I uses gcc "trunk" with -Wconversion,
because of they finaly implement warrning for such things:
uint16_t a;
uint8_t b;
b = a;
see
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/NewWconversion
On 2/7/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:39:45 +0300
"Tomasz Kvars
While compiling my code, I always get bunch of warrning from headers,
here is fix for them:
__getblk is alawys called with unsigned argument,
but it takes signed, the same story with __bread,__breadahead and so on.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kvarsin
unsigned-fix.patch
Description: Binary data
d binderman wrote:
Hello there,
I just tried to compile Linux kernel 2.6.19.2 with the
new GNU C compiler version 4.3 snapshot 20070126.
The compiler said
fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
The source code is
for (i = 0; i < (UFS_NDADDR + UFS_NINDIR); i
I've test 2.6.20-rc7,
still messages that ordinary catch syslog-ng, also go
to console, unlike 2.6.18(my default kernel) and 2.6.20-rc4(or rc3).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 28, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: 2.6.20-rc6 regress
On 1/30/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz, is this still happening in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3?
>
> err. We merged that patch. So perhaps 2.6.20-rc6 now crashes in the
> same manner?
no, we havent merged that patch yet, but it's:
x86_64-m
On 1/30/07, Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
> "Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $qu
When I booted last time with 2.6.20(as I remember -rc4),
I don't see this issue:
all kernel message instead of just
go to syslog-ng and then into /var/log/messages
also go to console.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
This I got during boot with 2.6.20-rc4:
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.20-rc4 #3
-
mount/5819 is trying to acquire lock:
(&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x21/0x30
but task
During boot into 2.6.20-rc4 iptables says
iptables-restore: line 15 failed.
And works fine with my default kernel: 2.6.18.x
Here is rules:
---
# cat /var/lib/iptables/rules-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Tue Jan 9 10:20:35 2007
*filter
:INPUT DROP [26037:8838791]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
If anybody interesting this changes by Vivek Goyal:
-int tsc_disable __cpuinitdata = 0;
+int tsc_disable = 0;
fix for me booting, and except message
IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 7(is it normal?) and after that dump
of stack, all works fine.
On 1/5/07, Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 1/5/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $qu
I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
$quilt top
patches/sched-improve-sched_clock-on-i686.patch
backtrace which I got by connecting "gdb" to machine:
_raw_spin_lock (lock=0xc06c0c60) at lib/spinlock_debug.c:108
108
Works for me. At least now I can not reproduce this bug.
On 12/20/06, Evgeniy Dushistov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:09:55AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:04:06 +0300
> "Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 12/20/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:04:06 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot to say I use linux-2.6.20-rc1-mm1
>
> On 12/20/06, Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have some p
Forgot to say I use linux-2.6.20-rc1-mm1
On 12/20/06, Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some problems with write support of UFS.
Here is script which demonstrate problem:
#create image
mkdir /tmp/ufs-expirements && cd /tmp/ufs-expirements/
for ((i=0; i<1024*
I have some problems with write support of UFS.
Here is script which demonstrate problem:
#create image
mkdir /tmp/ufs-expirements && cd /tmp/ufs-expirements/
for ((i=0; i<1024*1024*2; ++i)); do printf "z"; done > image
#build ufs tools
wget
'http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ufs-lin
17 matches
Mail list logo
