Hello,
I need add a device for a particular solution on a x86 box. Device is
Logitech QuickCam, USB based WebCam (has to be included because of the
change in the experiment specs).
To get the device working (capture images by a V4L application), need
to compile the driver (qc-usb) & insert the
Hello,
I am did compile those kernels to the best available hardware in a
P-III machine. (Research experiment - P-III box is a part of Wireless
stuff).
I have this enigma called Hardware Monitoring support on many boards. Because:
a) Vendors don't give enough info - which chips are meant for
On 4/26/07, Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't you need to increase CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT ?
Yep, I need to. But, have to enable the Kernel Debug (DEBUG_KERNEL) to
increase the value from default 14 value to 15/16. I feel that this
might increase the kernel size?
Ummm,
On 4/26/07, Alistair John Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't you need to increase CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT ?
Yep, I need to. But, have to enable the Kernel Debug (DEBUG_KERNEL) to
increase the value from default 14 value to 15/16. I feel that this
might increase the kernel size?
Ummm, is
Hello,
I am did compile those kernels to the best available hardware in a
P-III machine. (Research experiment - P-III box is a part of Wireless
stuff).
I have this enigma called Hardware Monitoring support on many boards. Because:
a) Vendors don't give enough info - which chips are meant for
Hello,
I need add a device for a particular solution on a x86 box. Device is
Logitech QuickCam, USB based WebCam (has to be included because of the
change in the experiment specs).
To get the device working (capture images by a V4L application), need
to compile the driver (qc-usb) insert the
Hello,
I did compile the kernel, boots good ;-) BTW, does anyone (on P-III)
facing a memory check skip or sort of? Not getting RAM info in the
dmesg. Unable to get dmseg from the start of the gcc check! Any clue?
Here is the dmesg I get on my box:
0] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01]
Hello,
I did compile the kernel, boots good ;-) BTW, does anyone (on P-III)
facing a memory check skip or sort of? Not getting RAM info in the
dmesg. Unable to get dmseg from the start of the gcc check! Any clue?
Here is the dmesg I get on my box:
0] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01]
On 4/25/07, Michael Tokarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.20.7]$ sudo make menuconfig
Don't compile kernel as root.
That was a mistake out of hurry, I never compile as root (sudo).
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o
> In file included from
Hello,
I was trying to compile those kernels with make menuconfig. I am
getting the error in scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o. Here is the
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.20.7]$ sudo make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o
In file included from
Hello,
I was trying to compile those kernels with make menuconfig. I am
getting the error in scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o. Here is the
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.20.7]$ sudo make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o
In file included from
On 4/25/07, Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.20.7]$ sudo make menuconfig
Don't compile kernel as root.
That was a mistake out of hurry, I never compile as root (sudo).
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.o
In file included from
On 4/22/07, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its "Present Resource Settings" --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
For
On 4/22/07, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its "Present Resource Settings" --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
For
On 4/22/07, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its "Present Resource Settings" --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
Yep,
On 4/22/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(added linux-acpi)
Are any other problems observeable due to this?
This issue I did observe with 2.6.20.7 & 2.6.21-rc7. Should I try anymore tests?
Anyway, here is the dmesg of 2.6.21-rc7:-
Linux version 2.6.21-rc7-Akula2 ([EMAIL
On 4/22/07, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Opcode 0xb0 is "WIN_SMART".
Error 0x04 is "command aborted/rejected/unsupported".
Something on your system is issuing S.M.A.R.T. commands from userspace
to the drive, and the drive either (1) doesn't support S.M.A.R.T.,
or (2) currently does not
On 4/22/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opcode 0xb0 is WIN_SMART.
Error 0x04 is command aborted/rejected/unsupported.
Something on your system is issuing S.M.A.R.T. commands from userspace
to the drive, and the drive either (1) doesn't support S.M.A.R.T.,
or (2) currently does not have
On 4/22/07, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its Present Resource Settings --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
Yep,
On 4/22/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(added linux-acpi)
Are any other problems observeable due to this?
This issue I did observe with 2.6.20.7 2.6.21-rc7. Should I try anymore tests?
