I am trying to create a custom ELF and Windows PE loader for the purpose
of security research. I am having a difficult time finding how to
allocate memory for a binary at the desired address in memory
(especially if its non-relocatable). I would like to see why I cannot
get memory allocated at the
I am trying to create a custom ELF and Windows PE loader for the purpose
of security research. I am having a difficult time finding how to
allocate memory for a binary at the desired address in memory
(especially if its non-relocatable). I would like to see why I cannot
get memory allocated at the
The nvidia driver has been fine for me up to 2.4.2-ac20. I am going to
update to 2.4.4-ac8 today. In regards to the module the source code is
available from nvidia for inspection. The library that they want you to
use with it is binary only. The library should be source code as well but
the
The nvidia driver has been fine for me up to 2.4.2-ac20. I am going to
update to 2.4.4-ac8 today. In regards to the module the source code is
available from nvidia for inspection. The library that they want you to
use with it is binary only. The library should be source code as well but
the
I compiled 2.4.4-ac4 with gcc-2.95.3. No problems with previous versions
until today. Here is the output of the kenerl panic from ksymoops:
EIP: c0247cfa
Trace: c025602e
Trace: c02567a5
Trace: c0105058
Trace: c0105594
Code; c0247cfa
<_EIP>:
Code: c0247cfa
0: 8b 80 d4 00 00
I compiled 2.4.4-ac4 with gcc-2.95.3. No problems with previous versions
until today. Here is the output of the kenerl panic from ksymoops:
EIP: c0247cfa acpi_get_timer+e/2c
Trace: c025602e bm_initialize+56/278
Trace: c02567a5 bm_osl_init+79/8c
Trace: c0105058 init+58/1d0
Trace: c0105594 kernel
No.
I tried with everything in ACPI selected in the general setup config.
Broke. Tried it with only ACPI enabled and no options selected. Broke.
ac12 and on don't have it. I will try it against and report where it
broke.
Stephen
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Doh!
>
> OK, I'm
I noticed that the big update patch for ACPI was a part of 2.4.3-ac11 (Can
remember). Now its not a part of 2.4.3-ac12. Has it been removed? I have
turned on experimental settings when running make xconfig.
Stephen
---
Buyer's Guide for a Operating
I noticed that the big update patch for ACPI was a part of 2.4.3-ac11 (Can
remember). Now its not a part of 2.4.3-ac12. Has it been removed? I have
turned on experimental settings when running make xconfig.
Stephen
---
Buyer's Guide for a Operating
I have built this as a module due to the RedHat system I use (to be
consistent). I found that the xircom_cb driver works fine as a module
except for when using dhcp for dynamic ip address. If I set the ip address
of the network card to a static ip number it work fine. Yet if I choose to
use the
I have built this as a module due to the RedHat system I use (to be
consistent). I found that the xircom_cb driver works fine as a module
except for when using dhcp for dynamic ip address. If I set the ip address
of the network card to a static ip number it work fine. Yet if I choose to
use the
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> download the pmtools package from
> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm . (It's at the
> bottom.) The acpidmp utility is what you're interested in (you can ignore
> compile errors from the others.) Does this utility find
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, David Christensen wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> Is there a BIOS setup option for enabling ACPI? Make sure it is enabled.
The BIOS setup option for ACPI is enabled.
> Also attach a copy of the E820 output from dmesg.
Linux version 2.4.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, David Christensen wrote:
Stephen,
Is there a BIOS setup option for enabling ACPI? Make sure it is enabled.
The BIOS setup option for ACPI is enabled.
Also attach a copy of the E820 output from dmesg.
Linux version 2.4.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Grover, Andrew wrote:
download the pmtools package from
http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm . (It's at the
bottom.) The acpidmp utility is what you're interested in (you can ignore
compile errors from the others.) Does this utility find tables,
Motherboard is a P6DBE. IDE drives. Just found the site and confirmed it.
