On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> We always alloc critical/machine/debug check exceptions. This is
> different from the normal exception. So we should load these exception
> stack properly like we did for booke.
Tiejun,
I'm a little confused by these patches, because the actu
Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote:
> This would in any case change with the new LIODN allocation scheme. I
> intend on introducing the new scheme as a separate patch.
At the very least, you should detect when an LIODN is too large and print
an error message.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Free
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> When you add implementation specific attributes please add some
> indication to the names that it is only for PAMU. DOMAIN_ATTR_STASH
> sounds too generic.
We were thinking that maybe this attribute could be useful to other IOMMUs
in the future. Stashing is not a concept th
Varun Sethi wrote:
> Following is a brief description of the PAMU hardware:
> PAMU determines what action to take and whether to authorize the action on
> the basis of the memory address, a Logical IO Device Number (LIODN), and
> PAACT table (logically) indexed by LIODN and address. Hardware device
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
> can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but additional
> data is needed before a cape can be used. She could replace the FDT file
> used by U-Boot with
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Varun Sethi wrote:
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#incl
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The MSR[GS] bit indicates whether the kernel is running in processor guest
> state mode, but such a check is unnecessary. The driver already checks
> for the /hypervisor node and the fsl,hv-version property, so it already
> knows that it's runn
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> PS: I did build tested the series on ARM (OMAP), x86_32, x86_64 but not for
> ppc
> for sure.
For the record, patch #1 fixes the build break on PowerPC. Thanks.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from t
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
> for hcalls") from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
> to the user visible part of asm/kvm_para.h so asm/epapr_hcall.h became a
> user visible header fi
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
> --
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild |1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 511
> ++
What is incl
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> +int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip))
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
ret
Zhao Chenhui wrote:
>>> > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_PMC
>>> > >+extern int mpc85xx_pmc_set_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable);
>>> > >+extern void mpc85xx_pmc_set_lossless_ethernet(int enable);
>> >
>> >Don't use 'extern' for functions.
>> >
> Why? I think there is no difference.
It's unnecessary, an
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> +int mpc85xx_pmc_set_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct device_node *clk_np;
> + const u32 *prop;
> + u32 pmcdr_mask;
> +
> + if (!pmc_regs) {
> + pr_err("%s: PMC
13 matches
Mail list logo
