Re: "hw csum failure" error on skge driver with 4.3 kernel upon receiving ICMPv6 multicast listener discovery packets

2015-12-01 Thread Stefan Ring
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:44 PM, David Madore wrote: > The skge driver in the 4.3 kernel reports hardware checksum errors > upon receiving (certain?) IPv6 multicast packets containing ICMPv6 > multicast listener discovery messages. This is a regression since 4.1 > (I believe between 4.1 and 4.2).

Re: when is overriding idebus safe?

2001-01-25 Thread Stefan Ring
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: > When the manual for your mainboard states that clock settings for setting > up your CPU creates a change in the normal idebus=33MHz of any other > value, then you are probablely safe. Since all 32-bit PCI busses run at > 33MHz, as last thought and repo

kernel BUG at file.c:79! (using vfat)

2001-01-22 Thread Stefan Ring
kernel BUG at file.c:79! Invalid operand fat and vfat are compiled as modules Compiler used: stock rh6.2 (egcs-1.1.2) I get this error with 2.4.0 when I do dd if=/dev/zero of=//huge bs=1k on a vfat partition and the file size reaches the 4G mark. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble

2001-01-18 Thread Stefan Ring
> > I know that increasing the number of DIMMs on your board will require > > speedier RAMs on ASUS boards with some sort of an i440 chipset. This may > > well be the case for just about every other MB, it's only that I don't > > know specifically about these other boards. > > This means that a m

Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble

2001-01-18 Thread Stefan Ring
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Joel Franco Guzmán wrote: > With 128M the problem is not present, but with 192M it is. The only > difference is the memory quantity, or in other words, the additional slot > occupied by the new memory card. >- ASUS P299 (Chipset i440ZX). Note: the i440ZX don't support of

Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-17 Thread Stefan Ring
> Holy ancient and unsupported kernel + distribution batman. ;o) > > Have you tried 2.0.39 (said with a slight grin) ;o) Ahh, it was my fault. I forgot about binutils. Strange enough, 2.0.36 worked and 2.0.37 not. There is no change to the Changes file between these two versions, however. - T

Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-17 Thread Stefan Ring
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > Is there a reason you are using a relatively new machine like that with > such an outdated and arcane kernel (and distribution, for that > matter)? I'd suggest you upgrade to a more recent kernel and/or > distribution...it'll be a lot more stable (a

2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-16 Thread Stefan Ring
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..." message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and the latter just won't work. It also doesn't matter if I use zImage or bzImage. K