Hi,
Am 10.12.2014 22:41, schrieb Julian Anastasov:>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> I rebuild everything with the two provided patches and still get:
>>
>> [ 512.475449] BUG: unable to handl
Hi,
Am 10.12.2014 22:41, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
Hello,
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
I rebuild everything with the two provided patches and still get:
[ 512.475449] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0014
Hi Julian,
Am 08.12.2014 21:40, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> Am 07.12.2014 19:27, schrieb Julian Anastasov:>
>>>
>>> I'm attaching a patch that avoids
Hi Julian,
Am 08.12.2014 21:40, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
Hello,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Am 07.12.2014 19:27, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
I'm attaching a patch that avoids rerouting in
IPVS for LOCAL_IN. Please test it in your
Hi Julian,
Am 07.12.2014 19:27, schrieb Julian Anastasov:>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> thank you for the fast responses! I would like to test any patch for 3.12.
>
> I'm attaching a patch that
Hi Julian,
Am 07.12.2014 19:27, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
thank you for the fast responses! I would like to test any patch for 3.12.
I'm attaching a patch that avoids rerouting in
IPVS for LOCAL_IN
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 22:32, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> thank you for the fast responses! I would like to test any patch for 3.12.
>
> I hope I'll have time this weeke
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 22:32, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
thank you for the fast responses! I would like to test any patch for 3.12.
I hope I'll have time this weekend...
If i understand correctly, i
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 10:55, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
>
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> i tried with 3.12.33 without any XFRM and now got this one (which is
>> reproducable):
>>
>> [ 233.956012] BUG: unable to handl
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 10:55, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
i tried with 3.12.33 without any XFRM and now got this one (which is
reproducable):
[ 233.956012] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 00:15, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>
>>> [16623.096721] Call Trace:
>>> [16623.096744]
>>> [16623.096749] [] ? xfrm_sk_policy_lookup+0x44/0x9b
>>> [16623.096802] [] ? xfrm_lookup+0x91/0x446
>>> [16623.096832]
Hi Jiri,
Am 04.12.2014 10:44, schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> On 12/03/2014, 03:55 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> [16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
>> 010600d0
[...]
>> [16623.096721] Call Trace:
[...]
>> T
Hi,
Am 04.12.2014 08:56, schrieb Steffen Klassert:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
> Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>>
>>
>> [16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
>
Hi,
Am 04.12.2014 08:56, schrieb Steffen Klassert:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi list,
[16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
010600d0
[16623.095445] IP: [81547767
Hi Jiri,
Am 04.12.2014 10:44, schrieb Jiri Slaby:
On 12/03/2014, 03:55 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
[16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
010600d0
[...]
[16623.096721] Call Trace:
[...]
This happens again and again with 3.12.33
Hi,
Am 05.12.2014 00:15, schrieb Julian Anastasov:
Hello,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Steffen Klassert wrote:
[16623.096721] Call Trace:
[16623.096744] IRQ
[16623.096749] [81547a7c] ? xfrm_sk_policy_lookup+0x44/0x9b
[16623.096802] [81547ef7] ? xfrm_lookup+0x91/0x446
Hi list,
[16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 010600d0
[16623.095445] IP: [] xfrm_selector_match+0x25/0x2f6
[16623.095480] PGD aeaea067 PUD 85d95067 PMD 0
[16623.095513] Oops: [#1] SMP
[16623.095543] Modules linked in: netconsole xt_nat xt_multiport veth
Hi list,
[16623.095403] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 010600d0
[16623.095445] IP: [81547767] xfrm_selector_match+0x25/0x2f6
[16623.095480] PGD aeaea067 PUD 85d95067 PMD 0
[16623.095513] Oops: [#1] SMP
[16623.095543] Modules linked in: netconsole xt_nat
Am 21.11.2014 21:12, schrieb Greg KH:
> I'm announcing the release of the 3.17.4 kernel.
>
> All users of the 3.17 kernel series must upgrade.
>
When using ocfs2 on 3.17.4 (i have seen this since 3.14) and
mount-bind ocfs2 to a lxc-container, when postfix inside the lxc tries to
write mails to
Am 21.11.2014 21:12, schrieb Greg KH:
I'm announcing the release of the 3.17.4 kernel.
All users of the 3.17 kernel series must upgrade.
