Hello all,
I try to do a setup with qemu and tap devices attached to bridges where 802.1Q
vlan packets that are tag stacked are running through the tap device/bridge
where the outer tag is stripped. But it seems on the way back out of
qemu/guest and back through the tap and bridge no additional
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:21 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Rene Schickbauer wrote:
> > To be frank, your argument, which boils down to "GPL is the only correct
> > open source license", makes me ashamed to have been advocating people
> > switching to
Hello all,
in former kernels with routing cache things were easy. We just used :
rt = ip_route_output_key(XXX)
src = rt->rt_src;
Now if there is no routing cache, we tried this:
rt = ip_route_output_key(XXX)
src = inet_select_addr(rt->dst.dev, dst,
Hello all,
in former kernels with routing cache things were easy. We just used :
rt = ip_route_output_key(XXX)
src = rt-rt_src;
Now if there is no routing cache, we tried this:
rt = ip_route_output_key(XXX)
src = inet_select_addr(rt-dst.dev, dst,
Hello all,
since SSDs are pretty widespread now the question seems valid. We have some
raid controllers, namely:
RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2208 [Thunderbolt]
(rev 05)
We would like to use SSDs for raid1/5/6 setups but found out that the drivers
don't seem to
Hello all,
since SSDs are pretty widespread now the question seems valid. We have some
raid controllers, namely:
RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2208 [Thunderbolt]
(rev 05)
We would like to use SSDs for raid1/5/6 setups but found out that the drivers
don't seem to
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > Does the above output mean that the cores are numbered right across the two
> > physical cpus? Does this mean one has to pin processes to 0,
Hello all,
I have a box with this kind of processor (0-31) and 128 GB RAM:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
stepping: 7
microcode : 0x70d
cpu MHz : 2486.000
Hello all,
I have a box with this kind of processor (0-31) and 128 GB RAM:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
stepping: 7
microcode : 0x70d
cpu MHz : 2486.000
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Does the above output mean that the cores are numbered right across the two
physical cpus? Does this mean one has to pin processes to 0,2,4,... to stay
Hello all,
is there a good reason why the ping command gets different answers from 3.[2-8]
and 3.9 kernels? Please have a look at this output from strace:
First 3.2.45:
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr("1.2.3.4")},
Hello all,
is there a good reason why the ping command gets different answers from 3.[2-8]
and 3.9 kernels? Please have a look at this output from strace:
First 3.2.45:
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr(1.2.3.4)},
Hello all,
I see some kind of bug with acpi_cpufreq on Intels Q6600 cpus. If you load the
module you see this in proc:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping:
Hello all,
I see some kind of bug with acpi_cpufreq on Intels Q6600 cpus. If you load the
module you see this in proc:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping:
Hello all,
during heavy testing I found out that kernel 3.9 virtio-net seems to have a
lot better performance than former kernel versions.
I am not quite sure if this is due to general enhancements in 3.9 or specific
to the virtio-net code.
In case someone thinks its really virtio-net, is there a
Hello all,
during heavy testing I found out that kernel 3.9 virtio-net seems to have a
lot better performance than former kernel versions.
I am not quite sure if this is due to general enhancements in 3.9 or specific
to the virtio-net code.
In case someone thinks its really virtio-net, is there a
Hello all,
if you look at the above file it contains:
#include
where should this file come from? There is no "asm" directory inside
linux-3.8.8/include/ ... ?
If you need additional info please cc me.
--
Regards,
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hello all,
if you look at the above file it contains:
#include asm/linkage.h
where should this file come from? There is no asm directory inside
linux-3.8.8/include/ ... ?
If you need additional info please cc me.
--
Regards,
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hello all,
I just tried to compile a complete kernel 3.8.8 including firmwares. First I
linked /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux. I think this is for
user-space compilations to use the right header files, correct?
Then I tried the kernel and this is what happened:
IHEX
Hello all,
I just tried to compile a complete kernel 3.8.8 including firmwares. First I
linked /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux. I think this is for
user-space compilations to use the right header files, correct?
Then I tried the kernel and this is what happened:
IHEX
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:55:04 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:38:30 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Rafael & linux-acpi]
>
> Thanks.
>
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> > wro
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:55:04 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:38:30 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Rafael linux-acpi]
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski
sk...@ithnet.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:59:53
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:59:53 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:55:25PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> can some kind soul please expla
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:55:25 +0200
richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > can some kind soul please explain how I can get my serial port back under
> > kernel 3.8.X. Earlier kernels s
Hello,
can some kind soul please explain how I can get my serial port back under
kernel 3.8.X. Earlier kernels showed:
Jan 10 13:57:18 mybox kernel: [0.712829] serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8
(irq = 4) is a 16550A
But 3.8.4:
Mar 26 10:39:14 admin kernel: [0.603647] serial 00:0a:
Hello,
can some kind soul please explain how I can get my serial port back under
kernel 3.8.X. Earlier kernels showed:
Jan 10 13:57:18 mybox kernel: [0.712829] serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8
(irq = 4) is a 16550A
But 3.8.4:
Mar 26 10:39:14 admin kernel: [0.603647] serial 00:0a:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:55:25 +0200
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
sk...@ithnet.com wrote:
Hello,
can some kind soul please explain how I can get my serial port back under
kernel 3.8.X. Earlier kernels
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:59:53 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:55:25PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
sk...@ithnet.com wrote:
Hello,
can some kind soul please explain how I can get my
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:04:07 +0100
Stephan von Krawczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> we recently tried to stress several netblk configurations and got this kernel
> log (amongst others). If additional information is required feel free to ask.
> We ca
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:04:07 +0100
Stephan von Krawczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
we recently tried to stress several netblk configurations and got this kernel
log (amongst others). If additional information is required feel free to ask.
We can try patches as well the config
Hello all,
we recently tried to stress several netblk configurations and got this kernel
log (amongst others). If additional information is required feel free to ask.
We can try patches as well the config is not in production yet.
Jan 12 15:46:54 fs2 kernel: swapper: page allocation failure.
Hello all,
we recently tried to stress several netblk configurations and got this kernel
log (amongst others). If additional information is required feel free to ask.
We can try patches as well the config is not in production yet.
Jan 12 15:46:54 fs2 kernel: swapper: page allocation failure.
Hello all,
can anyone give me a short hint how walking through the tasklist in a device
driver can be achieved nowadays. In ancient pre-20 times you could simply:
read_lock(_lock);
p=current;
do {
if (p->pid==pid) {
read_unlock(_lock);
/* found */
Hello all,
can anyone give me a short hint how walking through the tasklist in a device
driver can be achieved nowadays. In ancient pre-20 times you could simply:
read_lock(tasklist_lock);
p=current;
do {
if (p-pid==pid) {
read_unlock(tasklist_lock);
34 matches
Mail list logo
