On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 22:55 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > > I additionally built my 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 kernel without High Resolution
> > > Timer, but the high ping problem is still there.
> >
> > Hmm, that's mysterious. Wild guess is that highres exposes the hidden
> > "feature" in a
On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Can you also test the following patch?
> I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard
> shared IRQs, so it might possibly generate a NAPI storm, dunno.
> Worth a try.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c
>
On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
Can you also test the following patch?
I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard
shared IRQs, so it might possibly generate a NAPI storm, dunno.
Worth a try.
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 22:55 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
I additionally built my 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 kernel without High Resolution
Timer, but the high ping problem is still there.
Hmm, that's mysterious. Wild guess is that highres exposes the hidden
feature in a different way than
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Uwe, please try the following patch
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
> > > Uwe, please try the following patch:
> > >
> > > Index: b
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie:
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you,
> > Andrew.
> >
> > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device!
>
> Could you please send the following:
>
&
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
> Uwe, please try the following patch:
>
> Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c
> ===
> --- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/b44.c2007-05-18
> 18:09:50.0 +0200
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:19 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that:
> >
> > git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git
> >
> > It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:41 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/26/07, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > > clear enough in the sense
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and
> > comprehensive.
>
>
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:40 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled
> > > b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess).
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> >
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
> > > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
> >
> > err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> > to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> > Well, I'm not the first person in the
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie:
> Andrew,
>
> I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
> him to the killfile, ... .
> I ask to try wireless-dev, as the
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work
> > with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e.
> > my router) is called Jer
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie:
On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on
his machine.
Now who
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work
with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e.
my router) is called Jerry (as a reminiscence to Mr
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie:
Andrew,
I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
to debug the problem the way he is responding.
Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
him to the killfile, ... .
I ask to try wireless-dev, as the driver
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
to debug the problem the way he is responding.
Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote:
I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
Yes, I
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:40 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote:
I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled
b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess).
Yes!
So there was
no b44-PCI driver loaded.
Well, not exactly
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and
comprehensive.
Why don't you simply submit a patch
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:41 schrieben Sie:
On 5/26/07, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:19 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that:
git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git
It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works fine for me.
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Uwe, please try the following patch:
Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c
===
--- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/b44.c2007-05-18
18:09:50.0 +0200 +++
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you,
Andrew.
Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device!
Could you please send the following:
1. the output of lsmod from the non-functioning kernel
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Uwe, please try the following patch:
Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Uwe, please try the following patch
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his
> > machine.
> > Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to
> >
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 18:56 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:19 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I bet your bug is _not_ caused by ssb, but by some other breakage
> > in another subsystem. Maybe ACPI or APIC is broken? Try to boot
> > the machine without ACPI and/or
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 19:28 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:01:34 +0200 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:21 -0700,
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
> > >
> >
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 16:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 15:59:49 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Well if you're so clever in software development then please provide an
> > exception handling for the ssb module which is specifically NOT needed by
> > my onboard controller,
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 15:12 schrieben Sie:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:06:59 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
> >
> > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> >
> > (added linux-wir
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 15:12 schrieben Sie:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:06:59 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
(added linux-wireless, others)
The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 16:52 schrieben Sie:
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:59:49 Uwe Bugla wrote:
Well if you're so clever in software development then please provide an
exception handling for the ssb module which is specifically NOT needed by
my onboard controller, OK?
Just provide
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 18:56 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:19 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet your bug is _not_ caused by ssb, but by some other breakage
in another subsystem. Maybe ACPI or APIC is broken? Try to boot
the machine without ACPI and/or APIC.
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 19:28 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:01:34 +0200 Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:21 -0700,
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his
machine.
Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to
test kernel 2.6.22-rc2-mm1?
