[PATCH] remove val in __do_proc_dointvec

2007-12-27 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
Hi What's the purpose of the val in __do_proc_dointvec ? It seems no one ever uses this val. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur linux-2.6.23.org/kernel/sysctl.c linux-2.6.23/kernel/sysctl.c --- linux-2.6.23.org/kernel/sysctl.c2007-12-28

[PATCH] remove val in __do_proc_dointvec

2007-12-27 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
Hi What's the purpose of the val in __do_proc_dointvec ? It seems no one ever uses this val. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -Nur linux-2.6.23.org/kernel/sysctl.c linux-2.6.23/kernel/sysctl.c --- linux-2.6.23.org/kernel/sysctl.c2007-12-28 09:29

[PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Emulex lpfc driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
this patch should also be acked. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c --- linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2007-07-09 08:32:17.000

[PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Emulex lpfc driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
this patch should also be acked. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c --- linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2007-07-09 08:32:17.0 +0900

Re: [PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-09 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
Dear Auke Sorry I sent the wrong patch. I resubmit the patch. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h linux-2.6.22/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h --- linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h 2007-07-09

[PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-09 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
acy I/O port free option is non-default. Rest of the part has not been changed since my previous patch. Any comments would be helpful. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h linux-2.6.22/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.

[PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-09 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
changed since my previous patch. Any comments would be helpful. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h linux-2.6.22/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h --- linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h 2007-07-09 08:32

Re: [PATCH][Take2] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-08-09 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
Dear Auke Sorry I sent the wrong patch. I resubmit the patch. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -Nurp linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h linux-2.6.22/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h --- linux-2.6.22.org/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h 2007-07-09 08:32

Re: [PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-24 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
d use for this function? You said 82540, 82541, 82544 are okay, and I'm gonna add those 3 IDs for 82545, and 6 IDs for 82546. Are there any other IDs that I'm missing? Thanks Tomohiro Kusumi drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c 303 /

Re: [PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-24 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
82540, 82541, 82544 are okay, and I'm gonna add those 3 IDs for 82545, and 6 IDs for 82546. Are there any other IDs that I'm missing? Thanks Tomohiro Kusumi drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c 303 /** 304 * Set the mac

Re: [PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
ch _chipsets_ support this > functionality. Thanks for pointing out the problem, but I can't quite understand what you are trying to say. What do you mean by the chipset? Are you talking about the chipset of the NIC? or the South bridge? I'd be glad if you can explain it to me. Tomohiro Kusumi Kok, Auke

[PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Emulex lpfc driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
uge number of PCI devices being used on the system and no I/O port region assigned to the device. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- lpfc_init.c | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -uprN linux-2.6.21.orig/d

[PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
evice even when there are huge number of PCI devices being used on the system and no I/O port region assigned to the device. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- e1000.h |6 +- e1000_main.c | 152 +++---

[PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
when there are huge number of PCI devices being used on the system and no I/O port region assigned to the device. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- e1000.h |6 +- e1000_main.c | 152 +++ 2 files

[PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Emulex lpfc driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
of PCI devices being used on the system and no I/O port region assigned to the device. Tomohiro Kusumi Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- lpfc_init.c | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -uprN linux-2.6.21.orig/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c

Re: [PATCH] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Making Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free

2007-05-10 Thread Tomohiro Kusumi
. Thanks for pointing out the problem, but I can't quite understand what you are trying to say. What do you mean by the chipset? Are you talking about the chipset of the NIC? or the South bridge? I'd be glad if you can explain it to me. Tomohiro Kusumi Kok, Auke wrote: Tomohiro Kusumi wrote: Hi