Anyway, here is the dmesg of 2.6.21-rc7:-
Linux version 2.6.21-rc7-Akula2 ([EMAIL
On 4/22/07, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its Present Resource Settings --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
For
On 4/22/07, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an AML run-time error from a PCI Interrupt Link
trying to find its Present Resource Settings --
ie. the current IRQ for a programmable IRQ.
Please open up a bug report here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
For
Hello,
I did compile 2.6.21-rc7 for a P-III machine. Here is the ACPI part in
the dmesg:-
ACPI Error (psargs-0355): [PRSE] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
[\_SB_.LNKE._PRS] (Node dfd63f40), AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI Exception
Hello,
I am facing a strange problems with an old 1.2 GHz P-III machine with
a 10 GB disk (used as a dedicated web server, later retired out of
service!).
Out of interest to implement some wireless solution (experiment), I
did compile 2.6.20.7 for my requirement. Strangely, I did observe:-
Hello,
I am facing a strange problems with an old 1.2 GHz P-III machine with
a 10 GB disk (used as a dedicated web server, later retired out of
service!).
Out of interest to implement some wireless solution (experiment), I
did compile 2.6.20.7 for my requirement. Strangely, I did observe:-
Hello,
I did compile 2.6.21-rc7 for a P-III machine. Here is the ACPI part in
the dmesg:-
ACPI Error (psargs-0355): [PRSE] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
[\_SB_.LNKE._PRS] (Node dfd63f40), AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI Exception
On 2/7/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes, then it's almost always correct to "turn things on as needed to
make everything work out right", while turning things off would be
actively wrong.
I see a scenario (many others may have got this idea):-
Reading H/W config at the
On 2/7/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:07:50 +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:14:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 0
On 2/7/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:07:50 +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
On 2/5/07, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:14:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:24:28PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Wrong. I
On 2/7/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, then it's almost always correct to turn things on as needed to
make everything work out right, while turning things off would be
actively wrong.
I see a scenario (many others may have got this idea):-
Reading H/W config at the time
On 2/5/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:14:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:24:28PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Wrong. I abandoned all floppy drives some years ago. I'd actually
vote for removing the floppy driver from the kernel
> On 2/4/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Just let me know if you are interested in participating, and what types
> >of devices you wish to write drivers for (USB, PCI, network, etc.)
Yep, would love to dive into this oceanin available mode ;-)
> I would like to participate;
On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
This is about 2.6.20-rt2, no issues here.
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [5]
2 ?S 0:00 [migration/0]
3 ?S
On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
This is about 2.6.20-rt2, no issues here.
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [5]
2 ?S 0:00 [migration/0]
3 ?S
On 2/4/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just let me know if you are interested in participating, and what types
of devices you wish to write drivers for (USB, PCI, network, etc.)
Yep, would love to dive into this oceanin available mode ;-)
I would like to participate; however,
On 2/5/07, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:14:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:24:28PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Wrong. I abandoned all floppy drives some years ago. I'd actually
vote for removing the floppy driver from the kernel
On 2/5/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 16:06 +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
> > usual place:
>
> Clean
On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
usual place:
Clean boot for me with 2.6.20 & 2.6.20-rt1. There isn't any error
(like in 2.6.20-rc7-rt3).
But here is an interesting dmesg:
rcu_boost_dat: idx=1 b=0 ul=0
On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
usual place:
Clean boot for me with 2.6.20 2.6.20-rt1. There isn't any error
(like in 2.6.20-rc7-rt3).
But here is an interesting dmesg:
rcu_boost_dat: idx=1 b=0 ul=0
On 2/5/07, Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 16:06 +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the
usual place:
Clean boot for me with 2.6.20 2.6.20-rt1
On 1/31/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's in good enough shape that I'd probably have been happy to just
release it as 2.6.20, but since I want 2.6.20 to be a stability release, I
didn't want to risk any stupid bugs while the regressions got fixed, so
here's a final -rc7.
On 1/31/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's in good enough shape that I'd probably have been happy to just
release it as 2.6.20, but since I want 2.6.20 to be a stability release, I
didn't want to risk any stupid bugs while the regressions got fixed, so
here's a final -rc7.
It's
On 1/30/07, Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Have you pressed Ctrl+Alt+Backspace (by mistake)?
I don't think I have done that. I shall investige on this...
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Hello,
I was working on this test machine with 2.6.20-rc6. There was a
strange X log out (KDE 3.5.x). Three applications were running:
BitTorrent client, Firefox 1.5.8, and KWrite.
Suddenly, there was a log out from my work space (blank-blink for 3-4
seconds duration). Then, KDE log in screen
Hi Andrew,
I did compile the same, it's a trouble free boot. I did observe
interesting changes in the dmesg between 2.6.20-rc6 & 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
(wondering why there are so many changes in the output). Anyway, the
changes in brief:-
a) ACPI values
b) pnp - iomem range reserved values
c) Drive
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- If you hit a bug in -mm and it is not obvious which patch caused it, it is
most valuable if you can perform a bisection search to identify which patch
introduced the bug. Instructions for this process are at
I am hit with a compile
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- If you hit a bug in -mm and it is not obvious which patch caused it, it is
most valuable if you can perform a bisection search to identify which patch
introduced the bug. Instructions for this process are at
I am hit with a compile
Hi Andrew,
I did compile the same, it's a trouble free boot. I did observe
interesting changes in the dmesg between 2.6.20-rc6 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
(wondering why there are so many changes in the output). Anyway, the
changes in brief:-
a) ACPI values
b) pnp - iomem range reserved values
c) Drive
Hello,
I was working on this test machine with 2.6.20-rc6. There was a
strange X log out (KDE 3.5.x). Three applications were running:
BitTorrent client, Firefox 1.5.8, and KWrite.
Suddenly, there was a log out from my work space (blank-blink for 3-4
seconds duration). Then, KDE log in screen
On 1/30/07, Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you pressed Ctrl+Alt+Backspace (by mistake)?
I don't think I have done that. I shall investige on this...
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ingo,
I did boot with (almost) no problems. Here is ps ax info:-
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [5]
2 ?S 0:00 [migration/0]
3 ?S 0:00 [posix_cpu_timer]
4 ?S 0:00 [softirq-high/0]
5 ?S 0:00
Hi Ingo,
I did boot with (almost) no problems. Here is ps ax info:-
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [5]
2 ?S 0:00 [migration/0]
3 ?S 0:00 [posix_cpu_timer]
4 ?S 0:00 [softirq-high/0]
5 ?S 0:00
On 1/26/07, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did give you a response. Find a way to pay for 80+ kernel summit
invitees to travel to India (preferably in business class :-), and
we'll talk. That's not realistic? Well, then perhaps having the
concept of holding Kernel Summit in India
On 1/26/07, Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did give you a response. Find a way to pay for 80+ kernel summit
invitees to travel to India (preferably in business class :-), and
we'll talk. That's not realistic? Well, then perhaps having the
concept of holding Kernel Summit in India is
On 1/25/07, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was a cool booting, have really enjoyed this.
Here is the clean boot for me after spending for good time. Here is
the box info:-
Linux Typhoon 2.6.20-rc6-Akula-II #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 05:33:18 IST 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I shal
From: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:22:54 -0800
We've held netconf in Japan, Montreal, Portland, and this year will
likely be Europe. People found a way to make it and we found
sufficient sponsorship for all attendees who needed monetary travel
assistence every
On 1/25/07, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was a cool booting, have really enjoyed this.
I did find this in my dmesg. I have checked the dmesg of 2.6.19.x &
2.6.20-rc series. This is happening every time.
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
eth0: Transmit timed o
On 1/25/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:59:47 +0530 Sunil Naidu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got stunned when I opened www.lkml.org
>
> => lkml deals psp ipod laptop hotel flight travel holiday lcd
> tv mac pc
>
> All junk & non
Hello,
I got stunned when I opened www.lkml.org
=> lkml deals psp ipod laptop hotel flight travel holiday lcd
tv mac pc
All junk & nonsence .looks like a Domain seller!!!
