On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:50:15AM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:56:38PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > Hi Vincent (and all CCed), I'm sorry to ping about such "old" patch, but
> > we experienced a similar condition to what this patc
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:56:38PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Hi Vincent (and all CCed), I'm sorry to ping about such "old" patch, but
> we experienced a similar condition to what this patch addresses; it's an
> older kernel (4.15.x) but when suggesting the users to move to an
> updated 5
Hi Guilherme,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:56:38PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Hi Vincent (and all CCed), I'm sorry to ping about such "old" patch, but
> we experienced a similar condition to what this patch addresses; it's an
> older kernel (4.15.x) but when suggesting the users to move to
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:24:14AM +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Qian reported that some fuzzer issuing sched_setaffinity() ends up stuck on
> a wait_for_completion(). The problematic pattern seems to be:
> affine_move_task()
> // task_running() case
> stop_one_cpu();
>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:22:03AM +0800, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> According to the original code logic:
> cfs_rq->avg.util_avg
> sa->util_avg = * se->load.weight
> cfs_rq->avg.load_avg
> but for fair_sched_class in 64bits platform:
> se->load.weight =
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 05:27:44PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 17:12, Tao Zhou wrote:
> >
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:36:12PM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> > > sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
>
Hi John,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:05:52PM +0300, John Mathew wrote:
> Add documentation for
> -scheduler overview
> -scheduler state transtion
> -CFS overview
> -scheduler data structs
>
> Add rst for scheduler APIs and modify sched/core.c
> to add kernel-doc comments.
>
> Suggested-by: Lu
Hi Phil,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:36:12PM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
>
> The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning)
> did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch !=
> &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warni
The rotation operation is symmetric. So the comments about rotation
operation need to be corrected.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou
---
lib/rbtree.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rbtree.c b/lib/rbtree.c
index 1356454..750cfa8 100644
--- a/lib/rbtree.c
9 matches
Mail list logo