Those
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:06 schrieben Sie:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
>
> "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
>
> (added linux-wireless, others)
>
> > The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two cons
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:09 schrieben Sie:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
>
> "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0
> > module, BUT:
>
Hi everybody,
with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module,
BUT:
At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem to be broken:
dmesg looks like this:
31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: APIC 1FFEC058, 005A (r1 ASUS P4PE 42302E31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: PM-Timer
Hi everybody,
The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences:
1. a tight binding to module ssb whose function or necessity I neither see
through nor do comprehend
2. a breakdown (disfunctionality) of my onboard NIC.
lspci -v looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge:
Hi everybody,
The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences:
1. a tight binding to module ssb whose function or necessity I neither see
through nor do comprehend
2. a breakdown (disfunctionality) of my onboard NIC.
lspci -v looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge:
Hi everybody,
with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module,
BUT:
At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem to be broken:
dmesg looks like this:
31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: APIC 1FFEC058, 005A (r1 ASUS P4PE 42302E31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: PM-Timer
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:09 schrieben Sie:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0
module, BUT:
At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:06 schrieben Sie:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
(added linux-wireless, others)
The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences:
1. a tight binding to module ssb whose
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 22:18 schrieben Sie:
> On May 20 2007 07:28, Al Viro wrote:
> >On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> >> feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> >>
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 13:18 schrieben Sie:
> Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 00:54 schrieben Sie:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:57 +0200
> >
> > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 22:18 schrieben Sie:
On May 20 2007 07:28, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
issues are
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 13:18 schrieben Sie:
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 00:54 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:57 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is
brought up showing its graphical login (kdm
Hello everybody,
kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought
up showing its graphical login (kdm):
lspci -v, based on a "sane" kernel 2.6.22-rc2 or 2.6.20.11 (with both of them
the Oops does not happen at all) looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 22:48 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device
> > up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the "fancy
> > on-demand device instantiation feature".
> >
> > So
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when
> > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with
> > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop". However,
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 08:40 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/20/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/19/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it
> > > claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 08:40 schrieben Sie:
On 5/20/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/07, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it
claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with
udev.
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie:
On 5/21/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when
loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with
casual usage of losetup and mount -o loop. However, there is a
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 22:48 schrieben Sie:
On 5/21/07, Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create max_loop device
up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the fancy
on-demand device instantiation feature.
So I propose we do
Hello everybody,
kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought
up showing its graphical login (kdm):
lspci -v, based on a sane kernel 2.6.22-rc2 or 2.6.20.11 (with both of them
the Oops does not happen at all) looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 18:16 schrieben Sie:
> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 09:10 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > On 5/20/07, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5/20/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 5/19/07, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie:
> On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> > > feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> > >
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie:
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
issues are
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 18:16 schrieben Sie:
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 09:10 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
On 5/20/07, Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/20/07, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/07, Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray
Hi,
I am running Debian Etch 4.0 stable in connection with udev.
In kernel 2.6.22-rc2 the number of available loop mounts is reduced from 8
(conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
Symptom: If you try to mount more than one single iso-image with
the loop parameter you are
Hi,
I am running Debian Etch 4.0 stable in connection with udev.
In kernel 2.6.22-rc2 the number of available loop mounts is reduced from 8
(conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
Symptom: If you try to mount more than one single iso-image with
the loop parameter you are
Hi,
The patch against loop.c is neither a fix, nor does it create
loop devices on demand:
Facts are instead, at least on my machine:
The number of available loop devices is reduced from 8 (conventional
standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
The consequence is: If you have to mount more than
Hi,
The patch against loop.c is neither a fix, nor does it create
loop devices on demand:
Facts are instead, at least on my machine:
The number of available loop devices is reduced from 8 (conventional
standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
The consequence is: If you have to mount more than
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
age
> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
> pseudo-authorities
> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400
> From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:59:18 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.o
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:48:50 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:15:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
pointsabout
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
pointsabout
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:15:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:48:50 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:59:18 +0200
Von: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about
From: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:30:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list
, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:30:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux Kernel Mailing list
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:35:44 +0100
Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:38 +0100
Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:20:01 +0200
Von: e9hack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 18:40:54 +0200
Von: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betre
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
e no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB
> > card but you're only encouraging Uwe to be abusive since it seems to
> > help get him what he wants:
> >
> > On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Piepho, you are a devil, and your links do not
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb
get him what he wants:
On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Piepho, you are a devil, and your links do not work at all!
Uwe
On 01/05/07 00:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Go to hell, Manuel Abraham, and do not return at all to absolutely no
thinkable condition at all, and never come back
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