What's the problem here?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On 1/25/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been more than a week since -rc5, but I blame everybody (including
me) being away for Linux.conf.au and then me waiting for a few days
afterwards to let everybody sync up.
So there it is, -rc6, hopefully the last -rc of the series.
On 1/25/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been more than a week since -rc5, but I blame everybody (including
me) being away for Linux.conf.au and then me waiting for a few days
afterwards to let everybody sync up.
So there it is, -rc6, hopefully the last -rc of the series.
It
Hello,
I got stunned when I opened www.lkml.org
= titlelkml deals psp ipod laptop hotel flight travel holiday lcd
tv mac pc/title
All junk nonsence .looks like a Domain seller!!!
What's the problem here?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On 1/25/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:59:47 +0530 Sunil Naidu wrote:
Hello,
I got stunned when I opened www.lkml.org
= titlelkml deals psp ipod laptop hotel flight travel holiday lcd
tv mac pc/title
All junk nonsence .looks like a Domain seller
On 1/25/07, Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a cool booting, have really enjoyed this.
I did find this in my dmesg. I have checked the dmesg of 2.6.19.x
2.6.20-rc series. This is happening every time.
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
eth0: Transmit timed out, status
From: Dirk Hohndel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:22:54 -0800
We've held netconf in Japan, Montreal, Portland, and this year will
likely be Europe. People found a way to make it and we found
sufficient sponsorship for all attendees who needed monetary travel
assistence every time.
On 1/25/07, Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a cool booting, have really enjoyed this.
Here is the clean boot for me after spending for good time. Here is
the box info:-
Linux Typhoon 2.6.20-rc6-Akula-II #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 05:33:18 IST 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I shall test
On 1/24/07, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Presumably the way to do this would be to have a large conference
(such as OLS) after the kernel summit. Hopefully most kernel summit
attendees would stick around for 2-3 days afterwards for the technical
conference.
This is a good idea ;-)
On 1/24/07, Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably the way to do this would be to have a large conference
(such as OLS) after the kernel summit. Hopefully most kernel summit
attendees would stick around for 2-3 days afterwards for the technical
conference.
This is a good idea ;-)
On 1/24/07, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any other reasons am missing here?
>
> Cost of flying 70 mainly US/European developers to India.
Thanks James. I thought about this factor. Thinking about what are the
factors which make a Kernel developer to show interest on a particular
On 1/22/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ditto..
Definitely disagree with that. I'd like to see the conference somewhere
else different this time - perhaps Czech Republic, or somewhere else more
easterly and Linux active (or even Finland...)
> While we're at it it would be nice to get
On 1/23/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This would be hard to organize and support. There are news sites like
LWN which give outlines of important kernel changes, and there are
mailinglists or community sites for architectures or driver subsystems
if you are interested in special
On 1/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G machine,
> that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues
Andreas
> has
On 1/23/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that 2.6.19 is out, most likely not. -stable releases are made
for the latest stable 2.6.x kernel, once 2.6.x+1 is out that's the one
-stable patches are made for (2.6.16 is an exception)..
Earlier I was going through the stable paches
On 1/23/07, Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be hard to organize and support. There are news sites like
LWN which give outlines of important kernel changes, and there are
mailinglists or community sites for architectures or driver subsystems
if you are interested in special
On 1/22/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto..
Definitely disagree with that. I'd like to see the conference somewhere
else different this time - perhaps Czech Republic, or somewhere else more
easterly and Linux active (or even Finland...)
While we're at it it would be nice to get rid
On 1/24/07, Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other reasons am missing here?
Cost of flying 70 mainly US/European developers to India.
Thanks James. I thought about this factor. Thinking about what are the
factors which make a Kernel developer to show interest on a particular
On 1/23/07, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.6.19 is out, most likely not. -stable releases are made
for the latest stable 2.6.x kernel, once 2.6.x+1 is out that's the one
-stable patches are made for (2.6.16 is an exception)..
Earlier I was going through the stable paches
On 1/23/07, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G machine,
that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues
Andreas
has
On 1/21/07, Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The overhead of timer interrupts at this low clockrate is significant
so I recommend to minimize the timer interrupt rate as far as possible.