When using ocfs2 on 3.17.4 (i have seen this since 3.14) and
mount-bind ocfs2 to a lxc-container, when postfix inside the lxc tries to
write mails to
Hi Matthew,
Am 18.06.2013 19:23, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
> Because all of my submissions are damaged and I haven't had the time
> to correct them or my badly configured email clients. Trust me this
> affects me in the exact same way it does you; I'll try to redo the
> patches and send them
Hi Matthew,
Am 18.06.2013 19:23, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
Because all of my submissions are damaged and I haven't had the time
to correct them or my badly configured email clients. Trust me this
affects me in the exact same way it does you; I'll try to redo the
patches and send them
Am 13.06.2013 03:15, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 19:17 -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
>> This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this time
>> around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of the
>> web interface.
> [...]
>
> This was
Am 13.06.2013 03:15, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 19:17 -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this time
around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of the
web interface.
[...]
This was
Am 23.05.2013 14:46, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
> On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej
> My most sincere apologies - one more time, from a different mail server
> that
Am 23.05.2013 14:46, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej
My most sincere apologies - one more time, from a different mail server
that hopefully won't go
Am 23.05.2013 14:35, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
> On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> Hm, i tried to apply it to 3.4.46 but it does not work:
>>
>> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# patch -p1 <../bridge-patch-3.4.46
>> pat
unsigned long *)addr1) ^
> + (*(unsigned long *)addr2));
> +
> + if (sizeof(fold) == 8)
> + return zap_last_2bytes(fold) == 0;
> +
> +fold |= zap_last_2bytes((*(unsigned long *)(addr1 + 4)) ^
> +
;
+#else
+return ether_addr_equal(addr1, addr2);
+#endif
+}
+
+
#endif/* _LINUX_ETHERDEVICE_H */
On 05/22/2013 05:26 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH:
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux
Am 23.05.2013 14:35, schrieb Matthew O'Connor:
On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Hm, i tried to apply it to 3.4.46 but it does not work:
node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# patch -p1 ../bridge-patch-3.4.46
patching file drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
Am 22.05.2013 23:54, schrieb Jay Vosburgh:
> Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>
>> Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH:
>>
>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/
>
> Ok, that's what we need.
>
> Now, please cc: the developers / maintainers of that patch and ask them
> to have
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH:> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200,
Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications Gm
Hi,
Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
> Wiessner wrote:
>> Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
>&g
Hi,
Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
> Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
>>
>> I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, bu
Hi,
why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_ included?
WHY IS THAT?
== 3.4 Series ==
diff -uprN linux-3.4.28/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
linux-3.4.28-patched/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
---
Hi,
why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_ included?
WHY IS THAT?
== 3.4 Series ==
diff -uprN linux-3.4.28/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
linux-3.4.28-patched/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
---
Hi,
Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi,
why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_
included?
WHY
Hi,
Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi,
why is this patch
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200,
Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Hi,
Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 15
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH:
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/
Ok, that's what we need.
Now, please cc: the developers / maintainers of that patch and ask them
to have it
Am 22.05.2013 23:54, schrieb Jay Vosburgh:
Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH:
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/
Ok, that's what we need.
Now
Am 25.02.2013 21:33, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Hi!
>
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [ 28.940032] general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [ 28.984953] Call Trace:
> [ 28.986628 [] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0
> [ocfs2]
> [ 28.988302]
Am 25.02.2013 21:33, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
Hi!
Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
[ 28.940032] general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
...
[ 28.984953] Call Trace:
[ 28.986628 [a04cb200] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0
[ocfs2]
[
Hi All,
Today i found a problem in linux 3.7.6 with ocfs2 when using ocfs2 from inside a
chroot or linux-vserver guest. This problem also exists at least in 3.6.11.
how to reproduce:
node:~# cat /etc/debian_version
6.0.6
node:~# rbd showmapped
id pool image snap device
1 rbd ocfs2 -
Hi All,
Today i found a problem in linux 3.7.6 with ocfs2 when using ocfs2 from inside a
chroot or linux-vserver guest. This problem also exists at least in 3.6.11.
how to reproduce:
node:~# cat /etc/debian_version
6.0.6
node:~# rbd showmapped
id pool image snap device
1 rbd ocfs2 -
46 matches
Mail list logo
