Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-28 Thread Uwe Bugla
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 22:55 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > > > I additionally built my 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 kernel without High Resolution > > > Timer, but the high ping problem is still there. > > > > Hmm, that's mysterious. Wild guess is that highres exposes the hidden > > "feature" in a

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22

2007-05-28 Thread Uwe Bugla
On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote: > Can you also test the following patch? > I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard > shared IRQs, so it might possibly generate a NAPI storm, dunno. > Worth a try. > > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c >

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22

2007-05-28 Thread Uwe Bugla
On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote: Can you also test the following patch? I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard shared IRQs, so it might possibly generate a NAPI storm, dunno. Worth a try. Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-28 Thread Uwe Bugla
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 22:55 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: I additionally built my 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 kernel without High Resolution Timer, but the high ping problem is still there. Hmm, that's mysterious. Wild guess is that highres exposes the hidden feature in a different way than

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-27 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie: > On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: > > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-27 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie: On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: Uwe, please try the following patch

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie: > On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: > > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: > > > Uwe, please try the following patch: > > > > > > Index: b

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie: > Uwe Bugla wrote: > > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you, > > Andrew. > > > > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device! > > Could you please send the following: > &

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: > Uwe, please try the following patch: > > Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c > === > --- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/b44.c2007-05-18 > 18:09:50.0 +0200

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:19 schrieben Sie: > On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that: > > > > git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git > > > > It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:41 schrieben Sie: > On 5/26/07, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not > > > clear enough in the sense

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not > > clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and > > comprehensive. > >

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:40 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled > > > b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess). > > > > Yes! > > > >

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine > > > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P ) > > > > err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie: > On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible > > to debug the problem the way he is responding. > > Well, I'm not the first person in the

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie: > Andrew, > > I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible > to debug the problem the way he is responding. > Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding > him to the killfile, ... . > I ask to try wireless-dev, as the

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work > > with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e. > > my router) is called Jer

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie: > On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie: > > > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie: On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie: On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his machine. Now who

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e. my router) is called Jerry (as a reminiscence to Mr

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie: Andrew, I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible to debug the problem the way he is responding. Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding him to the killfile, ... . I ask to try wireless-dev, as the driver

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie: On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible to debug the problem the way he is responding. Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote: I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P ) err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start. Yes, I

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:40 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote: I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess). Yes! So there was no b44-PCI driver loaded. Well, not exactly

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote: Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and comprehensive. Why don't you simply submit a patch

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:41 schrieben Sie: On 5/26/07, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote: Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:19 schrieben Sie: On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that: git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works fine for me.

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: Uwe, please try the following patch: Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c === --- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/b44.c2007-05-18 18:09:50.0 +0200 +++

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie: Uwe Bugla wrote: OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you, Andrew. Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device! Could you please send the following: 1. the output of lsmod from the non-functioning kernel

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: Uwe, please try the following patch: Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-26 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie: On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie: On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie: Uwe, please try the following patch

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his > > machine. > > Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to > >

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 18:56 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:19 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I bet your bug is _not_ caused by ssb, but by some other breakage > > in another subsystem. Maybe ACPI or APIC is broken? Try to boot > > the machine without ACPI and/or

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 19:28 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:01:34 +0200 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:21 -0700, > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200 > > > > >

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 16:52 schrieben Sie: > On Friday 25 May 2007 15:59:49 Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Well if you're so clever in software development then please provide an > > exception handling for the ssb module which is specifically NOT needed by > > my onboard controller,

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 15:12 schrieben Sie: > On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:06:59 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200 > > > > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > (added linux-wir

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 15:12 schrieben Sie: On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:06:59 Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200 Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, (added linux-wireless, others) The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 16:52 schrieben Sie: On Friday 25 May 2007 15:59:49 Uwe Bugla wrote: Well if you're so clever in software development then please provide an exception handling for the ssb module which is specifically NOT needed by my onboard controller, OK? Just provide

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 18:56 schrieben Sie: On Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:19 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet your bug is _not_ caused by ssb, but by some other breakage in another subsystem. Maybe ACPI or APIC is broken? Try to boot the machine without ACPI and/or APIC.

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 19:28 schrieben Sie: On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:01:34 +0200 Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200 Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-25 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie: On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his machine. Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to test kernel 2.6.22-rc2-mm1? Those

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:06 schrieben Sie: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200 > > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > (added linux-wireless, others) > > > The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two cons

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:09 schrieben Sie: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200 > > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 > > module, BUT: >

BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi everybody, with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module, BUT: At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem to be broken: dmesg looks like this: 31 MSFT 31313031) ACPI: APIC 1FFEC058, 005A (r1 ASUS P4PE 42302E31 MSFT 31313031) ACPI: PM-Timer

BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi everybody, The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences: 1. a tight binding to module ssb whose function or necessity I neither see through nor do comprehend 2. a breakdown (disfunctionality) of my onboard NIC. lspci -v looks like this: 00:00.0 Host bridge:

BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi everybody, The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences: 1. a tight binding to module ssb whose function or necessity I neither see through nor do comprehend 2. a breakdown (disfunctionality) of my onboard NIC. lspci -v looks like this: 00:00.0 Host bridge:

BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi everybody, with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module, BUT: At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem to be broken: dmesg looks like this: 31 MSFT 31313031) ACPI: APIC 1FFEC058, 005A (r1 ASUS P4PE 42302E31 MSFT 31313031) ACPI: PM-Timer

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: Parts of Alsa sound architecture broken

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:09 schrieben Sie: On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200 Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module, BUT: At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem

Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:06 schrieben Sie: On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200 Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, (added linux-wireless, others) The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences: 1. a tight binding to module ssb whose

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-22 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 22:18 schrieben Sie: > On May 20 2007 07:28, Al Viro wrote: > >On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > >> Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer > >> feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the > >>

Re: Kernel Oops with 2.6.21.1 on an AMD K7 machine

2007-05-22 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 13:18 schrieben Sie: > Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 00:54 schrieben Sie: > > On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:57 +0200 > > > > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-22 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 22:18 schrieben Sie: On May 20 2007 07:28, Al Viro wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the issues are

Re: Kernel Oops with 2.6.21.1 on an AMD K7 machine

2007-05-22 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 13:18 schrieben Sie: Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 00:54 schrieben Sie: On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:57 +0200 Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought up showing its graphical login (kdm

Kernel Oops with 2.6.21.1 on an AMD K7 machine

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hello everybody, kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought up showing its graphical login (kdm): lspci -v, based on a "sane" kernel 2.6.22-rc2 or 2.6.20.11 (with both of them the Oops does not happen at all) looks like this: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 22:48 schrieben Sie: > On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device > > up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the "fancy > > on-demand device instantiation feature". > > > > So

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie: > On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when > > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with > > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop". However,

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 08:40 schrieben Sie: > On 5/20/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/19/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it > > > claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 08:40 schrieben Sie: On 5/20/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/19/07, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with udev.

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie: On 5/21/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with casual usage of losetup and mount -o loop. However, there is a

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 22:48 schrieben Sie: On 5/21/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create max_loop device up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the fancy on-demand device instantiation feature. So I propose we do

Kernel Oops with 2.6.21.1 on an AMD K7 machine

2007-05-21 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hello everybody, kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought up showing its graphical login (kdm): lspci -v, based on a sane kernel 2.6.22-rc2 or 2.6.20.11 (with both of them the Oops does not happen at all) looks like this: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-20 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 18:16 schrieben Sie: > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 09:10 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > On 5/20/07, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5/20/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/19/07, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-20 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie: > On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote: > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > > Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer > > > feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the > > >

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-20 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie: On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the issues are

Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-20 Thread Uwe Bugla
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 18:16 schrieben Sie: On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 09:10 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: On 5/20/07, Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/20/07, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/19/07, Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray

bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-19 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi, I am running Debian Etch 4.0 stable in connection with udev. In kernel 2.6.22-rc2 the number of available loop mounts is reduced from 8 (conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1. Symptom: If you try to mount more than one single iso-image with the loop parameter you are

bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image

2007-05-19 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi, I am running Debian Etch 4.0 stable in connection with udev. In kernel 2.6.22-rc2 the number of available loop mounts is reduced from 8 (conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1. Symptom: If you try to mount more than one single iso-image with the loop parameter you are

bug in 2.6.22-rc1: loop devices limited to one single device

2007-05-16 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi, The patch against loop.c is neither a fix, nor does it create loop devices on demand: Facts are instead, at least on my machine: The number of available loop devices is reduced from 8 (conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1. The consequence is: If you have to mount more than

bug in 2.6.22-rc1: loop devices limited to one single device

2007-05-16 Thread Uwe Bugla
Hi, The patch against loop.c is neither a fix, nor does it create loop devices on demand: Facts are instead, at least on my machine: The number of available loop devices is reduced from 8 (conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1. The consequence is: If you have to mount more than

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-07 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300 Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-07 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300 Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
age > Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and > pseudo-authorities > Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400 > From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200 Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:59:18 +0200 Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.o

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:48:50 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:15:32 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical pointsabout

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical pointsabout

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:15:32 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:48:50 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:59:18 +0200 Von: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200 Von: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-03 Thread Uwe Bugla
From: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-02 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:30:32 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list , [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-02 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Von: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-02 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Von: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-02 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:30:32 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux Kernel Mailing list linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:35:44 +0100 Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:38 +0100 Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:20:01 +0200 Von: e9hack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Betreff: Re

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 18:40:54 +0200 Von: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betre

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300 Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
e no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB > > card but you're only encouraging Uwe to be abusive since it seems to > > help get him what he wants: > > > > On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > Piepho, you are a devil, and your links do not

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400 Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
get him what he wants: On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote: Piepho, you are a devil, and your links do not work at all! Uwe On 01/05/07 00:40, Uwe Bugla wrote: Go to hell, Manuel Abraham, and do not return at all to absolutely no thinkable condition at all, and never come back

Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

2007-05-01 Thread Uwe Bugla
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300 Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module

  1   2   >