This is really a tradeoff between latency and overhead and matters
much less on hardcores which run
On 1/21/07, Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The overhead of timer interrupts at this low clockrate is significant
so I recommend to minimize the timer interrupt rate as far as possible.
This is really a tradeoff between latency and overhead and matters
much less on hardcores which run at
On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. You have a faster Disk that writes about 45 MB/s. But I am not sure I
understand what you want to know?
I got these results with a customized 2.6.20-rc5.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel]$ uname -a
Linux Typhoon 2.6.20-rc5-Topol-M #1 SMP Sun
On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that these dd "benchmarks" are completely bogus, because the data
doesn't actually get written to disk in that time. For some enlightening
data, try
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time sync
The dd returns as soon
On 1/20/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
It is not expected to increase write performance, but it should help
you do something else during that time, or also give more responsiveness
to Ctrl-C. It is possible that you have fast and slow RAM, or that your
video card uses shared
Hello,
I did find this dmesg for the kernel 2.6.20-rc5
Linux version 2.6.20-rc5-Typhoon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1
20061011 (Red Hat 4.1.1-30)) #1 SMP Sat Jan 20 15:00:20 IST 2007
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
sanitize start
sanitize end
copy_e820_map() start:
Hello,
I did find this dmesg for the kernel 2.6.20-rc5
Linux version 2.6.20-rc5-Typhoon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1
20061011 (Red Hat 4.1.1-30)) #1 SMP Sat Jan 20 15:00:20 IST 2007
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
sanitize start
sanitize end
copy_e820_map() start:
On 1/20/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not expected to increase write performance, but it should help
you do something else during that time, or also give more responsiveness
to Ctrl-C. It is possible that you have fast and slow RAM, or that your
video card uses shared
On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that these dd benchmarks are completely bogus, because the data
doesn't actually get written to disk in that time. For some enlightening
data, try
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time sync
The dd returns as soon as
On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. You have a faster Disk that writes about 45 MB/s. But I am not sure I
understand what you want to know?
I got these results with a customized 2.6.20-rc5.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel]$ uname -a
Linux Typhoon 2.6.20-rc5-Topol-M #1 SMP Sun Jan
On 1/20/07, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Compiling with SMP as Generic (CONFIG_X86_PC is not set, CONFIG_M686=y)
>
>
>
> Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
>
>
> Using APIC driver default
>
>
>
> 2)
On 1/13/07, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:38:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
> lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what
> exact variant the Mac has.
On 1/19/07, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 05:34, you wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Matheus Izvekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just tried the firmwarekit, and here are the results, attached.
> > TYVM, thats a very useful tool.
>
> I do suspect ACPI issues on my
On 1/18/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the best place to start is:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
Ingo
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
patch?
If yes, any reason why we
Hello All,
Atlast I have succeeded in booting 2.6.19.2 on mutiple x86 machines. I
did observe a strange dmesg parameter behavior in this case:-
1) Compiling with SMP as Generic (CONFIG_X86_PC is not set, CONFIG_M686=y)
.
.
Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
Hello All,
Atlast I have succeeded in booting 2.6.19.2 on mutiple x86 machines. I
did observe a strange dmesg parameter behavior in this case:-
1) Compiling with SMP as Generic (CONFIG_X86_PC is not set, CONFIG_M686=y)
.
.
Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
On 1/18/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the best place to start is:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
Ingo
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
patch?
If yes, any reason why we need
On 1/19/07, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 05:34, you wrote:
On 1/17/07, Matheus Izvekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried the firmwarekit, and here are the results, attached.
TYVM, thats a very useful tool.
I do suspect ACPI issues on my new DG965WH
On 1/13/07, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:38:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what
exact variant the Mac has.
2.33GHz
On 1/20/07, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Compiling with SMP as Generic (CONFIG_X86_PC is not set, CONFIG_M686=y)
Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
Using APIC driver default
2) Compiling with SMP
Hi Ingo,
I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
measure the latency.
Is there any documentation or help which talks about patching, issues,
and latency benchmarks?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hi Ingo,
I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
measure the latency.
Is there any documentation or help which talks about patching, issues,
and latency benchmarks?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
