[PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: fix camelcase style warning

Remove CamelCase words. Warning found using checkpatch.pl Signed-off-by: Sushil Verma --- drivers/staging/rtl8192e/dot11d.c | 84 +++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/dot11d.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e

rdtsc to mili secs?

Hi, According to the Intel Arch. Instruction set reference the resolution of the "rdtsc" instruction is a clock cycle. How do I convert this to mili seconds? Thanks, Sushil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: kernel compiled with frame pointer

hich the process was executing at the time of the crash and not worried about the user land call trace before the process entered the kernel. Therefore, whether the user level program (which the process is executing) is compiled with or without -fomit-frame-pointer is irrelevent in this case. Regards,

Re: kernel compiled with frame pointer

it is used there to find out if the kernel is being compiled with frame pointer (inorder to get the correct offset of the return address). I think CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER should be used instead. Regards, Sushil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: kernel compiled with frame pointer

, Sushil. On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Russell King wrote: > Sushil writes: > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > code assuming frame pointer > > #else > > code assuming no frame pointer > You want #endif here. > > > Is CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER a part of some e

kernel compiled with frame pointer

, then is there a way to find the above in the standard kernels? What about CONFIG_KDB_FRAMEPTR? Is it correct to use this in a standard kernel to find whether the kernel is being compiled with frame pointer? Thanks and Regards, Sushil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs