Re: libata PATA status for VIA 8237

2007-10-24 Thread Thierry Vignaud
DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future > (currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks > and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was > full or not. For what I've googled, it seems

Re: libata PATA status for VIA 8237

2007-10-24 Thread Thierry Vignaud
DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future (currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was full or not. For what I've googled, it seems that

Re: [2.6.20] Regression in dmfe driver

2007-02-06 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Commit 7628b0a8c01a02966d2228bdf741ddedb128e8f8 (drivers/net/tulip/dmfe: > support basic carrier detection) breaks networking on my Davicom DM9009. > ethtool always reports there is no link. tcpdump shows incoming packets, > but TX is disabled.

Re: [2.6.20] Regression in dmfe driver

2007-02-06 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Commit 7628b0a8c01a02966d2228bdf741ddedb128e8f8 (drivers/net/tulip/dmfe: support basic carrier detection) breaks networking on my Davicom DM9009. ethtool always reports there is no link. tcpdump shows incoming packets, but TX is disabled. Reverting the

Re: megaraid driver (proposed patch)

2005-03-31 Thread Thierry Vignaud
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Would you consider to apply the following patch proposed by > > > > Thierry Vignaud as a solution for the MandrakeSoft kernel in > > > > the mainstream 2.6 kernel ? > > > > > > Well

Re: megaraid driver (proposed patch)

2005-03-31 Thread Thierry Vignaud
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would you consider to apply the following patch proposed by Thierry Vignaud as a solution for the MandrakeSoft kernel in the mainstream 2.6 kernel ? Well, to be considered you'd need to cc the megaraid maintainers and the linux-scsi

Re: Unknown PCI device?

2000-12-21 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone know what this is? > > 00:07.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3050 (rev 30) > Flags: medium devsel if its pci id is 0x11063050, then it's a VIA Power Management Controller. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Unknown PCI device?

2000-12-21 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Mike A. Harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyone know what this is? 00:07.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3050 (rev 30) Flags: medium devsel if its pci id is 0x11063050, then it's a VIA Power Management Controller. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_TOSHIBA Configure.help for 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-21 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that for 2.4.0-test11 there is no help > for CONFIG_TOSHIBA, although there is for 2.2.17. > > The following patch borrows the words for CONFIG_TOSHIBA > from the 2.2.17 Documentation/Configure.help, dropping > an extraneous "the" from the

Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_TOSHIBA Configure.help for 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-21 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noticed that for 2.4.0-test11 there is no help for CONFIG_TOSHIBA, although there is for 2.2.17. The following patch borrows the words for CONFIG_TOSHIBA from the 2.2.17 Documentation/Configure.help, dropping an extraneous "the" from the first line.