d-off-by: Victor Chong
Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier
---
v2:
* Added patch description
[v1] lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/983949/
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
index e1aafe842d66..cca5c09
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Thompson
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:57:28PM +0900, Victor Chong wrote:
>
> This (empty) patch description seems unusually terse! Surely there
> should be some clues in the description about why this messages
> deserves user/dev/
Suggested-by: Jerome Forissier
Signed-off-by: Victor Chong
Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier
---
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
index e1aafe842d66..cca5c091e55a 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee
asynchronous request will affect the
corresponding order of the new requests.
So we think that the asynchronous requests should be added to proc
struct instead of thread’s todo list.
Please let me know, if some things wrong in my opinion.
Signed-off-by: Victor Chong
---
drivers/android/binder.c | 2
4 matches
Mail list logo