Re: kqueue microbenchmark results

2000-10-27 Thread Terry Lambert
When considering this API, you have to consider more than just the programming models you think are "right", you have to consider all of the that are possible. All in all, this is an interesting discussion. 8-). Terry Lambert

Re: kqueue microbenchmark results

2000-10-26 Thread Terry Lambert
kind will hinder that adoption, and would certainly prevent adoption by mainstream UNIX: if you have to code it differently on different platforms, then you might as well code it differently on their platform, too. Terry Lambert

Re: kqueue microbenchmark results

2000-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
h priority channel ...what did you expect, when you called the wrong system call on a socket? > I see a trend here, let's try Linux: Linux also thought it was OK to modify the contents of the timeval structure before returning it. Terry Lambert

Re: kqueue microbenchmark results

2000-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
s, after you do that). Otherwise, it's just him against Linus, and making a decision based on one paper or an authors reputation is bad science (and bad engineering). Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not