On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I'll take this series into clk-next.
>
Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to
go through?
Thanks,
Mike
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>> Kind regards
>> Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
No ping necessary. I think mails are getting dropped somewhere on
your end. I've already taken this into clk-next. See this thread on
MARC:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=134643752523847&w=2
And here is the patch on cl
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
>
> 2012/8/18 Belisko Marek
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Kelvin Cheung
>> wrote:
>> > This adds clock support to Loongson1B SoC using the common clock
>> > infrastructure.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Kelvin Cheung
>> > ---
>> > dri
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
> This patch adds common clock framework support for arch-vt8500.
> WM8650 support is included in preparation for devicetree support.
> Each SoC has a seperate initialization function due to no
> devicetree support to identify SoCs at the moment.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> '
>> This patch moves direct control of the MPU voltage regulator out of the
>> cpufreq driver .target callback and instead puts that logic into a clock
>> rate change notifier callbac
5 matches
Mail list logo
