RE: iwlwifi-driver card doesn't work with 3.19-rc2+

2014-12-31 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > I don't see this as another datapoint. All it means is that there are ancient > drivers that won't work at all with newer tools and that are taken into > consideration while trying to deprecate an API. Not just drivers, tools and applications too. I don't think we can

Re: ath: phy1: DMA failed to stop in 10 ms

2014-11-28 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Andrej Gelenberg wrote: > i got some problems with my Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 wlan pcie card. I > use my card as access point (with hotspotd) on amd64 machine. I use > self compiled vanilla kernel 3.17.4 and a get a lot of > "DMA failed to stop" messages in my kernel log. I found some reports on >

Re: ath9k ARM build error with v3.13-8330-g4ba9920

2014-01-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Josh Boyer wrote: > adds a udelay(1) call to the ath9k driver. This will cause a > build error on various ARM configs because the value passed to udelay > is too large: > > ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_hw.ko] undefined! > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 > make:

Re: pull request: wireless 2013-06-06

2013-06-12 Thread Sujith Manoharan
David Miller wrote: > John, I also don't like the ATK9K Kconfig option name change added in > this pull request, this is exactly the kind of thing that drives > Linus insane. > > Change the default, fine, but changing the name is unnecssary churn > and adds a new config prompt that people are goin

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree

2013-06-06 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/Kconfig between commit 8bb7f167a12a > ("ath9k: Use minstrel rate control by default") from the wireless tree > and commit cf657a2bc50d ("ath9k: Remove MAC_DEBUG") from the

Re: BUG: kernel panic on Dell Vostro 3560 when plugging in AC adapter

2013-01-10 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Adrian Byszuk wrote: > Aaaand failure again! > I haven't finished bisecting yet, but as of now I have ~20 commits left: > all related to 'mtd' - propably not a source of troubles too. > Any other way to diagnose this bug? I think this has been fixed by: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/to

Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Fix skb leaks

2013-01-09 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Larry Finger wrote: > > I'll come up with a patch and see if kmemleak still complains. > > Did I miss your posting on this issue? Nope, I haven't got to this yet, sorry. I'll try to send a patch by today. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bo

Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Fix skb leaks

2013-01-01 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Larry Finger wrote: > My only counter argument is that none of the other paths that get to > ath9k_htc_txcompletion_cb() leak the skb. It only happens for the path that > goes > through htc_connect_service(). Sure, but the TX completion handler would be invoked for every skb that is passed to

Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Fix skb leaks

2013-01-01 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Larry Finger wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c > index 4a9570d..a304748 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c > @@ -278,10 +278,12 @@ int htc_connect_service

linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the pci tree

2012-09-25 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi John, > > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c between commit 08bd108096b6 ("ath9k: > Use PCI Express Capability accessors") from the pci tree and commit > 046b6802c8d3 ("ath9k: Disable ASPM only fo