Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On Monday 25 June 2001 11:13, you wrote:
>
> > 1937 claude shannon A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits,"
> >
> > 1948 claude shannon A mathematical theory of information.
> >
> > without those you're kind in trouble on the computing front...
>
> Yeah, I
Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 25 June 2001 11:13, you wrote:
1937 claude shannon A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits,
1948 claude shannon A mathematical theory of information.
without those you're kind in trouble on the computing front...
Yeah, I know I've bumped
Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:20:37AM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:09:56AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > Another one that I can't believe I forgot is from Rob Pike:
> > >
> > > "If you think you need threads then your processes are too fat"
>
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:20:37AM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:09:56AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
Another one that I can't believe I forgot is from Rob Pike:
If you think you need threads then your processes are too fat
Also, I
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> alterity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Haven't seen a post for sometime from the usually prolific Mr Cox.
> >What's the gossip?
>
> They needed some help from him to position Mir for it's
> final descent.
Strange. I thought his key skill was stopping things from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gaarden) wrote on 08.03.01 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can accuse MS of a lot of things. Being stupid and ignorant
> of the market is not one of them.
I'd have to disagree there.
In the mid 80's MS had never had a really successful applications
product, even though
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gaarden) wrote on 08.03.01 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can accuse MS of a lot of things. Being stupid and ignorant
of the market is not one of them.
I'd have to disagree there.
In the mid 80's MS had never had a really successful applications
product, even though Word,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mark Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm working on the Linux driver for the Tormenta public domain dual T1
> >card (see http://www.bsdtelephony.com.mx).
>
> Hmm.. Sounds like somebody has designed a truly crappy card.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on the Linux driver for the Tormenta public domain dual T1
card (see http://www.bsdtelephony.com.mx).
Hmm.. Sounds like somebody has designed a truly crappy card. Everything
is
James Sutherland wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
>
> > David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
> > >
> > > > For the end-user, the ability to see readings in other units would be
> > > > useful - how many people on this list work in
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Josh Myer wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I know this _really_ isn't the forum for this, but a friend of mine has
> > noticed major, persistent clock drift over time. After several weeks, the
> > clock is several minutes slow (always slow).
James Sutherland wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Russell King wrote:
>
> > Albert D. Cahalan writes:
> > > The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
> > > That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
> > > few others -- my memory fails me on this.
> >
> > iirc,
James Sutherland wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Russell King wrote:
Albert D. Cahalan writes:
The units seem to vary. I suggest using fundamental SI units.
That would be meters, kilograms, seconds, and maybe a very
few others -- my memory fails me on this.
iirc, SI comes from
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Josh Myer wrote:
Hello all,
I know this _really_ isn't the forum for this, but a friend of mine has
noticed major, persistent clock drift over time. After several weeks, the
clock is several minutes slow (always slow). Any thoughts on
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > if anyone finds a way of dimming the brightness make sure you post!
> > besides killing the battery, it also makes it hard to use in dark
> > places such as night flights. i feel as if i'm lighting up the
> > cabin in these cases.
>
> http://samba.org/picturebook
>
>
Alan Olsen wrote:
>
> This is probably a user-land and/or undocumented thing, but I am not
> certain where to get the correct info.
>
> Does anyone know how to get the screen brightness control to work on a
> Sony Vaio N505VE? There seems to be some sort of proprietary hook to get
> it to work
Alan Olsen wrote:
This is probably a user-land and/or undocumented thing, but I am not
certain where to get the correct info.
Does anyone know how to get the screen brightness control to work on a
Sony Vaio N505VE? There seems to be some sort of proprietary hook to get
it to work that
Alan Cox wrote:
if anyone finds a way of dimming the brightness make sure you post!
besides killing the battery, it also makes it hard to use in dark
places such as night flights. i feel as if i'm lighting up the
cabin in these cases.
http://samba.org/picturebook
should have it
Unfortunately the C standards people don't seem to realise there are
languages other than English. C99 had perfect timing to introduce UTF8
Unicode as acceptable in C source. Alas they missed the boat. I have
been embedding Chinese in C source for years (mostly Big-5 - UTF8 is
more likely to be
Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > So, every good programmer
> > > should know where to put comments. And it is unnecessary to
> > > put comments
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So, every good programmer
should know where to put comments. And it is unnecessary to
put comments to
explain what
Unfortunately the C standards people don't seem to realise there are
languages other than English. C99 had perfect timing to introduce UTF8
Unicode as acceptable in C source. Alas they missed the boat. I have
been embedding Chinese in C source for years (mostly Big-5 - UTF8 is
more likely to be
22 matches
Mail list logo
