[OOPS 2.6.21-rc7-mm1] kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/inode.c:272 (sysfs_drop_dentry)

2007-04-24 Thread Vincent Vanackere
Hi, I'm getting the following oops at boot with the latest -mm kernel : --- kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/inode.c:272 ... EIP is at sysfs_drop_dentry+0x139/0x165 Call trace : remove_dir __sysfs_remove_dir dput kobject_del device_del ... --

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Vincent Vanackere
On 4/4/07, Éric Piel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 04/04/2007 10:52 PM, Vincent Vanackere wrote/a écrit: > +unsigned long first_jiffies; space warning! Sorry for being annoying ;-) Eric Indeed you are8-) ... new version attached ... Best regards, Vincent --

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Vincent Vanackere
On 4/4/07, Karl Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would this be more acceptable? I haven't compiled or tested yet..but you can see what I'm trying to do.. make the delay time based instead of implementation/count based... Well, I was going to submit a similar patch so I'd say that's the right

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Vincent Vanackere
On 4/4/07, Éric Piel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This default value is set to 300 ms. On my Xserver, the default value is 660 ms and by default in my distrib it's set to 500 ms. So, indeed, the default value of the ati_remote is quite small. Maybe you could increase FILTER_MAX to 10 (= 600 ms) in

Re: [PATCH] lirc: remove backwards compatibility macro obfuscation (Was: Free Linux Driver Development!)

2007-02-02 Thread Vincent Vanackere
On 2/2/07, Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] drivers/lirc_atiusb/lirc_atiusb.c | 102 - ^^ I may be mistaken, but the lirc_atiusb module looks redondant with the driver alre

Re: 2.6.11-ck1 (cfq-timeslice)

2005-03-07 Thread Vincent Vanackere
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:07:50 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vincent Vanackere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > (I can't live without reiser4 any more...). > > Tell us more? > I've been storing all my important data (inclu

Re: 2.6.11-ck1 (cfq-timeslice)

2005-03-04 Thread Vincent Vanackere
> Added since 2.6.10-ck7: > +cfq-ts-21.diff > The latest version of Jens' cfq-timeslice i/o scheduler now heavily tested and > with full read i/o priority support Speaking of the cfq-timeslice scheduler, is there a version that applies to recent -mm kernels ? (I cannot find anything more recent th

Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1

2005-03-02 Thread Vincent Vanackere
Works fine for me now, thanks ! Vincent On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:24:14 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, there are no vmlinux references to lib/parser.o's symbols. So it isn't > getting linked in. > > In lib/Makefile, remove parser.o from the lib-y: rule and add > > obj-y +

Re: Undefined symbols in 2.6.11-rc5-mm1

2005-03-02 Thread Vincent Vanackere
I have the exact same problem. .config is attached (this may be a debian specific problem as I'm running debian too) Regards, Vincent On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:23:31 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keenan Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I just compiled 2.6.11-rc5-mm1 and

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1

2005-02-23 Thread Vincent Vanackere
I'm getting several modules with undefined symbols : Kernel: arch/i386/boot/bzImage is ready Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST *** Warning: "match_octal" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "match_token" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "match_int" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Wa

[2.6.11-rc1-mm1] Strange MCE errors

2005-01-24 Thread Vincent Vanackere
Hi all, since I've replaced my Athlon XP 1800 with a Athlon XP 3000 (Barton/FSB333), my logs are flooded with these warnings: MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0. Bank 1: d4004152 MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurre