> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Starovoitov
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:32 AM wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alexei Starovoitov
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Alexei
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Starovoitov
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alexei Starovoitov
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:10 AM wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Starovoitov
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:52 AM Yang Li wrote:
> >
> > Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
> > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:189:7-11: WARNING
> > comparing pointer to 0, suggest !E
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Starovoitov
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:10 AM wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alexei Starovoitov
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:52 AM Yang Li
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fix the following coccicheck
> -Original Message-
> From: Shuah Khan on Monday, October 14, 2019 3:45 PM
>
> Fix O= and KBUILD_OUTPUT handling for relative paths.
>
> export KBUILD_OUTPUT=../kselftest_size
> make TARGETS=size kselftest-all
>
> or
>
> make O=../kselftest_size TARGETS=size kselftest-all
>
> In
> -Original Message-
> From: Masami Hiramatsu on Thursday, October 03, 2019 7:13 PM
>
> Use real temporary working directory for generating kselftest
> archive.
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest directory has been used for
> the temporary working directory for making a tar archive
I found a bug in kselftest KBUILD_OUTPUT handling.
The following works:
$ cd /home/tbird/work/linux
$ export KBUILD_OUTPUT=/home/tbird/work/kbuild
$ yes '' | make localmodconfig
$ make TARGETS=size kselftest
But this doesn't work:
$ cd /home/tbird/work/linux
$ export KBUILD_OUTPUT=../kbuild
$
> -Original Message-
> From: Ingo Molnar on Sunday, September 22, 2019 1:26 AM
>
> * Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:35 AM Brendan Higgins
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry about that. I am surprised that none of the other reviewers
> > > brought this up.
> >
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From tim.b...@sony.com
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kees Cook
> >
> > Commit a745f7af3cbd ("selftests/harness: Add 30 second timeout per
> > test") solves the problem of kselftest_harness.h-using binary tests
> > possibly hanging forever. However,
> -Original Message-
> From: shuah
>
> On 9/19/19 12:55 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 19/09/2019 11:06:44-0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Commit a745f7af3cbd ("selftests/harness: Add 30 second timeout per
> >> test") solves the problem of kselftest_harness.h-using binary tests
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kees Cook
>
> Commit a745f7af3cbd ("selftests/harness: Add 30 second timeout per
> test") solves the problem of kselftest_harness.h-using binary tests
> possibly hanging forever. However, scripts and other binaries can still
> hang forever. This adds a
Minor spelling nit..
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The vprintk_emit() function is not available when CONFIG_PRINTK
> is disabled:
>
> kunit/test.c:22:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vprintk_emit' [-
> Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> I suppose
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:22:43PM +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brendan Higgins
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:46 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 21:58
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Perches
>
> On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 21:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches
> []
> > IMHO %pV should be avoided if possible. Just because people are
> > doing it doesn't mean it should be used when it is not necessary.
>
> Well,
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:46 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 21:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > From: Joe Perches
> > []
> > > IMHO %pV should be avoided if possible. Just because people are
> > > doing it
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Perches
>
> On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 11:38 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:44:58PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 11:01 -0600, shuah wrote:
> > > > On 8/28/19 3:49 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:00 PM shuah wrote:
> >
> > On 8/27/19 3:36 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:09 PM Brendan Higgins
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:03 PM Brendan Higgins
> > >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anders Roxell
>
> When running tcp_fastopen_backup_key.sh the following issue was seen in
> a busybox environment.
> ./tcp_fastopen_backup_key.sh: line 33: [: -ne: unary operator expected
>
> Shellcheck showed the following issue.
> $ shellcheck
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Vyukov
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:03 PM Tim Bird wrote:
> >
> > I'm in the process now of planning Automated Testing Summit 2019,
> > which is tentatively planned for Lyon, France on October 31. This is
>
> This is _November_ 1, right?
No.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sasha Levin
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 02:02:53PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
...
> >
> >With regards to the Testing microconference at Plumbers, I would like
> >to do a presentation on the current status of test standards and test
> >framework
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Viro
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 06:52:44AM +, visionsofal...@redchan.it wrote:
> > Al: the FSF was so insistent on the adoption of the GPL version 3
> > because the GPL version 2 is not operative against the grantor.
>
> Anonymous wankstain: sod off
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Viro
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 06:52:44AM +, visionsofal...@redchan.it wrote:
> > Al: the FSF was so insistent on the adoption of the GPL version 3
> > because the GPL version 2 is not operative against the grantor.
>
> Anonymous wankstain: sod off
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox
>
> > +to the circumstances. The Code of Conduct Committee is obligated to
> > +maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
> > +Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted
> > +separately.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox
>
> > +to the circumstances. The Code of Conduct Committee is obligated to
> > +maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
> > +Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted
> > +separately.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> On 10/18/18 07:56, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:53 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 10/17/18 12:08, James Bottomley wrote:
> > [...]
> Trying to understand how you are understanding my comment vs what
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> On 10/18/18 07:56, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:53 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 10/17/18 12:08, James Bottomley wrote:
> > [...]
> Trying to understand how you are understanding my comment vs what
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM wrote:
> > >
> > > It might be of interest to the automated testing mailing list too ? (Tim?)
> >
> > I think this is interesting to groups doing automated testing of the kernel
> > (including myself)
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM wrote:
> > >
> > > It might be of interest to the automated testing mailing list too ? (Tim?)
> >
> > I think this is interesting to groups doing automated testing of the kernel
> > (including myself)
> -Original Message-
> From: Kieran Bingham
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> I very excitedly jumped on these patches to try them out, as this is
> essentially something I was trying to do a few weeks back.
>
> On 17/10/18 00:50, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Makes minimum number of changes outside
> -Original Message-
> From: Kieran Bingham
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> I very excitedly jumped on these patches to try them out, as this is
> essentially something I was trying to do a few weeks back.
>
> On 17/10/18 00:50, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Makes minimum number of changes outside
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
> framework for the Linux kernel.
I'm interested in this, and think the kernel might benefit from this,
but I have lots of questions.
> Unlike Autotest and kselftest,
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Higgins
>
> This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
> framework for the Linux kernel.
I'm interested in this, and think the kernel might benefit from this,
but I have lots of questions.
> Unlike Autotest and kselftest,
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 17:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 17:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From:
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Monday, 8 October 2018 17:12:05 EEST tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josh Triplett
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, 7 October
> -Original Message-
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Monday, 8 October 2018 17:12:05 EEST tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josh Triplett
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, 7 October
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Triplett
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Providing an
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Triplett
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:18:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Providing an
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
> On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> > > outlined in the enforcement clause
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
> On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> > > outlined in the enforcement clause
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
