd"
> > +}
>
>
> Given that you're reusing the BPF selftests infra, you shouldn't have to
> rebuild bpftool as part of the test. It's already built from the
> Ma
fixes errors when reading from maps
> > that are protected from modification via security_bpf_map.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
>
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> I think the topic of map access in bpftool has been discussed in the
> path, but I can'
modification via security_bpf_map.
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
Changes in v2:
- fix for a test compilation error: "conflicting types for 'bpf_fentry_test1'"
---
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 3 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c| 57 ++
inned
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
Changes in v2:
- fix for a test compilation error: "conflicting types for 'bpf_fentry_test1'"
---
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/security_bpf_map.c| 56 +
.../testing/selftest
inned
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/security_bpf_map.c| 56 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_map.sh | 208 ++
3 files changed, 265 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/self
modification via security_bpf_map.
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 3 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c| 57 ++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/iter.c | 2 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c | 2 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
This reply was resent as the previous email had a missing In-Reply-To
in the header.
> > > On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 16:06 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > Tracking associated maps for a program is not necessary. As long as
> > > > the last BPF program using the BPF map is unloaded, the kernel wi
> > > On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 16:06 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > Tracking associated maps for a program is not necessary. As long as
> > > > the last BPF program using the BPF map is unloaded, the kernel will
> > > > automatically free not-anymore-referenced BPF map. Note that
> > > > bpf_ob
range.
This patch is the first in a series of two.
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c| 50 ---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h| 16 ++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests
.
This patch addresses that inefficiency.
Signed-off-by: Slava Imameev
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c| 144 +++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h| 5 +-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests
13 matches
Mail list logo
