Re: NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported

On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these.. > > [ 161.668635] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported > [ 161.668655] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390004 is not supported > [ 161.668670] NFS: SECINFO: secur

Re: [PATCH] fs/nfs/inode.c: adjust code alignment

Hello, On 05/08/13 10:59, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: >> From: Julia Lawall >> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall >> >> --- >> >> This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current >> semantics. I have no idea if it is the inte

Re: [PATCH] NFS: Stop sillyname renames and unmounts from racing

e NFS client code. steved. [Note: I did make the proposed corrections to my email client, so hopefully space-stuffing will be fixed. ] Author: Steve Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Added an active/deactive mechanism to the nfs_server structure allowing async operations to hol

[PATCH] NFS: Stop sillyname renames and unmounts from racing

be held. So for modules to be able to "see" that lock I needed to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() it. Any objections to exporting the inode_lock spin lock? If so, how should modules _safely_ access the s_inode list? steved. Author: Steve Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Oct 31 12:19:2

Re: rpc.mountd crashes when extensively using netgroups

Satyam Sharma wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Stefan Walter wrote: Steve Dickson wrote: Stefan Walter wrote: We do this on a much larger scale though. The bug we ran into is in line 96 in utils/mountd/auth.c. The strcpy can corrupt memory when it copies the string returned by

Re: rpc.mountd crashes when extensively using netgroups

n RHEL4. A first step would be to get a suitable fix in the current nfs-utils. Please open up bugs on all three of these issues and we'll see what can done... steved. commit 851ce1cb766cf295db85900aab804c0f82c12ab3 Author: Steve Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jul 31 09:57:19

[PATCH] NFS: procfs/sysctl interfaces for lockd do not work on x86_64

Here is an problem that was brought to my attention and I noticed it was not fixed in any of the upstream kernels I looked at. steved. A trivial patch that allows the setting of NLM timeouts and grace periods through the proc and sysclt interfaces on x86_64 architectures Signed-off-by: Steve

Re: kernel 2.6: NFS problem---cannot rmmod nfsd

Xin Zhao wrote: I compile kernel 2.6.11.10 and configure both nfs client and server as kernel modules. But after I reboot the machine and did "/etc/init.d/nfs start", the nfsd module is inserted. But when I tried to rmmod this module either with "/etc/init.d/nfs stop" or "umount /proc/fs/nfsd; r