Re: goodbye

2001-04-09 Thread Stephen E. Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Let's see, ORBS takes out the ISP route, DUL takes out the direct one. Is > >it any wonder people are hostile toward those two lists? > > Exactly. I hate spam, but I hate ORBS and DUL even more. If I'm going to get >

Re: uninteruptable sleep

2001-04-03 Thread Stephen E. Clark
That happened to me with 2.4.2-ac28 when I tried using DRM. I also got the following messages in syslog. /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo

MTRR on AMD THUNDERBIRD

2001-03-31 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Anyone know the status of mtrr the AMD Thunderbird? It does not seem to work for me anymore. cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=16711936MB: write-back, count=1 joker:/ # echo "base=0xd400 size=0x200 type=write-combining" >| /proc/mtrr joker:/ # cat /proc/mtrr reg00: bas

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

2001-03-23 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Alan Cox wrote: > > > You don't beleve me if I tell you: DOS extender and JVM (Java Virtual > > Machine) > > The JVM doesnt actually. The JVM will itself spontaenously explode in real > life when out of memory. Maybe the JVM on a DOS extender 8) > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: RTNL assert

2000-10-28 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Andrew Morton wrote: > > "Stephen E. Clark" wrote: > > > > When I configure in Tunneling I get the following error message. Is this > > normal? This with 2.4test9pre5 > > > > GRE over IPv4 tunneling driver > > RTNL: assertion failed at devine

RTNL assert

2000-10-27 Thread Stephen E. Clark
When I configure in Tunneling I get the following error message. Is this normal? This with 2.4test9pre5 GRE over IPv4 tunneling driver RTNL: assertion failed at devinet.c(775):inetdev_event - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAI

RTNL assert

2000-10-27 Thread Stephen E. Clark
When I configure in Tunneling I get the following error message. Is this normal? GRE over IPv4 tunneling driver RTNL: assertion failed at devinet.c(775):inetdev_event - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please rea

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-29 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Maybe this thread should be on the redhat list not the kernel list. Alec Smith wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:58:22 -0400 (EDT) > From: Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: David M. Rector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? > > Congratulations, you got further

Re: ip forwarding/tunneling for WIN PPTP broken in 2.2.18pre9?

2000-09-24 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Alan, Sorry for the noise I must be getting senile in my old age. I forgot I has patched 2.2.14 to support the vpn masquerading. Thanks for your indulgence and response. Steve Alan Cox wrote: > > > I had been using 2.2.14pre16 to forward Win PPTP from my winblows > > machine to our Corp Busine

ip forwarding/tunneling for WIN PPTP broken in 2.2.18pre9?

2000-09-24 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Juan, I had been using 2.2.14pre16 to forward Win PPTP from my winblows machine to our Corp Business network. I upgraded to 2.2.18pre9 and used make oldconfig using my .config file from my 2.2.14 directory. I can no longer log into our Corp network using my Linux system as ip-forwarder for my w

ip forwarding/tunneling for WIN PPTP broken in 2.2.18pre9?

2000-09-23 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Linux kernel, I had been using 2.2.14pre16 to forward Win PPTP from my winblows machine to our Corp Business network. I upgraded to 2.2.18pre9 and used make oldconfig using my .config file from my 2.2.14 directory. I can no longer log into our Corp network using my Linux system as ip-forwarder

attempt to access beyond end of device

2000-09-16 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Help. I am getting the above error when trying to build an Oracle Database. I have tried 2.2.14 and 2.2.18pre8 with the same results. I am putting the DB on /usr8 which from the df -m command should have plenty of room. Is this a kernel problem or a problem on my part? Below is part of my /var

Re: Availability of kdb

2000-09-09 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > > > > Tools are tools. They don't make better code. They make better code easier > > if used properly. > > I think you missed the point of my original reply completely. > > The _technical_ side of the tool in question is comp