: On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:42:56 -0300 (BRST), Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, John Stoffel wrote:
>
>> Or that we're doing big sequential reads of file(s) which are
>> larger than memory, in which case expanding the cache size buys
>> us nothing, and can actually hurt us alot.
>
>That's
: On Thu, 10 May 2001 02:19:41 -0700, sachin kitnawat wrote:
> I am porting an Threading Application from Hp-UX 11.0
>to Red Hat Linux 6.2. There is a system call pthread_condattr_setpshared
>and pthread_mutex_setpshared in HP-UX which is not available on Linux.
Newer glibc versions (2.2
: On Wed, 9 May 2001 11:09:14 +0200 (CEST), Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
>On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a
>> > customer who's system fails due to this.
>>
>> You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc)
>
>Since there is no
Hi,
in
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2000week51/0423.html
Mark Kettenis writes
However, the "zombie problem" is caused by the way ptrace() interacts
with clone()/exit()/wait(), which I consider to be a kernel bug.
What apparently happens is that even though a thread ha
: On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:50:53 +0100, Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
>: On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:34:46 + (GMT), Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>2.2.18 might help and also as an '8139too' driver rewrite which may work
>
>Advancing further to a 2.4-test12 kernel (with the late
: On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:50:53 +0100, Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
>The rather major problem that
>remains is performance.
In case someone is interested...
Windows 2000 SP1 now has the Realtek 8139 (Celeron 433, 192 MB, pure
SCSI); drivers as shipped with W2K. Using a 40 MB test file over
: On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:34:46 + (GMT), Alan Cox wrote:
>2.2.18 might help and also as an '8139too' driver rewrite which may work
Advancing further to a 2.4-test12 kernel (with the latest available
8139too driver - 0.9.12) improves the situation even further, but doesn't
solve it.
I still
: On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:34:46 + (GMT), Alan Cox wrote:
>> Questions:
>> * Is the rtl8139 driver broken?
>
>Somewhat, especially in kernels that old
We do live on Internet time, I know, but has it gotten that fast that the
latest distributions ship with kernels "that old" ;-)
>2.2.18 might
[please CC replies; I am not on the list]
I have a 2.2.16 kernel on an HP Omnibook 800 CT with docking station. That
docking station contains an Allied Telesyn 2500TX NIC, identified by lspci
as "Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139 (rev 10)". Versions 1.07
(RedHat 7.0) and 1.08 (SuSE 7.0) e
Is there any support for the mobile IBM disk drive Advanced Battery Life
Extender power settings in Linux?
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/powerbooster
Power Booster allows any computer running Windows 95/98 and an IBM ATAPI 4
mobile disk drive to directly control advanced power managemen
10 matches
Mail list logo