Stephen
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
> I am using kernel-2.4.2-ac12 (will try ac14). The motherboard is a
> Supermicro P6DBU. (I will need to check the board when I get home to
> confirm). I get the
I am using kernel-2.4.2-ac12 (will try ac14). The motherboard is a
Supermicro P6DBU. (I will need to check the board when I get home to
confirm). I get the messages below when the system starts:
acpi: system description tables not found
The manufacturer says that there is support for acpi. So I
I am using kernel-2.4.2-ac12 (will try ac14). The motherboard is a
Supermicro P6DBU. (I will need to check the board when I get home to
confirm). I get the messages below when the system starts:
acpi: system description tables not found
The manufacturer says that there is support for acpi. So I
Motherboard is a P6DBE. IDE drives. Just found the site and confirmed it.
Stephen
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
I am using kernel-2.4.2-ac12 (will try ac14). The motherboard is a
Supermicro P6DBU. (I will need to check the board when I get home to
confirm). I get the messages
using the following:
kernel-2.4.2 (linus release - no patches added)
kernel-2.2.17-4 (RedHat 7 release - no patches added)
kgcc-2.96.66
(kernel config - see compressed text file)
I have a Xircom Realport2 10/100 Card that uses the tulip_cb driver.
In kernel-2.2.17-4 (from RedHat with pcmcia
using the following:
kernel-2.4.2 (linus release - no patches added)
kernel-2.2.17-4 (RedHat 7 release - no patches added)
kgcc-2.96.66
(kernel config - see compressed text file)
I have a Xircom Realport2 10/100 Card that uses the tulip_cb driver.
In kernel-2.2.17-4 (from RedHat with pcmcia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> My setup looks like this, I boot from hde
> I configured my BIOS to boot from SCSI (I have no scsi-adapter but the
> promise card reports itself as one at boottime)
>
> boot = /dev/hde3
> delay = 50
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having difficulty booting from the Promise controller. Here is the
story:
I originally had my system setup with all drives working off the
mainsboard IDE controller (Intel 82371AB PIIX4). The setup was
/dev/hda - ST310232A, FwRev=3.09
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having difficulty booting from the Promise controller. Here is the
story:
I originally had my system setup with all drives working off the
mainsboard IDE controller (Intel 82371AB PIIX4). The setup was
/dev/hda - ST310232A, FwRev=3.09
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Martin Josefsson wrote:
My setup looks like this, I boot from hde
I configured my BIOS to boot from SCSI (I have no scsi-adapter but the
promise card reports itself as one at boottime)
boot = /dev/hde3
delay = 50
message
I am having a real interesting time with the Xircom card and
kernel-2.2.16. All transmission packets from the NIC are being flagged for
errors while all received packets are fine. The card is in a Twinhead
P88TE Cardbus PCMCIA slot. Eradicate errors like total packet loss, 1
packet out of 4
I am having a real interesting time with the Xircom card and
kernel-2.2.16. All transmission packets from the NIC are being flagged for
errors while all received packets are fine. The card is in a Twinhead
P88TE Cardbus PCMCIA slot. Eradicate errors like total packet loss, 1
packet out of 4
On the topic of APM, I have a supermicro P6DBE motherboard (SMP).
APM does not work because its not safe with SMP systems. What can I do to
get power management for this motherboard?
Stephen
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The BIOS listed is a new test BIOS that has a *corrected* APM
On the topic of APM, I have a supermicro P6DBE motherboard (SMP).
APM does not work because its not safe with SMP systems. What can I do to
get power management for this motherboard?
Stephen
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
The BIOS listed is a new test BIOS that has a *corrected* APM
It was suggested to me that the way to make hdparm settings permanent was
to create a script to change the settings on startup. Is this the best
choice?
Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Questions are only stupid if they are never asked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
It was suggested to me that the way to make hdparm settings permanent was
to create a script to change the settings on startup. Is this the best
choice?
Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Questions are only stupid if they are never asked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
I get the following message compiling 2.4.0-test6 or test8 on a RedHat 7
system. "/usr/src/linux/include/asm/apic.h:13:29: warning: nothing can be
posted after this token". Is this an issue with apic?
Stephen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 5 systems (98% Linux, 2% MS).
-
To unsubscribe from this
I get the following message compiling 2.4.0-test6 or test8 on a RedHat 7
system. "/usr/src/linux/include/asm/apic.h:13:29: warning: nothing can be
posted after this token". Is this an issue with apic?
Stephen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 5 systems (98% Linux, 2% MS).
-
To unsubscribe from this
33 matches
Mail list logo